| Jobs for Teachers |
|
Assessment Writer
Key Data Systems Lake Elsinore, CA |
|
Chicago Teacher Residency
Academy for Urban School Ldrshp Chicago, IL |
|
Teach English in China with Disney English
Disney English White Plains, NY |
|
Activity Specialist (Leader)
ESF Summer Camps Bryn Mawr, PA |
|
teacher
Steps Academy, Inc Arcadia, CA |
|
English Teachers
Golden Overseas ESL Academy Quebec, Canada |
| More Jobs Like These... |
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/08/12, by I don't think you understand what this new flap is about.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/08/12, by CA Teacher.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/08/12, by Really? Which section of the bill says this?.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/08/12, by The way the regulations are written .
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by Zack Beauchamp on "The Daily Dish".
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by Deb ms/IA.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by jme.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by I agree with jme.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by farm subsidies aren't in the constitution either, but we.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by Deb ms/IA.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by TO: Deb ms/IA, a question.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by well that's the answer, if you don't want health care don't.
Re: Jme, a question, 2/09/12, by curious.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by PAG.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by I'm not sure that whether or not parishoners .
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Jo.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by Chan.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by Chan.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by Chan.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by PAG.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by PAG.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by which has nothing at all to do with this thread..
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by The practice of child marriage is illegal but some relegions.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by To: practice of child marriage poster.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by taxpayers subsidize deb's pig farm but.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by to PAG: 98% of Catholic women use birth control. nfm.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by TWENTY-EIGHT states already require organizations that offer.
Re: Pill versus Christianity is not what this is about., 2/09/12, by double trouble.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Condoms are not a good alternative for the women - they.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by jmho5.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Chan.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Chan.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by What do you mean a woman has no control?????.
Re: Jme, a question, 2/09/12, by jme.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by saying no doesn't always work.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by If saying no doesn't work, then.
Re: Jme, a question, 2/09/12, by Thanks, then I would say that.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Hmmm...odd that "religious" employers.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by jmho5.
Re: Somewhere in America, a women is raped every two minutes, 2/09/12, by how nice that this doesn't happen in your world.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by on that single payer system.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Not good enough.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Not familiar with that at all.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by PAG.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by As already stated, 28 states already have this rule in force.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by What kind of health insurance do they carry now?.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by Kat.
Re: Another way to look at the "pill vrs Christianity" mess, 2/09/12, by If I had congestive heart failure.
Re: "pill vrs Christianity", 2/09/12, by Anon5.
Re: "pill vs. Christianity", 2/09/12, by Amen, sister! and, "Did you know that, by federal rule .
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by The facts in this are absolutely true and one of the reasons.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by AM.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by men.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by pixie.
Re: d rugs, 2/08/12, by in my opinion.
Re: d rugs, 2/08/12, by pixie.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by MacQ.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by Chan.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/08/12, by hahaha.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie to hahaha.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by I see no "decades long warehousing" of .
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by to hahaha: Correlation does not imply causation. nfm.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Mass incarceration in this country, 2/09/12, by pixie.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by florida teacher.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by Deb ms/IA.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by to AM --.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by beachy.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by AM.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by AM.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by Well, let's hope not.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by PAG.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by Well, they could have NOT hired her.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by PAG.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by Anon5.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by candlelight.
Re: Karen Handel still doesn't get it , 2/08/12, by PAG.
Re: Yet again, Santorum surges from behind!, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: Yet again, Santorum surges from behind!, 2/08/12, by Oops! Santorum also swept Colorado.
Re: Is Obama going to keep Biden the Buffoon on the ticket?, 2/08/12, by Where did you read that he has a new VP in mind? nfm.
Re: Is Obama going to keep Biden the Buffoon on the ticket?, 2/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Is Obama going to keep Biden the Buffoon on the ticket?, 2/08/12, by I've got a vote and I know how to use it..
Re: What inflation?, 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: What inflation?, 2/07/12, by Sally to T E C.
Re: What inflation?, 2/07/12, by According to the Consumer Price Index, .
Re: What inflation?, 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by The Consumer Price Index doesn't agree, tec.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by Our local grocery store has a coupon for Breyer's ice cream .
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by You have choices, Jo. Buy cheaper ice cream or change your.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: What inflation?, 2/08/12, by choices have absolutely NOTHING to do .
Re: What inflation?, 2/09/12, by Sally to Jo.
Re: What inflation?, 2/09/12, by Are there farmer's markets where you live?.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/07/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: What TEC is trying to say: Buy a sailboat, 2/07/12, by hahaha.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by To: Jo.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by Who has, tec? .
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by Jo.
Re: TEC missed it again, 2/08/12, by hahaha.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by Not All you did was lift sentences.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: TEC missed it again, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: TEC missed it again, 2/09/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by Jo.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by Jo.
Re: To AW The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by Becky.
Re: To AW The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by Jo.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by LOLOL, tec.
Re: To AW The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by This was funny!!!.
Re: TEC missed it again, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: To AW The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by to this is funny.
Re: To AW The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: The "global warmers" missed it again, 2/09/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: LOL ETS, your Birthers group meets over margaritas?, 2/07/12, by Uh Oh! Maybe one less margarita would be a good idea.
Re: Yes, we "truthers" meet over margaritas., 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: ETS, the attempt beginning '03 was by a REPUBLICAN! LOL, 2/07/12, by In 2003 REPUB Sen. Hatch tried to change from nat'l born.
Re: ETS, the 03 attempt was by a REPUBLICAN! Good job Uh Oh, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: ETS, the attempt beginning '03 was by a REPUBLICAN! LOL, 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: ETS, the 03 attempt was by a REPUBLICAN! Good job Uh Oh, 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: ETS, the attempt beginning '03 was by a REPUBLICAN! LOL, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: ETS...Please Get Off the Sauce!, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: ETS, the attempt beginning '03 was by a REPUBLICAN! LOL, 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: jobless rate at 3-yr low after 1.2 million disappeared, 2/05/12, by hahaha.
Re: "US jobless rate at 3-yr low as payrolls surge" Reuters, 2/05/12, by I actually would agree.
Re: Unemployment rate drops AGAIN, exceeds forecast (Bloombe, 2/05/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Unemployment rate drops AGAIN, exceeds forecast (Bloombe, 2/07/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: Unemployment rate drops AGAIN, exceeds forecast (Bloombe, 2/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Unemployment rate drops AGAIN, exceeds forecast (Bloombe, 2/07/12, by Not ETS, but.
Re: Unemployment rate drops AGAIN, exceeds forecast (Bloombe, 2/07/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Doing the math of Obama's deficits, 2/04/12, by Doing the math.
Re: Doing the math of Obama's deficits, 2/04/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: Doing the math of Obama's deficits, 2/04/12, by Add the annual deficits.
Re: Doing the math of Obama's deficits, 2/04/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: Doing the math of Obama's deficits, 2/04/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: Doing the math of Obama's deficits, 2/04/12, by Spending DID increase, it wasn't just decreased.
Re: The opposite might be true..., 2/04/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: The opposite might be true..., 2/04/12, by No, I don't think so. .
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by to micromanage any of these programs? Sheesh! nfm.
Re: The opposite might be true..., 2/04/12, by AW to Chalkmaven.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by Why not? He's trying to micromanage so many other things. N.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by time and micromanage? Well that would interfere with .
Re: Well that would interfere ...., 2/04/12, by Anon5.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by Bush spent 1,020 days of his presidency on vacation. and.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by could you clarify.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by EVERY president deals with matters of state on vacation, not.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/04/12, by hahaha.
Re: The opposite might be true..., 2/04/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/05/12, by No answer to my question?.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/05/12, by Already answered. Try to keep up. nfm.
Re: What makes any of you think President Obama has the time, 2/05/12, by Silly question, thus no answers. nfm.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by I do agree - This was trolling.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by Nino, what part of my posts will .
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/02/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/03/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/03/12, by Sally.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/03/12, by A lot of people overseas follow US politics.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/03/12, by I didn't see any "huge surprise" by anyone.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/03/12, by Nino/CaN.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/03/12, by About your trolling???.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by "a lot of people" -- how many is that? nm.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by LOL...take the number of people who read this board.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by I think a lot pay attention to the general election. .
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Amerikaanse toestanden.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Interesting source of global opinion about US politics.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by You're most welcome.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by LOLOL.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Speaking of which, you've responded to the wrong post.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by ?? Nobody's expecting you to pay attention to anything.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by No, I didn't. .
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by LOL! I see. Well again, if the link doesn't interest you.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Wow, thank you so much.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by ROFLMFAO!!!!!.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/04/12, by Oh, you're THAT lady...now this makes more sense.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/04/12, by prince.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/04/12, by Wrong, prince.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/04/12, by SO good to see you on the board, Prince!! Don't be a .
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/04/12, by Republicans sure don't seem very excited about voting.
Re: Such a hoot!, 2/05/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by Did you read Prince's response?.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by According to foxnews.com, approximately 10,000 fewer.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by To "Did you read" I find it amusing that you felt compelled.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by Not in primaries or caucuses of foregone conclusions.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by In 2008, Romney "coasted to an easy victory" in Nevada. So.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by Oh, there's a definite "anyone but Obama" faction.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by Halftime, so will respond. .
Re: Such a hoot! I Think the dems are worried..., 2/05/12, by hahaha.
Re: Such a hoot! Wow Nino! I Think They're Worried..., 2/05/12, by LOL...Didn't know we were arguing. Enjoy the game. nfm.
Re: Always at Your Service, 2/01/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Always at Your Service, 2/01/12, by Big Deal.
Re: I am still waiting for that $3.00 and less gas predicted, 2/01/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: I am still waiting for that $3.00 and less gas predicted, 2/04/12, by Sally to ETS.
Re: I am still waiting for that $3.00 and less gas predicted, 2/04/12, by Sally to ETS.
Re: Perhaps whomever you're hoping to start an argument with , 2/04/12, by is off living life, unaware of your immediate needs? nfm.
Re: I am still waiting for that $3.00 and less gas predicted, 2/05/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 1/31/12, by hahaha.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 1/31/12, by You're absolutely right, T.E.C..
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 1/31/12, by hahaha.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee? Oh please!!, 1/31/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/01/12, by This is about the 50th explanation.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/01/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/01/12, by hahaha.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/01/12, by hahaha.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/01/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/01/12, by hahaha.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/02/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: From Climate Change to Honeybee????, 2/02/12, by Nothing you said, tec.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by AW.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by Investments, aaahhhh yes. .
Re: Obama's idea of , 1/29/12, by "investing" in education .
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by You need ro learn to count, tec.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by hahaha.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by hahaha.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/29/12, by tec's answers.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/30/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Not only are you losing the ability to count, 1/30/12, by but your entire short term memory appears .
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/31/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/31/12, by hahaha.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/31/12, by It was a hare brained tangent.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/31/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Investing is the way out!, 1/31/12, by hahaha.
Re: Will this be obama's downfall?, 1/29/12, by If not his downfall, it certaily was one of the.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline, 1/29/12, by from your article.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/29/12, by Anon5.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/29/12, by Sally to Anon5.
Re: Anon5, 1/29/12, by A question . . ..
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/29/12, by Sally thinks the Cornell University study has no validity on.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/30/12, by It is indeed a luxury.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/30/12, by Anon5.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/31/12, by Sally to "Sally thinks..." Are you psycic now? Who rattled.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/31/12, by "Psychic" (correction) No need for "Spelling Police": .
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline---this is what I heard, 1/31/12, by "Psychic" (correction) No need for "Spelling Police": .
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline, 2/03/12, by AW -- related to your comments.
Re: First Nations oppose pipeline, 2/03/12, by No time right now, but look at.
Re: Obama's downfall? AW... Ever Heard of TAR SAND?, 2/04/12, by prince.
Re: Obama's downfall? AW... Ever Heard of TAR SAND?, 2/04/12, by Pro-Keystone XL folks on this board have been given.
Re: Obama's downfall? AW... Ever Heard of TAR SAND?, 2/05/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Obama's downfall? AW... Ever Heard of TAR SAND?, 2/05/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Obama's downfall? AW... Ever Heard of TAR SAND?, 2/05/12, by hahaha.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting here, help tamp down lies , 2/05/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: ETS, wishing the president dead is not approp dialog-nfm, 2/05/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting here, help tamp down lies , 2/05/12, by hahaha.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting here, help tamp down lies , 2/05/12, by It's a spiral, hahaha.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting here, help tamp down lies , 2/05/12, by LOL...come on now.
Re: ETS, wishing the president dead is not approp dialog-nfm, 2/05/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: ETS, wishing the president dead is not approp dialog-nfm, 2/05/12, by When in hell did anyone wish death on GWB?.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting... To Uh Oh, 2/05/12, by prince.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting... To Uh Oh, 2/06/12, by hahaha.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by Anon5.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by This was kind of funny.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by Anon5.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting... To Uh Oh, 2/06/12, by Dangerous??????.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by Becky.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by Becky, if you look at.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by Anon5.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by hahaha.
Re: PRINCE!Please keep posting..., 2/06/12, by hahaha.
Re: Posting..., 2/06/12, by hahaha.
Re: Obama's downfall? AW... Ever Heard of TAR SAND?, 2/06/12, by AW to Prince.
Re: Posting..., 2/06/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: Posting..., 2/06/12, by Hey, Nino, did you know this?.
Re: Posting..., 2/07/12, by But, .
Re: To AW... A Reply to Your Post., 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: To Anon5 and hahaha, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: To Prince, 2/07/12, by Becky.
Re: To Prince...To Becky, Thanks, nfm, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: Posting..., 2/07/12, by hahaha.
Re: To Anon5 and hahaha, 2/07/12, by hahaha.
Re: To prince, 2/07/12, by You did start out talking about AW's post.
Re: To the so-called anon, 2/07/12, by Becky.
Re: Hahaha...You PROVED My Point Again., 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: To prince...To Poster, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: Prince, your point was that you're not up to it, so yes., 2/07/12, by hahaha.
Re: To AW... A Reply to Your Post., 2/07/12, by AW to Prince -.
Re: To the so-called anon - Becky, 2/07/12, by You MIGHT notice.
Re: To Becky -- You are kidding, right?, 2/07/12, by AW.
Re: To the so-called anon - Becky, 2/07/12, by hahaha.
Re: To the so-called anon - Becky, 2/07/12, by Not true, but bitching about all the snipy stuff gets old.
Re: To AW... A Reply to Your Post., 2/07/12, by You do know, don't you, AW.
Re: To AW... A Reply to Your Post....??????, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: To Becky -- You are kidding, right?...To AW from Prince, 2/07/12, by prince.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/28/12, by Rep's Deficit Donations".
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/28/12, by hahaha.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/28/12, by anon10.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/28/12, by Actually, many conservatives complained.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/28/12, by Does the "3 trillion".
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/28/12, by Does the "3 trillion" include the two wars Bush got us into.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/29/12, by hahaha.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/29/12, by hahaha.
Re: "'Impressed and Delighted' Warren Buffet Matches GOP, 1/29/12, by To: Does the 3 Trillion.
Re: UH OH !, did I miss the date of Warren Buffett's teleth, 1/29/12, by Sally.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/28/12, by Totally lost here.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/28/12, by I did a search on "GM Paid back bail out money".
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/28/12, by You must mean Ed Whitacre.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/29/12, by Sally to Totally lost.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/30/12, by Question for Sally.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/31/12, by Sally ___ "Question for Sally.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/31/12, by Sally to "Question for Sally" Waggoner was CEO till Obama.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/31/12, by Becky.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/31/12, by Just as I thought. NO ANSWER FROM APOLOGISTS .
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/31/12, by Sally to Becky.
Re: Who is the L I A R? GM or CBS NEWS w/ Scott Pelley?, 1/31/12, by Sally, do you know that Abigail is now posting as anon? nfm.
Re: Manufacturing ecosystem!, 1/28/12, by THe author poses an artificial construct.
Re: Manufacturing ecosystem!, 1/28/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Manufacturing ecosystem!, 1/28/12, by WHAT austerity, tec??.
Re: MSM is attempting to sway,,hmmm, not so much, 1/27/12, by Becky.
Re: MSM is attempting to sway,,hmmm, not so much, 1/27/12, by This economic news.
Re: MSM is attempting to sway,,hmmm, not so much, 1/27/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/27/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: From the SOTU transcript, 1/27/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: From the SOTU transcript, 1/27/12, by Jo.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/27/12, by LOLOLOLOL.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/27/12, by Uh Oh! "U.S. economy grew in final three months of 2011" WSJ.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/27/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/27/12, by LOLOLOL again!!!!.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/27/12, by hahaha.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/28/12, by AW.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/28/12, by Sally to AW.
Re: For Repubs, latest sign of economic growth = bad news , 1/29/12, by There you are, UH OH ! you ARE still here. When's Warren.
Re: POTUS SOTU - The Ultimate Master Class, 1/26/12, by In Public Speaking.
Re: POTUS SOTU Address=8th grade reading level, 1/26/12, by Anon5.
Re: POTUS SOTU Address=8th grade reading level, 1/26/12, by Perhaps he had Arne Duncan do a Cloze screening.
Re: POTUS SOTU Address=8th grade reading level, 1/27/12, by Chan.
Re: POTUS SOTU:Ultimate Master Class in Public Speaking, 1/27/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by hahaha.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by so they were in favor of the proposals? Or was this a.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by seems like a higher percentage of democrats were polled.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by Becky.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by hahaha.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by Well, Becky.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by Tjere.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by There's a major difference between.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/25/12, by You're parsing words.
Re: CBS News Poll shows, 1/29/12, by Sally.
Re: And then they came for you, 1/25/12, by hahaha.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by Becky.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by Well, Becky, with which of the AP's "interpretation .
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by Becky.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by So, to you none of the points made by the AP were valid? .
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by Becky.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by So, do you think the Associated Press was.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by Regarding media "interpretations" .
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by Media interpretation???.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by hahaha.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by eastexsteve.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by AW - he mentioned.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by eastexsteve.
Re: The Associated Press View of the State of the Union addr, 1/25/12, by adding to Eastexsteve.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by western Canada, but in central Canada, in Alberta and .
Re: The Washington Times is a Moonie newspaper, 1/24/12, by founded by Sun Myung Moon. Reliable? hardly. nfm.
Re: The Washington Times is a Moonie newspaper, 1/24/12, by hahaha.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by because.
Re: You and the Moonie paper have no idea if Buffett would , 1/24/12, by benefit or not--there ARE other freight-carrying railways.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by Making invalid assumptions AGAIN. No one ever said.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by Speaking of invalid assumprtions . . ..
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by Link here to map of Burlington-Northern.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by And, " According to TransCanada's own data, just.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by Because, as I said, Obama's decision was only political.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: First of all, the dirty tar sands oil is not produced in, 1/24/12, by "They" is TransCanada nfm.
Re: The End of America, 1/23/12, by AM.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/23/12, by So what is the difference now between us and China?.
Re: The End of America, 1/23/12, by AM.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by florida teacher.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by Well, gee, and it would seem both sides of the political.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by We already have programs to weatherize buildings.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by Chan.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by Gas prices are down here. nfm.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by Chan.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by Gas prices are down? Down from what?.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by hahaha.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by Gas prices are down from what? .
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by Chan.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by hahaha.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by July ,2008: ave. gas price in TX: $3.97 a gallon. nfm.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by Nobody said local gas prices are cheaper than $1.85 a gallon.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by It is so typical of you to avoid .
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by AM .
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by AM to chan.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/24/12, by AM.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by Ya know, people do have lives other than to answer.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by But you have plenty of time to ask your own.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: There are bigger problems - here's the chart, 1/24/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/24/12, by Of course we do our own shopping. nfm.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/25/12, by hahaha.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/25/12, by the reality of gas prices.
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/25/12, by Looking at the chart .
Re: There are bigger problems than this already in play, 1/25/12, by AM to ya know.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by Chan.
Re: There are bigger problems - here's the chart, 1/26/12, by Chan.
Re: There are bigger problems - here's the chart, 1/26/12, by Chan.
Re: There are bigger problems - here's the chart, 1/26/12, by Chan.
Re: There are bigger problems - here's the chart, 1/26/12, by Chan.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by What does serving in the military have to do with anything? .
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by Nino/Can.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by AW - considering that obama is wanting to cut.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by hahaha.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/26/12, by You didn't serve in the Canadian military either.
Re: to AW, here's what Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1/26/12, by Republican president, 1953-1961 had to say.
Re: to AW, here's what Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1/26/12, by And isn't it ironic that DDE's major achievement.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/27/12, by Chan.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/27/12, by Chan.
Re: Chan, 1/27/12, by Anon5.
Re: Chan, 1/27/12, by Chan.
Re: While we were sleeping Dec 31-The End of America, 1/27/12, by hahaha.
Re: to AW, here's what Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1/28/12, by AW --- somehow, I bet that doesn't give the whole meaning.
Re: to AW, here's what Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1/28/12, by A couple of sources for AW .
Re: to AW, here's what Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1/28/12, by Thanks for the sources, and.
Re: About primaries -- particularly in Iowa and NH, 1/24/12, by Guess Abigail isn't around. So know one else knows?.
Re: About primaries -- particularly in Iowa and NH, 1/24/12, by answers.
Re: I found this ironic, 1/21/12, by Probably, you are unaware of how caucuses.
Re: I found this ironic, 1/21/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: I found this ironic, 1/21/12, by They may be cast on hand written ballots but .
Re: I found this ironic, 1/22/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: I found this ironic, 1/22/12, by It only appears so because .
Re: I found this ironic, 1/22/12, by Too, you think it is ironic because.
Re: Catholic leadrs to Newt, Rick: Stop ugly racial stereoty, 1/21/12, by Uh Oh! with the link to above news HERE.
Re: Catholic leadrs to Newt, Rick: Stop ugly racial stereoty, 1/21/12, by AW -- and just who are these 45 so-called leaders?.
Re: Catholic leaders to Newt, Rick stop ugly racial stereoty, 1/21/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by hahaha.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by No, we need more people less willing for the government.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by hahaha.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by Jo.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by hahaha.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by The REAL safety net.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/20/12, by liberty rocks.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by Maggie.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by a truly Christian person.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by Maggie.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by I am too. Maggie.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by Maggie.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by AW to TEC.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by AW -- is that right?.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by I do love certainty. But, I think Jesus would .
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by hahaha.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/21/12, by hahaha.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/21/12, by Democrats have.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/21/12, by To Maggie.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Maggie.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by To Maggie.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Becky .
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by To: Becky.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/22/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/22/12, by You stand by with a warm coat and gloves.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Maggie.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Oh, dear Lord.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by weasily attempt at justification, tec..
Re: Good post, TEC & you, wife displayed charity & kindness, 1/22/12, by Uh Oh! Interesting, too, that Reagan lie .
Re: Good post, TEC & you, wife displayed charity & kindness, 1/22/12, by LOLOL, tec's WIFE did show charity and .
Re: Good post, TEC & you, wife displayed charity & respect, 1/22/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by hahaha.
Re: Good post, TEC & you, wife displayed charity & respect, 1/22/12, by Your interpretation, .
Re: A purity anecdotal experience!, 1/22/12, by hahaha.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by AW -- everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by hahaha.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by hahaha.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Maggie.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by being a nun gives you a great inside track than priests.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by being a nun gives you a great inside track than priests.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by being a nun gives you a great inside track than priests.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by AW -- the key word is "was".
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Maggie.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/22/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Maybe Maggie is trying to say, 1/23/12, by hahaha.
Re: The same result!, 1/20/12, by hahaha.
Re: Speaker Boehner has hundred of thousands of dollars of, 1/19/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Speaker Boehner has hundred of thousands of dollars of, 1/20/12, by Hmm. I'ver read that John Kerry is the top investor in.
Re: Speaker Boehner has hundred of thousands of dollars of, 1/20/12, by Becky .
Re: Speaker Boehner has hundred of thousands of dollars of, 1/20/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: The New York Times supports, 1/19/12, by President Obama's decision on KeystoneXL.
Re: The New York Times supports, 1/19/12, by hahaha.
Re: The New York Times supports Obama's decision on Keystone, 1/19/12, by Is hahaha saying that the WA Post editorial board is .
Re: The New York Times supports Obama's decision on Keystone, 1/19/12, by hahaha.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich, 1/19/12, by Anon5.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich. I don't understand, 1/19/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich. I don't understand, 1/19/12, by Neither will run as a third party candidate.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich. I don't understand, 1/19/12, by Chan.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich. Its not rocket science, 1/19/12, by hahaha.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich. I don't understand, 1/21/12, by you don't understand?.
Re: Perry Drops Out, Endorses Gingrich. Its not rocket scie, 1/22/12, by Not at all. GOP will run either George Hamilton or Porky Pig.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by Uh oh's braying on nonexistent issues continues.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme,fraudulent", 1/17/12, by Uh Oh! "More than 10% .
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme,fraudulent", 1/17/12, by LOLOL.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws"clever scheme, fraudulent", 1/17/12, by Uh Oh! 5 million+ Americans could be denied rght to vote.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws"clever scheme, fraudulent", 1/17/12, by There are probably 3 milllion from NY state. LOLOL..
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws"clever scheme, fraudulent", 1/17/12, by Tired of your impersonation of.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws"clever scheme, fraudulent", 1/17/12, by to Uh Oh....Nino/Can.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by Becky .
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by Don't know how you missed the voter intimidation.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by oh, too scary!.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by There is no evidence.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by Typical of you "anon" to cut off the entire first part of .
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/17/12, by Several examples of Republican voter suppression.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/18/12, by I take the same liberties as uh oh.
Re: There is no one better than the Democratic Party, 1/18/12, by at voter suppression.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/18/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme, fraudulent, 1/18/12, by Sorry, ETS. You're right. It wasn't your post. nfm.
Re: Repubs voter suppression laws "clever scheme,fraudulent", 1/19/12, by Granny.
Re: Indiana Republican Charlie White, Secretary of State, 1/17/12, by Indiana.
Re: If a Republican wins in 2012 , 1/16/12, by it's because Obama has done such a poor job.
Re: RealClearPolitics: Repub voter laws "attack on right to , 1/17/12, by We hear these things, but . . . questions.
Re: RealClearPolitics: Repub voter laws "attack on right to , 1/17/12, by Chan.
Re: Ironic, 1/17/12, by LOLOL, uh oh complains about voter "suppression".
Re: Making it more difficult to vote (YouTube video), 1/17/12, by Chan.
Re: The OTHER Repub attempt at disenfranchisement , 1/16/12, by More stupid crap.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by I don't getting either..... Nm.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Uh Oh! - favored by Repubs to suppress vote by poor, elderly.
Re: Real intent:suppress vote by poor,elderly,students, 1/16/12, by Uh Oh! .
Re: Real intent:suppress vote by poor,elderly,students, 1/16/12, by Indiana, again.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Load of crap.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Forgot to add.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Read the Wikipedia article that UhOh! attached. (more).
Re: Thank you for the link, proves my point, 1/16/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Indiana, again.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: What's the big deal about having to have a photo ID to v, 1/16/12, by Early voting period shortened in:.
Re: Repubs trying to eliminate, shorten early voting opps, 1/16/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Thank you for the link, proves my point, 1/16/12, by Naturally, you would take an excerpt.
Re: Repubs trying to eliminate, shorten early voting opps, 1/17/12, by Well, heck, don't ya know.
Re: Repubs trying to eliminate, shorten early voting opps, 1/17/12, by Chan.
Re: Repubs trying to eliminate, shorten early voting opps, 1/17/12, by Indiana.
Re: Repubs trying to eliminate, shorten early voting opps, 1/17/12, by Uh Oh! - target blocks of voters they believe will vote Dem.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/16/12, by Land of opportunity?.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/16/12, by Or, if you are successful, the government .
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity? Yeah, it is., 1/16/12, by hahaha.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity? Yeah, it is., 1/16/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity? Yeah, it is., 1/16/12, by hahaha.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity? Yeah, it is., 1/16/12, by Oh I get it now.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/17/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/17/12, by Chan.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/17/12, by hahaha.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/17/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Is TEC really the biggest spreader of horse manure?, 1/18/12, by hahaha.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/18/12, by Chan.
Re: Is America really the land of opportunity?, 1/18/12, by hahaha.
Re: Democratic Group Wants to Stop Ron Paul, 1/13/12, by Won't be necessary.
Re: Tec, have you seen the news about Austria?, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Tec, have you seen the news about Austria?, 1/14/12, by hahaha.
Re: Tec, have you seen the news about Austria?, 1/14/12, by But, but, but, tec.
Re: But Tec! Part I, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: But Tec! Part II, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: But Tec! Part II, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Well, that explained nothing, 1/14/12, by You dodged the issue.
Re: A little more!, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/14/12, by Austria IS part of the Common Market.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/14/12, by Well, obviously.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/14/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/14/12, by If that was your point.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/15/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/15/12, by Baloney.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/15/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/15/12, by Now you take the time to deflect.
Re: Austria is NOT on the periphery of the Eurozone, 1/15/12, by hahaha.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by I would applaud it.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Chan.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Did you know.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Privatization does not result in .
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Who's your source, anon?.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Chan.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Thank you, Chan, for your voice of reason on this topic. nm.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by Sources.
Re: Thank you for posting this very important info, 1/13/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/13/12, by I got "page not found" on your.
Re: Thank you for posting this very important info, 1/13/12, by How does privatization "grow" government? .
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/14/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: So, uh oh, what did you conclude about privatization?, 1/14/12, by hahaha.
Re: Obama seeks Reagan-era power to merge agencies, 1/14/12, by Let me see if I have this right, anon and uh oh. .
Re: So, uh oh, what did you conclude about privatization?, 1/14/12, by "Bush more than doubled the amount that the federal .
Re: So, uh oh, what did you conclude about privatization?, 1/14/12, by Our armed forces do not focus on the things .
Re: So, uh oh, what did you conclude about privatization?, 1/14/12, by haaha.
Re: ron paul's desire to cut the dept. of education, 1/13/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: ron paul's desire to cut the dept. of education, 1/13/12, by Chan.
Re: ron paul's desire to cut the dept. of education, 1/13/12, by The Department of Education.
Re: ron paul's desire to cut the dept. of education, 1/13/12, by Early Birdy says Go Ron!.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by This was stupid. You're making things up again..
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by Chan.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by hahaha.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by Surely no one is promoting legislating morality....
Re: Victory Capitalism!, 1/12/12, by hahaha.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by And you're NOT!!!!! You're full of it Mr. Heehaw.
Re: Rick Perry accuses Romney of Vulture Capitalism, 1/12/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by Not even clodse, tec.
Re: Rick Perry accuses Romney of Vulture Capitalism, 1/12/12, by How are those loopholes any different than .
Re: Rick Perry accuses Romney of Vulture Capitalism, 1/12/12, by Becky .
Re: Vulture Capitalism?!, 1/12/12, by Turn it toward the legislators. nm.
Re: Rick Perry accuses Romney of Vulture Capitalism, 1/12/12, by If money buys votes.
Re: Victory?! feel free to come up with a fact or two, 1/12/12, by hahaha.
Re: Vulture Capitalism?! Tec's got nothing but anger, 1/12/12, by hahaha.
Re: Rick Perry accuses Romney of Vulture Capitalism, 1/12/12, by hahaha.
Re: Rick Perry accuses Romney of Vulture Capitalism, 1/12/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Not even close -Evangelical republicans leery of Mormons, 1/10/12, by GOP speaker said that Mormonism is a "cult".
Re: Not even close -Evangelical republicans leery of Mormons, 1/10/12, by hahaha.
Re: Not even close -What a clever way to, 1/10/12, by highlight the religion "issue".
Re: Not even close -What a clever way to, 1/10/12, by Uh Oh! here we go is right! LOL.
Re: white evangelical repubs bothered by Romney's religion, 1/10/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: Let's keep ALL religion talk out of politics. nfm, 1/10/12, by Anon5.
Re: Not even close -What a clever way to, 1/10/12, by No, I brought up the expectations of slurs.
Re: Not even close -Evangelical republicans leery of Mormons, 1/10/12, by The assumption is also that evangelical .
Re: Not even close -Evangelical republicans leery of Mormons, 1/10/12, by Uh Oh!.
Re: white evangelical repubs bothered by Romney's religion, 1/10/12, by hahaha.
Re: white evangelical repubs bothered by Romney's religion, 1/10/12, by Yep, she is .
Re: Not even close, 1/10/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Not even close -Evangelical republicans leery of Mormons, 1/11/12, by Chan.
Re: white evangelical repubs bothered by Romney's religion, 1/11/12, by Chan.
Re: Not even close, 1/11/12, by Chan.
Re: white evangelical repubs bothered by Romney's religion, 1/11/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Chan: "....media has already decreed..Romney..nominee...", 1/13/12, by Anon5.
Re: Chan: "....media has already decreed..Romney..nominee..., 1/13/12, by Chan.
Re: Chan: "....media has already decreed..Romney..nominee..., 1/13/12, by I disagree.
Re: Chan: "....media has already decreed..Romney..nominee..., 1/13/12, by Chan.
Re: Chan: "....media has already decreed..Romney..nominee..., 1/13/12, by Anon5.
Re: Chan: "....media has already decreed..Romney..nominee..., 1/13/12, by That's their opinion.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/10/12, by hahaha.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by Chan.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by Chan.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by This is just silly..
Re: Toys�R�Us, the TEC dodge: He doesn't know anything, 1/11/12, by hahaha.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: , tec dodges and weaves to avoid admitting he's clueless, 1/11/12, by hahaha.
Re: Toys-R-Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by Chan.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by Then, why in the hell didn't .
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by Jo.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by To: Jo.
Re: Toys�R�Us, not the store, but the tax dodge!, 1/11/12, by I just wonder what all the diamond/question marks are...nm.
Re: Penalized for something that doesn't exist, 1/10/12, by The Act was signed in 2007 by Bush. nfm.
Re: Penalized for something that doesn't exist, 1/10/12, by The act may have been signed in 2007- the .
Re: Why the media SEEMINGLY ignores Ron Paul, 1/09/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Why the media SEEMINGLY ignores Ron Paul, 1/10/12, by Chan.
Re: Ron who? nfm, 1/10/12, by Anon5.
Re: Ron who? nfm, 1/10/12, by I HOPE this was supposed to be a joke.
Re: Ron who? nfm, 1/10/12, by Chan.
Re: Of course it was a joke.........., 1/10/12, by Anon5.
Re: High court backs foreign campaign contribution ban, 1/10/12, by Chan.
Re: McCain accidently praises Obama, 1/06/12, by LOL, I think it is what he knows in his heart. nfm.
Re: McCain accidently praises Obama, 1/07/12, by Bill T 6 nc.
Re: McCain accidently praises Obama, 1/07/12, by jmho5.
Re: McCain accidently praises Obama, 1/07/12, by The Obamas paid for their vacation rental, just FYI. nfm.
Re: McCain accidently praises Obama, 1/08/12, by wow..
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/07/12, by AM.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/07/12, by Thanks, AM. Now the reader can click on your link and.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/07/12, by II thought it was important for people to read too-am-nfm,.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/07/12, by I want more verification than the.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/07/12, by While wondering why the poster isn't doing his/her own.
Re: That route has been changed, 1/08/12, by so, one wonders.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by AM to want more verification.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Thank you, AM. I doubt that the questioner has even .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Oh, but I did.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Please state specifically where the Keystone XL.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by AW -- Isn't this a slap in the face of Canada?.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by This has been gone over and over.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by First of all, AW, President Obama.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Ah, still no sources cited, no definite new "safe" route .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Good Lord!!.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by The new route is to be determined in .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Becky .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by The Cornell study was published Sept., 2011--hardly old news.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Good grief, Good Lord!!.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Good grief, Good Lord!! (this one).
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by The duration of the construction will be over.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by HUH?????.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Ya' know, Becky.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Availability and sale to foreign countries means less.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Yet another attempt at diversion. nfm.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by Becky .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/08/12, by KXL Jobs are Temporary ansd Non-Local.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline Not Safe, 1/09/12, by And other jobs provided by stimulus were permanent? nm.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by for sure.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by Becky .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by Doesn't matter.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by Becky .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by Speaking of games . . ..
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by What makes you think TransCanada won't be sellinig the .
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by Why do I think that?.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Keystone XL Pipeline WILL be built, 1/09/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Five regions key to the economy, 1/08/12, by The article was in Forbes, a conservative magazine. nfm.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs New Jobs Created, 1/07/12, by That is just the "new" obama mathematics at work!.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs New Jobs Created, 1/07/12, by Because.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs New Jobs Created, 1/07/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs New Jobs Created, 1/07/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: European austerity has only been practiced for, 1/07/12, by the past 18 months,..
Re: European austerity has only been practiced for, 1/07/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: European austerity has only been practiced for, 1/07/12, by Some interesting word choices.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/07/12, by were cited.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs New Jobs Created, 1/08/12, by AW.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/08/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs To: AW, 1/08/12, by The statistics.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs To: AW, 1/08/12, by So then it is hogwash.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/08/12, by hahaha.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/08/12, by one would THINK.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs To: AW, 1/08/12, by not worthless for.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs To: AW, 1/08/12, by Correction - .
Re: New Jobless Claims vs To: AW, 1/08/12, by The employment-population ratio.
Re: New Jobless Claims vs To: AW, 1/08/12, by Not when you look at the graph.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/09/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/09/12, by three years is more than a heartbeat.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/09/12, by And Senate republicans used the filibuster on.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/09/12, by which specific bills would have helped the economy?.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/09/12, by hahaha.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/10/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/10/12, by These studies.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/10/12, by hahaha.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by You have it wrong.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by Make up your mind.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by Becky .
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by In my opinion.
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/11/12, by Steve, it's not even a jobs program any more..
Re: Also interesting that Sweden and Austria , 1/12/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: So, Becky, 1/12/12, by What are YOUR thoughts.
Re: So, "anon", 1/12/12, by Becky .
Re: So, "anon", 1/12/12, by Well, I forgot one reason.
Re: So, "anon", 1/12/12, by hahaha.
Re: So, "anon", 1/12/12, by Tracking doesn't preclude an education.
Re: So, "anon", 1/12/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Is this board broke?, 1/07/12, by Jo.
Re: Is this board broke?, 1/07/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by Anon5.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by LOL.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by Chan.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by AA.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by Chan.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by Anon5.
Re: The GOP race, 1/04/12, by AA.
Re: Mitt Romney and "America the Beautiful", 1/04/12, by AA.
Re: Mitt Romney and "America the Beautiful", 1/04/12, by T.E.C. - Iowa.
Re: Mitt Romney and "America the Beautiful". Thanks, TEC!, 1/04/12, by Uh Oh! Great irony, TEC, thank you for sharing it!.
Re: Mitt Romney and "America the Beautiful", 1/04/12, by I did..
Re: Mitt Romney and "America the Beautiful", 1/04/12, by hahaha.
Re: Mitt Romney and "America the Beautiful", 1/04/12, by AA.
Re: Interesting interview with Cantor on "60 Minutes" last n, 1/02/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Interesting interview with Cantor on "60 Minutes" last n, 1/03/12, by Fox News with Neil Cavuto said.
Re: Interesting interview with Cantor on "60 Minutes" last n, 1/03/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Interesting interview with Cantor: To Anon, 1/03/12, by AA.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Cantor, 1/03/12, by Anon5.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by AA.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by Chalkmaven.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by To: Chalkmaven.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by As you frequently tell other posters, AA, google is your .
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by Thanks, I have already tried that.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by Tried 3X to give you some examples, only to have the.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by Some sources--more available if you look..
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/03/12, by This is the one that got sent to the admin., so trying it.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/04/12, by AA.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/04/12, by Doesn't matter, AA, since Reagan signed each bill. nfm.
Re: Here is the video of the 60 minutes interview with Canto, 1/04/12, by LOLOLOL!!!!!.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by Correction on the link: make it 2012, not 2010. nfm.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by Santorum thinks the states should have the right to.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by No, ETS, it's the INDIVIDUAL'S right to decide whether to.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by To 'no'.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by Apparently, then, ETS, if Texas decided to outlaw all forms.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by The question of the right to birth control has already.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by EasTexSteve.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by This is kinda of funny anon.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/03/12, by Here's how it happened--a court clerk connected with.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/04/12, by AA.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/04/12, by Chan.
Re: Here's one of many reasons not to vote for Santorum, 1/04/12, by AA.
Chat Center
64
Teacher's Desk
Chatboards
Lesson Plans
Projects
Jobs
For Sale
Articles
Mailrings
Live Chat
Live Meetings
Printables
Harry Wong