On 7/14/05, Cheryle wrote:
> On 7/14/05, A wrote:
>> I am looking at DIBELS as a potential tool to use in my first
>> grade classroom after attending a fluency PD this summer. The
>> teacher leading the session, and several of the teachers in the
>> session really liked this assessment, which is required for the
>> Kentucky Reading First schools. (My school is not a Reading
>> First school.) We are required to administer the DRA, and I
>> think I will try DIBELS this year too. It is available free of
>> charge from the DIBELS website.
>>
>> I am interested in any feedback from folks who have used this
>> assessment - pro and con. Please don't spare me your real
>> opinion just because I am thinking of using it. I really want to
>> know.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> This past year was the first that we used DIBELS in our district.
> It has been mandated by the state. It can be time consuming,
> especially in the grades K-2. Third grade only has the oral reading
> fluency test. I used it to help me pinpoint areas where particular
> children needed help. However, my co=workers and I found faults
> with it as well. I would recommend going to the University of
> Oregon website (Official DIBELS Homepage.
> http://dibels.uoregon.edu/) and read the technical papers listed
> there, especially Technical Report #10 by Good and Kaminsky.
>
> My curiosity was aroused when we found that students followed a
> pattern of pass-fail-pass-fail and so on. TR #10 explains how the
> creators of DIBELS leveled the passages. It makes no sense to me.
>
> For one of my Master's classes I wrote a paper on my findings in my
> classroom. I would be glad to email it to you if you are interested
> in reading it.
I am studying for the National Boards. I would love to read the paper
you wrote on it. Thanks,
Maureen