SUBSCRIBE  |  PREFERENCES MY LINKS:              chat center STATES  |  GRADE LEVEL  |  SUBJECTS

Accelerated Reading Teachers Chatboard

TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Search Teachers.Net
Advanced

Advertise with Teachers.Net - Rate Card, Demographics, etc. Live Chat - Online Teacher Meetings and Workshops Harry Wong - Effective Teaching Teachers.Net Gazette - Articles by Teachers, For Teachers Mailrings - Teacher Email  Discussion Lists Teaching Jobs - Free Job Listings for Classroom Teachers Teacher Classified Ads K-12 Classroom Projects Lesson Plans - Over 4000 Free Lesson Plans Teacher Chatboards - Discussion Forums for Teachers Teacher Chat - Over 150 Teacher Discussion Topics
Click here
next post skip topic



Print | Share | Report Post

    Re: Get training mentally must be absolutely's problem
    Posted by absolutely on 9/27/08

    At least I acknowledged receipt of the message sent by Ima and you. You
    do not intend to try to understand my perspective at all. That's okay,
    you don't have to and I won't call you names for disagreeing with you
    either. Take Care.

    On 9/27/08, Deb ms/IA wrote:
    > Where did you offer any solution to the OP problem? Where did you
    > offer any ideas on how to look into and change AR in a school and give
    > advice for parents? You offered anger at the AR program and on ima
    > and now on me. Nowhere did I see you offer any solutions to make
    > learning better.
    >
    > If you come here and whine and fuss and offer no solutions to problems
    > that makes you part of the problem. You were given solutions and
    > things to look into to make changes and you scoffed them off and
    > insulted the messengers.
    >
    > I have been a parent of AR first and now the teacher of AR. I can
    > offer what has worked for me. That's all I did. You are the one full
    > of anger and not accepting help to make changes.
    >
    > Grading AR does not make it punitive. It makes it one factor of many
    > in a reading curriculum. It increases accountability and it is
    > assessed thus meets standards. AR is not a willy nilly program
    and
    > has merits to helping students (you said so your self).
    >
    > I never claimed to be right or wrong about AR. I gave my advice
    based
    > on my 21 years of experience. Use it or not but don't whine and
    > complain blaming everything on AR.
    >
    > Any parent has far more credibility when they are willing to work with
    > the teacher to make appropriate changes in a learning environment. If
    > you came to me with valid documentation that I was doing something
    > wrong I would check it out and see if I was. You being a teacher who
    > uses the program would have far more influence in making change than a
    > mad mom shaking a finger in my face making accusations and with no
    > data.
    >
    > I don't care if you disagree with me. But I don't work at your
    > daughter's school and I can't make changes for that school. So why
    > are you mad at me, Ima and AR? So go fix that ms or back off.
    AR is
    > not responsible for that ms program. Again your anger is misplaced in
    > the wrong direction.
    >
    > So get over it or change it but that's not gonna happen here on this
    > board.
    >
    > Deb ms/IA
    >
    >
    > On 9/27/08, absolutely wrote:
    >> It's funny how your solution to my daughter's ms is for me to go
    >> in and tell them how to fix their program by educating myself on
    >> all the intricacies of AR. As a parent, that is NOT my job. My
    >> job is to protect my child. Just because you love AR and have
    >> found a way to implement it to the benefit of every single child
    >> in your school does not mean other schools or teachers are at your
    >> level of understanding.
    >>
    >> Just because I offer parents and teachers who are experiencing
    >> troubles with the AR program different advice than yours does not
    >> mean that I am right and you are wrong or vice versa. Parents and
    >> teachers need to know that making AR punitive in ANY way stifles
    >> the love of reading.
    >>
    >> My "anger issue" is not my daughter's ms. It is with any program,
    >> AR included, that uses tracking as a way to pigeonhole kids. I
    >> agree that most of the problems noted on this chatboard have to do
    >> with AR being misused. With that being said, fixing the problem
    >> has several approaches. I approach my advice based on an
    >> overarching theme of incentive only rather than anything punitive
    >> to keep the love of reading paramount as the purpose of having an
    >> AR program.
    >>
    >> I'm sure you know as well as I do that any parent trying to get a
    >> school to change a whole program for their child is ludicrous.
    >> However, a parent can get a program modified for their child.
    >> Making sure the program is not perceived as punitive by the parent
    >> and student is a reasonable goal for a parent to pursue with the
    >> school. If the school is unwilling to listen (and many are
    >> because it involves a shift in their thinking or procedures) then
    >> insisting your child be excused from AR becomes a parent's best
    >> option. They must not be saddled with the rehab that will follow
    >> if a child learns to hate reading when this result is completely
    >> avoidable.
    >>
    >> As far as not posting on this board because I choose to disagree
    >> with you, I believe that is the purpose of a chatboard. We offer
    >> our ideas and the OP chooses to do what they want to do.

    RESPOND TO THIS POST START A NEW THREAD RETURN TO CHATBOARD

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • Using AR for reading grades--is it right?, 9/25/08, by Wendy.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right?, 9/25/08, by absolutely not!.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right?, 9/25/08, by Yes, it is correct.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right?, 9/25/08, by Ima Teacher, adding to the last post.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right?, 9/25/08, by absolutely not with even better reason.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right? to absolutely, 9/26/08, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right?, 9/26/08, by Compromise....
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right? to absolutely, 9/26/08, by Wendy.
  • Re: Using AR for reading grades--is it right? to absolutely, 9/26/08, by for Wendy from absolutely.
  • Re: Wow, "absolutely" . . . , 9/26/08, by Ima Teacher, who has obviously pissed somebody off.
  • Re: More for "absolutely" about trainings . . . , 9/26/08, by Ima Teacher, who just can't leave well enough alone tonight.
  • Re: Get training mentality is not only Ima Teacher's, 9/26/08, by absolutely.
  • Re: Teacher motivation works wonders, 9/26/08, by I Teach too.
  • Re: I wave the white flag of surrender. , 9/26/08, by Ima Teacher, who's wasting her time here.
  • Re: Get training mentality is not only Ima Teacher's, 9/27/08, by Deb ms/IA NOT surrendering to absolutely's ignorance.
  • Re: Get training mentality must be Deb's as well, 9/27/08, by absolutely - who feels sorry for her.
  • Re: Get training mentality must be Deb's as well, 9/27/08, by LOLOL!!! You're nuts!.
  • Re: Ignore the troll. , 9/27/08, by Deb & Ima know their stuff.
  • Re: Get training mentality must be Deb's as well, 9/27/08, by absolutely.
  • Re: Ignore the troll. , 9/27/08, by Deb is civil?.
  • Re: Get training mentally must be absolutely's problem, 9/27/08, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: to anon troll, 9/27/08, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: Get training mentally must be absolutely's problem, 9/27/08, by absolutely.
  • Re: to anon troll, 9/27/08, by deb is civil?.
  • Re: Holy Smokes! This used to be a good board. Now it's , 9/27/08, by just as bad as the main board. .

     
     

You are on the ACCELERATED READING CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

Other Chatboards in this Category...

Check out our latest FREE Lesson Plans...
 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
Click here
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lesson Plans Contacts PR AdvertiseSite Map
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.