|
|

Re: IMPMath
Posted by not popular here on 5/10/08
On 5/10/08, Elaine wrote: > This sounds more like an issue with the teacher than the > curriculum. I honestly get very tired of math instruction > being characterized solely by the materials used rather than > the teacher who teachers the materials. How well trained they > are and what educational philosophies they bring into the > classroom. > > The authors of IMP NEVER intended for students to "discover" > everything. The purpose is to present students with what seems > to be an overwhelming problem, show them that it CAN be broken > down into smaller parts and each part be studied seperately. > The "jumping around" of topics is intentional because it shows > that not every problem fits into a nice little box with a > label on it. Too many kids in sequential math programs have no > idea how to solve problems without knowing in advance what > section of the book they are studying at the time. Taken out > of that context for them (like SATs) and they are clueless. > IMP counteracts that phenomenon. Are you saying that SAT math problems *do* give the context, or *don't*? Because if you mean that SAT problems are a good test of whether kids can do out-of-context problems, I have to say that the kids I know who hate IMP (but are in fact very good at math) absolutely are *acing* SAT-type stuff. The same student also wrote: "I think that IMP could be used successfully with a teacher who went over everything very clearly, and lectured on the subject. Actually, the best CMP experience I had was Mrs. [name omitted] in Pre-Integrated. Although we used the CMP books, she clearly lectured to the class on the topics, to make sure that everyone had the same information. However, I would much prefer to use a classic textbook, and I frequently have discussions with other 9th and 10th graders expressing similar sentiments." This is a student who was also quite successful on a very competitive math team, by the way -- a still better indication of her problem-solving ability.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- IMPMath, 5/01/08, by Bill.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/03/08, by Elaine.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/05/08, by Pragmatic.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/08/08, by Elaine.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/08/08, by not popular here.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/08/08, by DSF/NJ.
- Re: IMPMath/ Math in general, 5/09/08, by Donna/WI.
- Re: IMPMath/ Math in general, 5/09/08, by Pragmatic.
- Re: IMPMath/ Math in general, 5/09/08, by DSF/NJ.
- Re: IMPMath/ Math in general, 5/10/08, by Donna/WI.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/10/08, by Elaine.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/10/08, by not popular here.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/10/08, by Elaine.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/10/08, by smarkham01.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/12/08, by Interactive Math Program.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/12/08, by DSF/NJ.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/13/08, by not popular here.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/14/08, by smarkham01.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/15/08, by not popular here.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/15/08, by smarkham01.
- Re: IMPMath, 5/15/08, by not popular here.
| June: The 30 Days of Teachers.Net (Introduction) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|