|
|

Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice
Posted by Jodi on 6/30/09
On 6/29/09, Teach277 wrote: > What I'd like to know is who created the TI? How much were they paid to create such a b.s. > test? How much of the New York City Department of Ed. money was wasted for that? > > Not only was that test rediculous, it was a waste of time. I was accepted in the "New Teacher > Finder" or how I like to call it, "The No Teaching Positions Application". I have logged onto > that thing almost twice a day before they announced the NYC hiring freeze. Now what? Just > sit and wait. All the money I have wasted on my degree, state tests, certification, has been a > waste thus far... b/c here I am three years later still a substitute teacher who cannot make > ends meet. > > As far as the way teachers in America teach, it really is a joke. I have seen classrooms that > have spun out of control b/c the teacher has no control whatsoever. The children have no > boundaries. Students need boundaries and they need to pay attention. They must be > responsible for their own work. We give grades to leniently, always curving or passing. I > believe that we should teach like the Chinese, only letting students move onto the next grade > level when they have mastered the content. Making them actually WORK, not let them GEY BY. > Challenge them so they reach optimum potential. Parents need to get on board with this too, > respect teachers and administrators need to stop bending for parents and back their > personnel. > > > On 6/28/09, rich wrote: >> On 6/28/09, mark wrote: >>> On 6/28/09, Miss Independent wrote: >>> >>> >>> And yet we determine a district's performance based upon >>> standardized testing. In my state, a district and it's [its] >> students are evaluated upon test scores, and only test scores. >> Still, this is >>> what the people want. They want hard numbers where they can keep >>> score. They want some way where they can rank districts and >>> students. It's much the same way with the TI test. >> >> Actually, it's not at all. >> >> Standardized test: measures knowledge which can be normed against a >> standard. Tests the content taught in schools. Are made common >> knowledge. Scores are sometimes made public. Much time is spent >> preparing students. The ultimate goal is for all students to do >> well. >> >> Standardized interviews: measures judgements, values, beliefs, and >> reactions which cannot be accurately normed against a standard. The >> content of the questions does not match the content taught as >> professional knowledge. They are kept secret, and the people taking >> them are not allowed to know their score. There is no preparation >> allowed. The ultimate goal is for only a few to perform well. >> >> While we strive to eliminate as much bias as possible from >> standardized tests because they are mandatory, the TI is completely >> designed to discriminate against something. And that something >> could be affected by cultural, race, or background. Would you like >> a fluently bilingual Chinese math teacher? Wouldn't that be a great >> asset to your math department? Do you think the TI might present a >> little problem in hiring that person? >> >> Is the TI an interview or a test? I think that is the legal >> question. If it is a test, and white males over 40 consistently get >> screened out, it's discriminatory and breaks federal law. We might >> not know how it discriminates, but if we look at the demographics of >> those who "pass," they better look like the demographic of the whole >> population who takes it. >> >> >>>> Complaints aside, does anyone have any test taking advice specific >>>> to the TeacherInsight? >>> >>> If you mean the Teacher Insight on-line survey which is usually >>> given as part of an on-line application, I would suggest selecting >>> the most student centered response which focuses on all students >>> learning. Never pick the response that focuses on the teacher's >>> thoughts or feelings. >>> >> I always, always do this, and it hasn't helped me. But it's still >> the only advice that I have ever heard. >> >> Is there an administrator version of the TI? > I have no idea what the T1 entails, however
Posts on this thread, including this one
- TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/23/09, by Miss Independent.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/25/09, by fight the test.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/25/09, by Miss Independent.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/26/09, by ftt.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/27/09, by Mark.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/28/09, by Miss Independent.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/28/09, by mark.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/28/09, by rich.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/28/09, by mark.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/29/09, by rich.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/29/09, by Marina.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/29/09, by Teach277.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/30/09, by Jodi.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/30/09, by Jodi.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/30/09, by Jodi.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/30/09, by Jodi.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 6/30/09, by mark.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/01/09, by Miss Independent.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/01/09, by rich.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/01/09, by mark.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/02/09, by rich.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/03/09, by Tired teacher.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/03/09, by Finally someone else who is teacher centered!! I feel better.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/05/09, by I'm just curious.
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/05/09, by joe f .
- Re: TeacherInsight - Thoughts & Advice, 7/06/09, by mark.
|