It seemed weak in academic vocabulary pertaining to
literature, and in literary analysis and process writing. (I
do not have the book in front of me, but I think this was the
issue for us.) Also if I remember correctly the lowest level
does not teach basic reading skills which many of our
students need. Like I said in my other post, I think it's
good material, but not comprehensive enough - mostly lacking
in specific aspects of reading and literature.

On 6/16/09, Dawn wrote:
> I was just wondering if anyone uses Focus on Grammar as
> their main classroom text. Earlier, I posted about
> textbooks and someone mentioned that Focus on Grammar would
> not work as a comprehensive program. However, I'm comparing
> it to Visions and finding the content more appealing and
> that it has more practice opportunities for students. Just
> wondering if anyone has any positive or negative
> experiences to share.
> Thanks,
> Dawn

Share This Post | Report This Post

Next Post >>

Posts on this thread, including this one