Search Teachers.Net
Classroom Discipline Chatboard
NEW POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST

Childcare   Preschool   Kindergarten   Elementary   First Grade   Second Grade   Third Grade   Fourth Grade   Fifth Grade   Middle School   High School   College

4Blocks   Art   Building Blocks   Computers   ESL/Language   Games   Geography   Health   History   Literature   Math   Music   Physical Education   Reading/Writing   Science   Special Education   Social Studies

AL   AK   AZ   AR   CA   CO   CT   DE   DC   FL   GA   HI   ID   IL   IN   IA   KS   KY   LA    ME   MD   MA   MI   MN   MS   MO   MT   NE   NV   NH   NJ   NM   NY   NC   ND   OH   OK   OR   PA   RI   SC   SD   TN   TX   UT   VT   VA   WA   WV   WI   WY

Teacher Recipes



    Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...)
    Posted by: Steve on 10/29/09

    On 10/19/09, Tom wrote:
    > One of the main points Patrick Welsh (teacher) makes in that
    > piece is this: The reason African American kids (as a group)
    > display an educational achievement gap is that they don't
    > have fathers at home.
    >
    > I propose that this is likely a case of correlation rather
    > than causation. Here's why...
    >
    > 1. If you did a study of ALL kids who are growing up in
    > fatherless homes, this hypotheses would suggest findings
    > commensurate with current African American achievement. So,
    > MOST kids without fathers - regardless of socio-economic
    > status or ethnic identity - would have similar test scores. I
    > seriously doubt that this is true. My guess that the
    > achievement of fatherless kids will break down according to
    > socio-economic strati, and not ethnic or racial. (Anyone want
    > to research this?)

    Punishment is the weakest argument we have on the table for this
    problem.

    I would totally agree that the breakdown in the family and society
    in general has a profound influence on the achievement gap. But,
    and this is a big but,,,There are too many factors to just say
    it's one thing or another.

    For instance, it can be as simple as a breakdown in linguistics.
    Language has a great deal to do with to failure to develop the
    cognitive thinking skills necessary for learning at a level
    necessary to score well on state achievement tests. There are
    also indications that the language used on state achievement tests
    do not match the linguistics used within some ethnic groups making
    it impossible for these groups to score well. The language used
    at home, on tests and by the educated professional do not match in
    many cases.

    It has also been show that the number of professionals in a
    neighborhood has a drastic influence on achievement in school and
    dropout rates.

    The achievement gap among students in poverty is stretched during
    the summer months. Students form upper and middle class homes
    continue to learn (constant stimulation) during the summer months
    while students form poverty tend to be on their own and stalled.
    It's been suggested in many studies that most students learn at a
    comparable rate during the school months but lose those gains
    during summer months. This compounds over the 14 years of basic
    education.

    We would also need to examine factors like generational poverty
    and situational poverty. I could say too much here so I'll just
    leave it for now.

    I could also point out that we lack basic education for children
    on norms and hidden rules within our society that govern
    expectations and behavior. While these may be understood in most
    middle and upper class homes (they write the rules after all),
    they are far from understood by children in lower class
    situations. There's a real need for this basic education in the
    lower grades.

    All of these examples depend on patterns and all patterns, no
    matter how you look at them have exceptions. The best thing we
    could ever hope for in our schools is to teach children from a
    very young age all the hidden rules and expectations that will
    allow them to be successful in life. We can't punish them for not
    knowing and valuing these rules but we cannot excuse them either.
    In the end, it's up to each educator to do what he/she can do to
    support them (Tom will like this), give them assistance at every
    turn and develop a desire to set high expectations.

    I write about this in my book and to me, there is really only one
    answer that fixes the problem.

    "There are no easy answers to the troubles that teachers and
    society face. Social decay in the United States is not going away
    anytime soon. Until we admit to ourselves that improving family
    and protecting values is the ultimate answer, education in America
    will continue to fail for a certain number of students who, for
    whatever reason, have not had their basic needs met in a
    meaningful way by the family unit.

    There have always been shifts with the curve of success in this
    world, and there will always be vicissitudes with any society. In
    the end, we have to look within ourselves to seek the greater
    good. When we seek to improve society by walking away from
    self-serving behavior, we step one rung higher on the ladder to
    improving the lives of everyone around us. Without realizing and
    affirming Maslow’s genius, we are just beating nails with the same
    old hammer.

    If you remember one thing from what I write here, remember this:
    If no need is “left behind,” no child will ever be “left behind.”
    This educational plan costs nothing and enriches the lives of
    everyone who participates."

    Steve

    Superior Education


    Share This Post | Report This Post
    Next Post >>

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • check this out - Washington Post opinion piece by veteran te, 10/19/09, by pixie.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/19/09, by Tom.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/19/09, by pixie.
  • Re: WA Post response (4 Pixie), 10/19/09, by Tom.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/20/09, by DL.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/21/09, by pixie.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/27/09, by Leah.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/27/09, by Tom.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/29/09, by Steve.
  • Re: WA Post response (Obama was fatherless...), 10/29/09, by Steve.

     
     

You are on the DISCIPLINE CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

Other Chatboards in this Category...
  Interest Group Center
 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
Click here
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lesson Plans Contacts PR Advertise
  © 1996 - 2009. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.