Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement
    Posted by: anon on 2/09/16
    () Comments

    On 2/08/16, agree again wrote:
    > So agree Donna. I worked all through college and even
    > while teaching I worked part-retail (had to pay the bills
    > and starting salaries were low). I have put in more than
    > my 40 quarters. Ugh.
    >
    >
    >
    > On 11/05/15, lorenzo wrote:
    >> On 8/04/15, agree wrote:
    >>> I am a CA teacher who also worked for department
    stores,
    >>> travel agencies, and the federal government prior to
    >>> being a CA teacher (I love my career!). I have put in
    my
    >>> 40 quarters and more. This does deeply concern me as I
    >>> hate to think of all that money that I put in and would
    >>> lose.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 7/21/15, DonnaR/CA wrote:
    >>>> Old thread, maybe, but it's still pertinent.
    >>>>
    >>>> We need to fight this old law. It was designed to keep
    >>>> folks from double-dipping, getting both STRS and SS if
    >>>> they didn't pay into SS.
    >>>>
    >>>> If you are a 2nd career teacher, or you worked a lot
    of
    >>>> summers, an after-school job, took a stop-out from
    >>>> teaching, or perhaps you taught in a state or school
    >>>> where you
    >>> actually
    >>>> paid into Social Security - you should find out if you
    >>>> have earned your 40 quarters. This is where the
    >>>> "unfairness"
    >>> comes
    >>>> in. You have paid into SS, you should be able to claim
    >>>> it.
    >>> If
    >>>> you had not taught in public school, you would collect
    >>>> that full amount of SS. But the law is slapping those
    >>>> of us in
    >>> the
    >>>> face who have had a 2nd career, or tried to supplement
    >>>> our income in our younger years by taking an
    >>>> after-school job.
    >>> We
    >>>> have paid into the system, we should be able to get
    >>>> 100% of what our payment would have been without STRS,
    >>>> instead of a measly 25%.
    >>>>
    >>>> There are petitions rolling around the Internet, as
    >>>> well as outside of stores (occasionally) to repeal
    this
    >>>> law. Stop by and sign it.
    >>>>
    >>>> BTW, California is not the only state that does this.
    >>>> So do Missouri and Illinois, and about 10 others.
    >>>>
    >>>> For the record, I am NOT a person to think I'm
    entitled
    >>>> to anything. But if I paid into something, by George,
    >>>> I'd like
    >>> to
    >>>> get it! If I had not worked outside of the CA STRS
    >>>> system, I would say, OK, I don't get SS. Period.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Donna
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Donna

    That's only part of it. The kicker is you have to work in
    SS-covered employment and make SUBSTANTIAL earnings to not
    be affected by the offsets. I live in Oregon now, and just
    five years in Nevada PERS means I am affected by the WEP.
    I have some 32 years in working, but I only have 19 years
    in "substantial earnings."

    Earning SS and getting a pension are not "double dipping."
    Never was--that was Reagan-era rhetoric.


    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 8/29/14, by ~Cher~.
  • Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 7/21/15, by DonnaR/CA.
  • Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 8/04/15, by agree.
  • Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 11/05/15, by lorenzo.
  • Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 2/08/16, by agree again.
  • Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 2/09/16, by anon.
  • Re: FYI: SocISecurity in Calif. along with your STRS retirement , 3/06/16, by lawrence.