New Jobs on Teachers.Net


IDEAS
Zarqa


LIFT Pre-College Progr...
College Park


Perspectives Charter S...
Chicago

AJO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIS...
Ajo

    Re: To Carolyn
    Posted by: Deb ms/IA on 11/01/09
    (23) Comments

    Carolyn your posts force me to ask if you are a real teacher. This board
    does get people who post as teachers just to raise a stink. Your posts
    reflect a real issue of problem solving on your part. Your expertise is
    in writing and speech and not in reading. I to am HQT! I have my
    reading specialists and am certified preschool-12 for reading. I have a
    bachelor of science with endorsements in early childhood, reading and can
    teach K-8. I also have 23 years of experience to back up my knowledge.
    !! of those years specializing in middle school reading. So I know my
    students and I know there books!

    You really do need to keep up on literature for your students, monitor
    their reading, ask questions through weekly status of the class
    conferences with each student in your class. You really need to sit down
    with the AR person and figure out what you need to do to get on board.
    Make a list of questions and ask for an after school time sit down with
    this person to go over this problem. If the school won't help seek out
    AR training on your own. It really is beneficial. I would kill to have
    AR back in my school but due to budget cuts it was one of theings to go.

    Deb ms/IA

    On 11/01/09, Carolyn wrote:

    > Finally, I suggest you do not make false judgment calls and question my
    > teaching status. I am certified as an HQT teacher and have my state
    > license as evidence. I am also a teacher consultant for the National
    > Writing Project, have my Bachelors degree in Speech Communications,
    > have worked as a writing tutor, on line proofreader and editorial
    > assistant. Anything else you need to supply the evidence that I am
    > qualified to teach this subject?


    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • NO points for 60% or below, 9/07/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/07/09, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/16/09, by Tyler.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/16/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/26/09, by Carolyn.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/26/09, by I don't get you Carolyn.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/27/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/27/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: sorry carolyn- re: NO points for 60% or below, 9/27/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: To Sheila, 9/28/09, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: To Sheila, 9/28/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: To Sheila, 10/31/09, by The RIGHT Carolyn.
  • Re: To Sheila, 11/01/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: To Sheila, 11/01/09, by Carolyn.
  • Re: To Sheila, 11/01/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: To Carolyn, 11/01/09, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: To Carolyn, 11/01/09, by Sheila.
  • Re: To Carolyn, 11/01/09, by Carolyn.
  • Re: To Carolyn, 11/01/09, by Deb ms/IA.
  • Re: To Carolyn, 11/01/09, by Carolyn.
  • Re: To Sheila, 11/02/09, by Jake.
  • Re: To Sheila, 9/02/12, by Gi GI.
  • Re: To Sheila, 9/03/12, by Sheila.