|
|

Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!
Posted by let me clarify on 7/22/09
Joe you must have misunderstood me when I said that it was easy to become a teacher. Let me clarify...you are correct in saying that it is extremely difficult to get a JOB teaching. I live in PA and we have a teaching surplus that would make a lot of people cringe at the thought of getting a job. I had to fill out countless online applications, mail out tons of packets and go through countless interviews and demonstration lessons before I was offered 2 teaching positions. So I agree with you on that point, it is very difficult to obtain a job as a teacher. What I was trying to say in my previous post is that becoming a certified teacher is ridiculously easy. You only need to go to college for 4 years and WHAM you are ready to go find a job. 21 year olds are becoming teachers and are sometimes teaching students that are 20 years old...that was the point I was making. Yes, we do have to go to graduate school...but come on what profession doesn't? The fact that we are able to jump right in after only 4 years is the reason why the market is saturated, and it is just way to easy. I started at 44,000 with only a bachelors degree (and yes, I still say it's ridiculous) and will top out at 110,000. My graduate school is free and in two more years when I get my masters degree I will be making 57000. That is a lot of money for someone just 2 years out of college who does not work in the summers. That's what I was saying. On 7/22/09, Joe wrote: > The pay is good? Getting a teaching job is easy? > > Yes, the pay is good in my state, at $38k to start. However, I started fresh > out of college 30 years ago, at $30k, working as an actuary. I sent out > three resumes, typewritten on rag-content erasable typewriter paper, and was > at my desk working two weeks later! > > Today, we must fill out online applications, AND repeat the same information > in a C.V., attend successive interviews, and be treated as though we're > running for the US Senate. During the interview, we're told all about the > ehealth insurance plan by the HR "Professional" (I actually want to teach > for money. Sending a copy of a health insurance plan to my mortgage company > won't stop a foreclosure, last time I checked). > > Oh and I do know two teachers who were let go in a local school. The school > let them go, and kept another mediocre alternate-route graduate on for next > year. > > > On 7/22/09, Pa Teacher wrote: >> It is true that teachers are not technically offered a contract when they >> are initially hired, but what you talk about rarely happens. I know if > ONE >> teacher who worked in a very good school district in the suburbs of >> pittsburgh who was let go because the school had to get rid of her > position >> due to the budget issues. If you know if teachers who taught in the city >> and moved to the suburbs, then were let go and the district hired someone >> else to replace them....the only think I can think of is that they are > just >> no good. A school district is not going to get rid of its good teachers, > it >> doesn't matter if they are first year or not. Substitute teaching for 8 >> years and not able to find a job?? Again, maybe they just aren't that >> impressive and should consider leaving the state. >> >> I completely agree with you that teaching is a profession and we should >> approach the job as professionals. Our pay here in PA is great and again, >> if you are one of those unfortunate teachers who work at a low paying >> school, you can leave the district for more money if you choose. But to > say >> that we are all professionals and act as such?? Do you watch the news? >> Becoming a teacher is one of the easiest things in the world to do. > Someone >> who posted earlier talks about how an engineer makes 80,000, lawyers make > so >> much money as well as doctors. Lawyers and doctors go through a lot more >> than we do, and the last time I checked you need more than a bachelors to >> become either a lawyer or a doctor. When a 21 year old can jump right > into >> the field and do the same work that a 30 year teacher is doing, then that > is >> a little too easy. I love teaching, but I have discovered that a majority >> of the new teachers that I meet today "settle" on teaching because they >> didn't know what to do with their lives. They know the pay and benefits > are >> good, and they know that it is incredibly easy to get certified to teach. >> Raise the standards to become a teacher, and maybe we can have better >> footing to complain about things. Not that I would complain...we work 9 >> months a year and many of us make a lot of money. Given the choice to do >> what we do, or be a "normal" worker making just as much with 2 weeks off a >> year...Teachers have it made. >> >> >> On 7/22/09, No one gets a "contract" here wrote: >>> Suburban PA teachers get "hired"- not actually PROMISED a job- for a >>> period of one year. If you're not offered a "contract" after one >>> complete year, you're out. Period. >>> People I know have left city jobs thinking that they would "try" the >>> suburbs since they were "offered" a position. After a year- no job. They >>> are per diem subs. Occasionally, long term comes up, but they are >>> jostled around each year from school-to-school, often the DAY BEFORE >>> students arrive. >>> My own kids have had 50&37; of their teachers as subs without permanent >>> contracts. One teacher had been a "move around" sub without a contract >>> for 8 years. She does not know where/if she is teaching in a few weeks. >>> This is no way to live and raise a family.... but, somehow, we teachers >>> accept and bow to this kind of treatment. The "professionalism" that is >>> expected from us far surpasses the way we are sometimes treated, so I >>> understand where bitter feelings come from. However, we can put our >>> frustrations to good use in the form of letters, phone calls, and EMails >>> to the "powers that be" instead of dwelling in negativity on a website >>> that won't do anyone any good. We are professionals, worthy of fair >>> wages and respect- the same as any other profession. We must act >>> accordingly, and support each other in our endeavors. Sometimes that >>> requires sympathy or empathy, sometimes it's tough love. Stay strong. We >>> teachers shape the future like no one else can! (or WILL) For that, we >>> are worthy. >>> >>> On 7/21/09, sped wrote: >>>> On 7/21/09, maybe I'm bitter wrote: >>>>> I'm sorry, but I must say that this sound pretty aggressive. This >>>> board exists for people to >>>>> be able to freely express their opinions/ feelings. No one is forced >>>> to read it. >>>> >>>> True, and I'm free to express my opinions about their opinions. And, >>>> the fact that said poster's opinions include that teachers have no >>>> rights anywhere in the country, when in fact teachers have above >>> average >>>> to excellent employment rights compared to most other professions, I >>>> feel it's necessary to bring up a point of reason. >>>> >>>>> If one has >>>>> never been in a situation on the job where they were abused, it's >>>>>difficult to understand >>>>> someone else's emotions. >>>> >>>> Ah, but I have. Well, I haven't been "abused," but I have been in >>>> situations that were less than ideal, not what I was hired to do, and >>>> the people evaluating me kept getting me mixed up with someone else >>>> new, in the same department, and who had the same first name (he got >>>> non-renewed too... I wonder if one of us didn't deserve it and the >>> other >>>> did, but they just decided to nix us both because they couldn't sort >>> out >>>> who was who). I have been non-renewed once, and laid off once. I >>> moved >>>> on, have taught successfully in an above average suburban Chicago >>>> district for years, and am now a sped administrator in that district. >>>> >>>> Point is, it goes both ways. You're allowed to freely express your >>>> opinions, but so is everyone else. That's kind of the point... >>>> >>>>> The problem with NYC, there is only one board of ed. If you are "let >>>> go" with >>>>> "discontinuance" from one school, that means you can't be hired by any >>>> other of 1500 >>>>> schools in the city. That seems to me a little harsh. I would've been >>>> happy to leave the >>>>> school and find a "better fit", but that wasn't given to me as an >>> option. >>>> >>>> Well, if Bank of America fired you at a branch in NYC, they wouldn't >>>> hire you in Boston. You live in one big district, that's the way it >>> is. >>>> If you look at it objectively, as a tax payer and possibly a parent >>> who >>>> sends kids to the district, why would you want your kid's school to >>> hire >>>> teachers fired with cause from another school in the district? >>>> >>>>> I wish the union AT LEAST made "sure all the paperwork and >>>> observations are done >>>>> correctly" which was not the case. >>>> >>>> Did you ask them to? >>>> >>>>> I sincerely hope that misconducts of such nature are >>>>> less prevalent outside NYC. >>>> >>>> They are not. First year (second, third, etc.) teachers get fired >>> until >>>> they have tenure. I don't know how long that takes in NYC. >>>> >>>> I don't know your contract or anything about teaching in NY. However, >>>> in IL and in my district, you can have good observations and not be >>>> rehired. You don't need a reason at all. Now, being terminated with a >>>> bar to rehire would take more documentation (though a non-rehire >>>> probably isn't getting back into my district even without an official >>>> termination, but we're relatively small). >>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by job-seeker.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by Elena.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by pixie.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by Marina.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by WEK.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by SpecEd Teacher.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by Mark.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/17/09, by Mark.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/18/09, by job seeker.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/18/09, by NC teacher.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/18/09, by mark.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/19/09, by Marina.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/19/09, by NC teacher.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/19/09, by kate.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/19/09, by mark.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/20/09, by julia.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 6/20/09, by Catsister.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/01/09, by mel.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/14/09, by teaching in PA.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/14/09, by Compared to what?.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/14/09, by mark.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/14/09, by anon.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/14/09, by sped.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/15/09, by PA Teacher.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/16/09, by sped.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/20/09, by maybe I'm bitter.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/20/09, by deal with it.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/21/09, by Sympathetic.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/21/09, by deal with it.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/21/09, by sped.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/21/09, by maybe I'm bitter.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/21/09, by sped.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by No one gets a "contract" here.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by Pa Teacher.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by Joe.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by let me clarify.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by Not as easy in ALL states.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by Elena.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by let me clarify once again.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/22/09, by Oh New York.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/23/09, by Joe.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/23/09, by Clarification.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/23/09, by Elena.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/23/09, by don't like tests.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/23/09, by NBCTer.
- Re: "the myth of underpaid teachers" no longer true!, 7/23/09, by Clarification.
|