Teachers.Net Focus Session
Thursday, January 7, 1999
Literacy and the Net
With
Jeff Cooper
Sponsored by
In Education
JCooper - I am holding
this chat to share ideas regarding Literacy and the Net. My motive is somewhat
selfish, since I will be training teachers in my district on this subject
later this month.
JCooper - I am a
Computer Resource Teacher at Portola Middle School in El Cerrito CA. I
help teachers and students integrate computers, more specifically the Net
into curricula. I am very interested in what I see as the potential for
shifting pedagogy away from teacher centered didacticism towards student
centered learning. I believe this is a critical issue in the area of Literacy
as well. We need to learn how to motivate students to read starting from
Day 1. I would like to explore here how people think this can be accomplished.
Sandy/K/Mo - I teach
kdg. and we are in the lab 5 days a week 16 computers with 22 kids
Sandy/K/Mo - I have
found that the computer, email, interactive sites have raised the level
of my kids for beginning reading
Sandy/K/Mo - no that
cost money :-)
JCooper - I am concerned
by how literacy rates are declining, in my district, and I believe across
the country as well. I attribute this to a variety of factors: 1) Lack
of reading at home 2) Short attention spans (tv) 3) Ends oriented instruction
(grades) rather than means oriented (students there to self-improve).
Shady - I agree 100%
Coop.
JCooper - I firmly
believe that we need to get the kids started as young as possible... and
agree with Sandy, that the computer is a major carrot for students. Email
projects, interactive online, the Net can be *the tool for breaking down
the classroom walls*. Once the kids are here there are many positive motivators.
There are downsides to the Net as well... but I will withhold critical
remarks for later in the hour.
Sandy/K/Mo - I have
different sites that the kids can go to, the ones that have the smaller
atten. span will stay with it :-)
Sandy/K/Mo - we have
kinder pals.. have made a web site, and are doing several projects
Shady - Even though
I have 5 computers in my room and a lab available to me. I only have one
computer with internet access.
JCooper - I have
been collecting Literacy WWW sites, and will post them to Teachers.Net
later this month. I am constantly on the prowl for more, and not just sites,
but ideas. I encourage everyone here to send me whatever info you deem
pertinent (coops@edmail.com)... in
return I will send you everything I get. Collaboration is the key as well....
getting teacher to share ideas is critical... how else can we expect to
do our best?
MaryWA - In my district,
we have a LOT of kids who don't own a single book of their own, and many
parents are either monolingual Spanish speaking or aren't good readers
themselves.
MaryWA - Shady we
have a small computer lab in my building that isn't wired to the net. The
4/5th grade classes are, but that's it.
meeha/ece/tx - I
have 4 computers in my room, the computer tech shudders when I ask to bring
my kids to her lab -- and NO net access. at 4 and 5, the kids are learning
to manage the mouse and to work their way around on the 'at ease' screen.
Guess that is good for pre-literate munchkins.
Shady - Does anyone
have their own classroom web page?
kinderkate - Same
here Mary. We USED to have a schoolwide program where we bought class sets
of books 4 times a year. After we used them for the unit the kids brought
them home to keep. It was great.
Applelady - We have
a wonderful network in our school and min. of 2 mahcines in every room,
plus 2 - 30 machine labs that the kids go to every day for 10min(K-3,5)
and 20 min 4th gr
kinderkate - We are
a large school with one computer lab. Kids get to use it one hour a week.
We each have a computer in the classroom - hooked to the net- but you would
be surprised at how many teachers don't ever TURN it on!!!!!
JCooper - I think
beyond WWW sites, there are other options the Net affords us that need
exploring regarding literacy. My personal expertise is in utilizing Educational
MOOs, which are virtual communities and primarily *text based* for
real time collaboration, team teaching, exploring, etc. Many have told
me that students won't respond to text only environments (although MOOs
are evolving... MOO= Multiuser Object Oriented program). There is a lot
to learn... and become involved. They are somewhat difficult to learn (steep
learning curve)... and for that reason have been shunned by many educators.
I wonder, and pose this to the group... have we become too complacent,
expecting immediate answers, and graphic details... at the expense of imagination?
I feel that this reaches into the core of literacy.
JCooper - I agree
with kinderkate... many teachers won't turn their computers on, because
*they are beyond their realm of expertise*... and when a teacher is outside
their area of mastery, they cringe and hide... rather than dive in and
explore.
Kathleen - JCooper,
many teachers work in an environment that causes them to fear failure,
so being faced with the challenges of technology can be daunting
MaryWA - JC, agreed.
I had to sub for the comp tech in our building for three months and people
panicked if they couldn't find me to fix it for them, rather than try on
their own.
Sandy/K/Mo - You
just need to go in and do it.. kinders can and will do anything.. :-)
Applelady - Our tech
tchr says "Let the other schools make the mistakes first and we'll learn."
lvan/8/CT - Jeff,
I disagree with your generalization that teachers outside their area of
mastery "cringe and hide" - many many of us do dive in and explore.
Mary - JCooper, I
think that the biggest obsticle to teachers really getting involved , besides
the lack of classroom connections to the web, is the lack a adequate inservice
Sandy/K/Mo - :-)
the older kids get upset because kinders are doing things they can't
lvan/8/CT - My team
has been actively involved in designed activities for our students that
integrate technology into our individual curricula.
Applelady - Sandy,
it is kind of hard when the administration supports the tech tchr outlook
Applelady - Mary,
you are exactly right, we are NOT given the time to explore
lvan/8/CT - The difficulty
we have is in not having enough hardware to support what we can dream up.
JCooper - I posed
a question to students, but may have posed it to the teachers as well,
namely, if I gave an assignment to you 35 students, whose responsibility
would it be for you to learn. Student 1 raised their hand and said "the
teacher." I agreed with him, since indeed, if one project were to reach
35 students a lot of responsibility would be on the teacher. Student 2
said "the school" Student 3 said "our parents" Student 4 said "ourselves"
finally. I feel that students have become distantly removed from a sense
of what education should be all about. Students should read to improve
themselves... not just to get a grade... but that is (in large part) the
message that comes across to them.
MaryWA - JC, my job
is to teach, it's the child's repsonsibility to learn. I can teach, but
I can't MAKE that child learn.
Applelady - JC, I
tell my kids everyday that they are in control and responsible
carolinajoy - Evening,
all...I'm on team to plan technology inservice for our elementary staff...help
me by telling me what NOT to do for teachers
JCooper - I reposed
the question to them... namely, if I gave you a dozen projects... who would
be responsible. Immediately they recognized that it was their own... indeed
it is their own lives... but we don't give them the choices. That is why
I wonder... when it comes to literacy... can we find ways to give students
more choice... and therefore more responsibility... to *want to learn to
read*. I feel that the net affords us this opportunity. We don't all have
to read the same book or story...
MaryWA - Carolina,
don't make yourself indispensible. Let the teachers learn to do it for
themselves, or you'll run yourself ragged.
kinderkate - Definitely
children should KNOW it is their responsibility to learn. And they should
know that from KINDER on up.
Sandy/K/Mo - Jeff...
have you taken part in any of the gsn ( I think that's it) activities?
JCooper - Global
Schoolhouse Network Sandhy?
Sandy/K/Mo - yes
thats it... I gave that site to the 7th grade science teacher and they
had a GREAT time... even placed in one of the activites
Sandy/K/Mo - the
kids really got into it.. worked harder and stayed with it.. she is going
to do more with it
JCooper - Imagine
becoming part of Moby Dick, or Dante's Inferno... the online versions allow
you to jump into the action... of course, they are not the *real* versions,
scaled down tremendously, but becoming part of the action increases motivation.
Sandy/K/Mo - I enjoyed
taking my kids on the scavenger hunt through Plymouth Rock at Thanksgiving..
if they had been older would have been really cool
Kathleen - JCooper,
my concern about virtual vs print reading is the elimination of the opportunity
for kids to construct
JCooper - Obviously
we disagree on that point Kathleen... but as others have noted, many teachers
don't even turn on their computers... even when given support. Frankly,
I find teachers to be very difficult students. Case in point: teachers
were brought to Tapped In MOO to learn how to utilize it for both real
time and asynchronous communication. They complained that it wasn't intuitive
immediately, that there wasn't enough point and click and left, never to
return. Because they couldn't grasp something immediately, they got discouraged
and left. Do you find an irony there?
Sandy/K/Mo - I do....
we expect from our kids what we won't do :-) at our school several teachers
use computer time as a break
Kathleen - Yes, that
is ironic considering what we hope for from students, but students have
a different (earlier) background of experience with technology, a better
"intuition" based upon those early intros to the technology
JCooper - Actually
Kathleen, there is a much greater opportunity for students to construct
online than anywhere else. Case in point: I was teaching 9th grade English
to classes of students on the 3rd grade level. Most had pretty much given
up on writing. I had them write stories about their city, and then posted
it to an educational listserv that distributed to 27 schools around the
world. Several months later, school newspapers arrived, many with my student
articles in them. The students felt enabled because other people around
the world (one as far as Finland) thought that *what they had to say was
important*. Students can create WWW pages online in under an hour, and
show them to their friends... and make new ones. To me... it is this type
of reaching out that is critical.
Kathleen - Oh, I
agree that the 'net experience is wonderful, but not as a substitute for
reading the book. I realize that Jeff probably isn't advocating it as a
substitute.
JCooper - Actually
Kathleen... I am to a degree.
Kathleen - Yes, yes,
lots of opportunity to construct. But not the same and should never get
to the point of being to the exclusion of reading from print and constructing
from the text, I think we are in agreement.
JCooper - I do see
downsides to the Net.... indeed, the high focus on graphics... tends to
diminish imagination... compared to text based reading. I am concerned
that if students see a picture, then suddenly that is what Aramis looks
like, rather than constructing their own image. What do others think about
this?
Sandy/K/Mo - I agree...
there is something about holding that book in your hands and just "going"
READING is my passion...
Kathleen - diminishing
imagination in a way, yes, that is what I'm getting at. Of course, it encourages
imagination in other ways
Sandy/K/Mo - I know
that if a movie is made of a book I have read... that if the actor isn't
what I visualized it really bothers me
JCooper - That is
also why I favor text based virtual environments... it is the teachers
who decry them saying "the kids think it's too boring." If teachers argue
that text based worlds are boring, then what is the future of literacy?
Must it by nature change to include graphic depictions?
Kathleen - Certainly
I think that the 'net is much more beneficial and less harmful than many
uses of television have been in terms of vegetizing kids brains (is that
a word?? it is now ;-)
JCooper - Net=interactive
by nature ... TV=passive consumerism
Kathleen - why a
virtual experience if it is just text anyway?
JCooper - Isn't a
book just a virtual text based experience? My interest in Educational MOOs
(and some are set in the future)... allows students to become online authors,
and join in the collaborative work of others.
Sandy/K/Mo - Jeff...
I haven't seen these MOOs can you send me a link?
Kathleen - Jeff,
as long as their first experiences are with books....or do you see books
as anachronistic not far down the road?
JCooper - Another
point re: hypertext... with all the pointing and clicking... are we moving
away from in depth analysis? How deep is the WWW? Students read (maybe)
a paragraph or two... then click somewhere else. (Note that we're getting
towards the end of the hour... so please feel free to make your own negative
rants re: the Net, Literacy, etc. known now).
Sandy/K/Mo - I hope
not Kat.. that would be terrible
Sandy/K/Mo - as much
as I am involved with the computer and internet I still think that books,
storytelling, puppets, interactions of stories is very important
Kathleen - point
and click works well for the sesame street generation, they have attention
span of about 2 minutes and a great need for visual stimulation
JCooper - Don't get
me wrong Kathleen... I am in favor of books... but I do see shifts happening,
for both the better and worse. Let me add one really positive thing about
the Net. I've been talking with teachers in Australia, who because of the
distance problems there embraced the Net ten years ago... and have been
online with their students ever since. Starting in *first grade* students
learn keyboarding... in second they have email. Students are *project oriented
self-directed learners*. The program is along the lines of Montessori...
with students taking active responsibility from a very young age. Once
they reach high school, the teachers have to do very little... the students
have become highly involved self-learners. Can we ever do that here?
Kathleen - project
oritented self directed sounds like they are going in the right direction
JCooper - I would
really love to continue this conversation... perhaps I can have another
meeting next week? Would others be interested? Unfortunately, I have a
tech meeting to attend (now). I encourage people to stay and continue the
dialogue. Also... please email me (coops@edmail.com)
any ideas you have regarding this topic, WWW sites, etc. I will redistribute
my findings to teachers.net.
Kathleen - Bye for
now!
JCooper - waves bye
Home
| Search
| Chat
| Lessons
| Mentors
| Jobs
| Tools
| Submit
| PR |
Advertise
| Catalog
© 1996-98, Teachers.Net Web Servicessm,
a division of Teachers Websm.
All Rights Reserved.