|
|

Re: Dibels reading assess.
Posted by Ginny on 9/03/06
On 4/04/06, Margaret Turner wrote: > On 3/04/06, Kathy wrote: >> I am an administrator looking at better ways to diagnose reading >> difficulties for our special education children in the elementary >> grades. We currently use observation survy in the early grades and >> frankly, it is hit and miss for children thereafter relative to specific >> skills. This leaves the inclusion class teachers struggling to teach >> without a clear understanding of what needs to be supported, etc. >> Anything you can tell me would help inform our team - thanks! >> >> >> On 1/11/06, Kim wrote: >>> Maureen, We are also considering DIBELS as an assessment tool. I >>> would be very interested in reading your paper. Please e-mail it to >>> me. >>> Thanks, >>> Kim >>> >>> On 12/08/05, Maureen wrote: >>>> On 7/14/05, Cheryle wrote: >>>>> On 7/14/05, A wrote: >>>>>> I am looking at DIBELS as a potential tool to use in my first >>>>>> grade classroom after attending a fluency PD this summer. The >>>>>> teacher leading the session, and several of the teachers in the >>>>>> session really liked this assessment, which is required for the >>>>>> Kentucky Reading First schools. (My school is not a Reading >>>>>> First school.) We are required to administer the DRA, and I >>>>>> think I will try DIBELS this year too. It is available free of >>>>>> charge from the DIBELS website. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am interested in any feedback from folks who have used this >>>>>> assessment - pro and con. Please don't spare me your real >>>>>> opinion just because I am thinking of using it. I really want to >>>>>> know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> This past year was the first that we used DIBELS in our district. >>>>> It has been mandated by the state. It can be time consuming, >>>>> especially in the grades K-2. Third grade only has the oral reading >>>>> fluency test. I used it to help me pinpoint areas where particular >>>>> children needed help. However, my co=workers and I found faults >>>>> with it as well. I would recommend going to the University of >>>>> Oregon website (Official DIBELS Homepage. >>>>> http://dibels.uoregon.edu/) and read the technical papers listed >>>>> there, especially Technical Report #10 by Good and Kaminsky. >>>>> >>>>> My curiosity was aroused when we found that students followed a >>>>> pattern of pass-fail-pass-fail and so on. TR #10 explains how the >>>>> creators of DIBELS leveled the passages. It makes no sense to me. >>>>> >>>>> For one of my Master's classes I wrote a paper on my findings in my >>>>> classroom. I would be glad to email it to you if you are interested >>>>> in reading it. >>>> >>>> I am studying for the National Boards. I would love to read the >>> paper >>>> you wrote on it. Thanks, >>>> Maureen > > Hi, I am Margaret Turner. I'm a reading coach in Florida. We've been > using the DIBELS Assessment for about 5 years now. We find it to be > invaluable in predicting success and failure in reading. What we had to > learn was that the dibels is assessing the reading process itself. The > reading process develops the way the dibels assesses; phonemic and > phonological awareness,the alphabetic principle, phonics, and finally oral > reading fluency. If we can help the children develop the skills in each > one of those categories, the goal of reading fluency will happen. From > there, our real goal, comprehension will occur. It's a process. The > children can't skip any or the processes and be successful readers. The > DIBELS allows us to see where they are in the process and address that > area of weakness. Usually, it works very well. > Sometimes we have students that can't seem to get it no matter what you do. > I'm looking for an assessment for those students.
|