Question the Questions, Instead of Answer the Answers
By Bill Page[Editors' note: Share your comments with the author and other readers in the Comments section below this article. ]
Bill Page’s popular and highly readable book, At-Risk Students is available through Amazon.com or directly from Bill at www.billpageteacher.com.
In our concerns for at-risk kids, we need first to examine our questions very critically.
Every question has a set of assumptions with a built-in framework that is likely to affect, skew, or limit its answer. Whom you ask, how you ask, the context, word connotations, voice inflection, and even who’s asking, will shape and determine the answer and its completeness.
Alfie Kohn, in a recent article stated that our first question should be, “What do children need?” followed by “How can we meet those needs?” From this point of departure we will end up in a very different place than if we had begun by asking, “How do I get children to do what I want?”
Political pollsters understand the question/answer relationship and use it to theiradvantage. I’m afraid too many educators argue about at-risk issues and solutions without questioning their assumptions, considering the limiting presumptions, and defining the terms involved. An oft used quote says, “I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.”
Answers Depend on the Questions
The question “What is the best textbook to use in this course?” might resultin an excellent choice of textbook. But the question “Should we use atextbook in this course?” could result in an entirely different answer. Withthat prompt, one might consider using community resources, guest speakers,or multimedia sources in lieu of a textbook.
However, the question “Should we offer this course?” requires a very different set of considerations and different decisions. The question most frequently frames the answer, limits the alternatives, and always influences the answer. Questions about the use of failing grades, and grading procedures are applied to kids at risk are particularly troublesome.
Ambiguous Questions Cause More Questions, Not Answers
To answer the question “What should we do about the dropout problem?” otherquestions must first be considered: “Who is the “we? Society?Theschool district?The school?The dropout’s family? Is ‘problem’ really singular or is it plural? Does the ‘do about’ refer to eliminating the problem, finding causes, placing blame, or seeking alternatives? Are ‘dropouts’ all in the same category or all subject to the same singular solution?”
Looking Closely at Our Questions
For questions that are especially difficult to answer, maybe the question should be questioned before the answer is answered. Tough, nagging, chronic questions about the achievement gap, poverty, or use of failure are problematic because of the complexity and ambiguity of the question, not because of difficulty in answering.
Teachers having trouble with a few students disrupting lessons and disengaging, might ask some questions about the use of differentiated lessons, assignments, and evaluations. They might consider a problem solving approach, small group work, and dozens of other ideas offering the flexibility needed by kids at-risk and helpful to everyone in the class . A good close look at the questions we ask about at-risk kids could go a long way in relieving the at-risk problem.
Here’s An Answer to Every Question
If you are going to answer, there is one single answer that will satisfy any and all questions. The answer is just two words but they are quite appropriate. The phrase can and should be used to answer virtually every question asked: . . . (Are you ready?) . . . The answer is—It depends!
With joy in sharing,
