On 7/14/05, A wrote:
> I am looking at DIBELS as a potential tool to use in my first
> grade classroom after attending a fluency PD this summer. The
> teacher leading the session, and several of the teachers in the
> session really liked this assessment, which is required for the
> Kentucky Reading First schools. (My school is not a Reading
> First school.) We are required to administer the DRA, and I
> think I will try DIBELS this year too. It is available free of
> charge from the DIBELS website.
>
> I am interested in any feedback from folks who have used this
> assessment - pro and con. Please don't spare me your real
> opinion just because I am thinking of using it. I really want to
> know.
>
> Thanks!
This past year was the first that we used DIBELS in our district.
It has been mandated by the state. It can be time consuming,
especially in the grades K-2. Third grade only has the oral reading
fluency test. I used it to help me pinpoint areas where particular
children needed help. However, my co=workers and I found faults
with it as well. I would recommend going to the University of
Oregon website (Official DIBELS Homepage.
http://dibels.uoregon.edu/) and read the technical papers listed
there, especially Technical Report #10 by Good and Kaminsky.
My curiosity was aroused when we found that students followed a
pattern of pass-fail-pass-fail and so on. TR #10 explains how the
creators of DIBELS leveled the passages. It makes no sense to me.
For one of my Master's classes I wrote a paper on my findings in my
classroom. I would be glad to email it to you if you are interested
in reading it.