Politics Chatboard
Welcome to the Teachers.net Politics Chatboard, a forum dedicated to discussion of politics everywhere. Discussions appropriate to this forum include all issues related to politics and legislation. Please be considerate of the diverse viewpoints of your colleagues, and note that while this forum will not be moderated for content, postings that are not respectful in nature may be subject to removal in order to maintain a collegial and supportive environment. Be sure to tell your colleagues about all of the free teacher resources on Teachers.Net!
Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plans , 11/08/09, by I do not understand why.. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by sent to soon -- had one more question/comment. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by To Franklin - - - . Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by No one would limit how much you can set aside, just. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by BINGO -- goes to FrankliN! nm. Re: Under the house plan, the gov will control flex pay plan , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Especially for Maggie , 11/08/09, by aggie'swife. 220 to 215 , 11/07/09, by nm. Re: 220 to 215 , 11/07/09, by One Republican broke ranks and voted "Yes". Re: 220 to 215 , 11/07/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: 220 to 215 , 11/07/09, by Nino/Can. Re: 220 to 215 , 11/07/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: 220 to 215 , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: 220 to 215 , 11/08/09, by I've been reading (again) through the text of the bill. For those of you knocking Boehner for his gaffe , 11/07/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: For those of you knocking Boehner for his gaffe , 11/07/09, by Christ, which one?. Re: For those of you knocking Boehner for his gaffe , 11/07/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: For those of you knocking Boehner for his gaffe , 11/07/09, by Nope, I'm very proud of our President. I just heard three different democrats state that , 11/07/09, by when Soc Sec Act was passed, it was passed by. Re: I just heard three -- -- with a correction: , 11/07/09, by see inside . Need a politically correct Bible - look here! , 11/07/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Need a politically correct Bible - look here! , 11/07/09, by "The conservative movement" ???. Re: Need a politically correct Bible - look here! , 11/07/09, by Thanks, T.E.C, very "interesting"!. Re: Need a politically correct Bible - look here! , 11/07/09, by these people make me sick. Re: Need a politically correct Bible - look here! , 11/07/09, by hahaha. Let freedom ring , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Let freedom ring - let the truth be known! , 11/06/09, by Your single guy making $30,000 example . Re: Let freedom ring - let the truth be known! , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/06/09, by So, realistically, how many insurance arrests do you expect?. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Franklin. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Not to mention - - - . Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Franklin, with another reminder. Re: Let freedom ring , 11/07/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Let freedom ring , 11/07/09, by Franklin. Re: Let freedom ring , 11/07/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Let freedom ring , 11/07/09, by hahaha. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Actually, I've responded to all of these. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Franklin. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Cry me a river. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Businesses just might realize that it's a heck of a lot. Re: If business owners don't like it , 11/07/09, by Franklin. Re: Very few people wind up in jail for back taxes , 11/07/09, by Franklin. Re: This isn't complicated, To: Anon , 11/07/09, by Franklin. 10.2% unemployment , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: 10.2% unemployment , 11/08/09, by aggie'swife. support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by ga. Re: support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by This is very strange. Re: support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by ga. Re: support HR 2597 , 11/07/09, by You want the FEDS to mandate this?. Call congress to support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by ga. Re: Call congress to support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by Are you kidding?. Re: Call congress to support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by ga. Re: Call congress to support HR 2597 , 11/06/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. nazi signs; racist chants; ignorance of boehner; , 11/06/09, by Maggie. Re: nazi signs; racist chants; ignorance of boehner; , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: nazi signs; racist chants; ignorance of boehner; , 11/06/09, by Deb ms/IA. Re: nazi signs; racist chants; ignorance of boehner; , 11/06/09, by Maggie. Re: TO DEB.. tea baggers , 11/07/09, by Is what tea party folks often call themselves! nfm. Re: Regarding "teabaggers" , 11/07/09, by The only times I have heard/read this term. irony at Ft Hood , 11/06/09, by Maggie. Re: irony at Ft Hood. Soldiers don't pack heat on base? , 11/06/09, by But gun enthusiastics think teachers should carry??? nfm. Re: irony at Ft Hood , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: irony at Ft Hood- correction , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: irony at Ft Hood , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: irony at Ft Hood- correction , 11/06/09, by She was a civilian police officer nfm. Re: irony at Ft Hood , 11/06/09, by Soldier against soldier. Re: irony at Ft Hood- correction , 11/06/09, by Maggie, do you really think that these men and women. Re: irony at Ft Hood- correction , 11/06/09, by To Maggie -- do you really believe that? nm. Re: irony at Ft Hood , 11/06/09, by jmho. Re: irony at Ft Hood , 11/08/09, by aggie'swife. Have a sense of humor? , 11/06/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Have a sense of humor? , 11/06/09, by Maggie. Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by A question for Steve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Maggie. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by So Steve, "duck" means dangerous, radical Muslim?. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Here's another version. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. SOURCES??? , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. SOURCES??? , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. SOURCES??? , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. SOURCES??? , 11/06/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. SOURCES??? , 11/06/09, by Disagree. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. SOURCES??? , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Another disagreement. Re: A excellent piece about Ft Hood , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Please don't. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: But what if it walks like a soldier , 11/06/09, by and talks like a psychiatrist?. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Still not justification. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/06/09, by Franklin. Re: Ah, come on, Steve , 11/06/09, by a different story, different thoughts about the killer. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by Franklin. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by Can2. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by and when. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by I just heard on the news - - - (HLN). Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by Maggie. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/07/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/08/09, by hahaha. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/08/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Another muslim attack inside our borders. , 11/08/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: I am kind of surprised that Maggie isn't , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: I am kind of surprised that Maggie isn't , 11/08/09, by You're right -- Obama's watch. and he IS. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Warning . Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by and was that memo ever made public with evidence. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Okay then. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by This called for Steve!. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by To Franklin -- wow -- that person must think Steve is. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Steve knows. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by What's in a name. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Not me, never said that. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by Franklin. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: well that would be the case IF , 11/08/09, by hahaha. Re: so, Steve, why haven't you responded to the post , 11/08/09, by below?. Re: so, Steve, why haven't you responded to the post , 11/08/09, by Franklin. AARP endorses House health-care bill-to strengthen Medicare, , 11/05/09, by AARP says, "It meets our priorities for protecting Medicare, providing more affordable health insurance for 50- to 64-year-olds and reforming our health care system". So, let's get this straight , 11/05/09, by just checking. Re: So, let's get this straight , 11/05/09, by not quite.. in my view. NJ and VA Finally....the people have spoken!! , 11/04/09, by Guest. Re: NJ and VA Finally....the people have spoken!! , 11/04/09, by Really?. Re: Then somebody had better inform Orrin Hatch.. , 11/04/09, by ...because he seems to think the Grand Old sky is falling... I used to think Al Gore , 11/03/09, by was just not very smart. Re: I used to think Al Gore , 11/03/09, by AM. Re: I used to think Al Gore- his father was a tobacco farmer , 11/04/09, by until Al's sister died of lung cancer from smoking. Re: I used to think Al Gore , 11/04/09, by shrewd is a good word. Re: I used to think Al Gore-Then we will be sorry we , 11/04/09, by AM. Re: Choose to build, not destroy , 11/04/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Choose to build, not destroy , 11/04/09, by hahaha. Re: Carter? , 11/04/09, by What I remember about him..... Re: build, not destroy - TEC, thanks I didn't know that , 11/04/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Carter and nuclear power! , 11/04/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: build, not destroy - TEC, thanks I didn't know that , 11/05/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Carter and nuclear power! , 11/05/09, by hahaha. Re: Carter and nuclear power! , 11/05/09, by EasTexSteve. NY voters reject the Limbaugh- Armey- Palin-conservative , 11/04/09, by Instead, the district elected the first Democrat in 100 years . Re: NY voters reject the Limbaugh- Armey- Palin-conservative , 11/04/09, by Marilyn. Re: NY voters reject the Limbaugh- Armey- Palin-conservative , 11/04/09, by The conservative didn't live in the district and had . Re: NY voters reject the Limbaugh- Armey- Palin-conservative , 11/04/09, by Kind of like Hillary?. Re: Neither Limbaugh, Armey or Palin ran- I don't THINK so , 11/04/09, by hahaha. Re: The conservative guy didn't live in the district? , 11/04/09, by I didn't know that. Re: The conservative guy didn't live in the district? , 11/04/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: NY voters reject the Limbaugh- Armey- Palin-conservative , 11/05/09, by that's like saying the N.J. voters rejected Obama. Re: NY voters reject the Limbaugh- Armey- Palin-conservative , 11/05/09, by Franklin. Virginia, New Jersey won by , 11/04/09, by Franklin. How many years? , 11/04/09, by Marilyn. Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by the Repub's to quit blaming Clinton, of course that hasn't . Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by Marilyn. Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by Goes around. Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by Marilyn. Re: How many years? Until justice is served! , 11/04/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by Anticipation!. Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by Marilyn. Re: How many years? Maybe the same number of years it took , 11/04/09, by too early to dream of success? Too early to call failure. Re: How many years? Until justice is served! , 11/04/09, by hahaha. Another missed deadline? , 11/03/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Another missed deadline? , 11/03/09, by I'm in no hurry, and I'm glad they're not either. Re: Another missed deadline? , 11/04/09, by Taking time to "get it right"? Nope -- simple reasons:. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by They seem to be still hammering out the details. nfm. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by They don't seem incredibly panicky over it. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by So you don't recall the insistence that it HAD to be pushed. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: What would be the point of trying to rush it through? , 11/04/09, by I haven't read that the plan's "start date" has changed. Re: I don't think the president shares your nonchalance , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by I must have missed something. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by But nothing more recent than May or July?. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by If you're all that unhappy about the bill. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Neither one of you seems very happy, to be honest. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Well, that's something. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by OK, but I was FAR more chalant in May and August. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/04/09, by What I'm still really not understanding. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/05/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/05/09, by Republicans are blocking passage nfm. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/05/09, by ???. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/05/09, by Franklin. Re: So...he set some deadline this week, last week, or...? , 11/05/09, by Glad to know nobody's getting pissy. Carry on. nfm. Healthe Care Reform , 11/03/09, by Marilyn. Re: Healthe Care Reform , 11/03/09, by Marilyn. Re: Healthe Care Reform , 11/03/09, by heart medicine. So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/02/09, by (and did she used to post on this board?). Re: So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/03/09, by Maggie. Re: So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/03/09, by She's doing more inciting. Re: So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/03/09, by Maybe she is telling the truth?!?!?!. Re: So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/03/09, by I cannot believe you're defending her. Re: So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/03/09, by WHAT???. Re: So what the hell was Virginia Foxx thinking? , 11/03/09, by Yes, I do get it. Anhone with info about window plastic applied by hair dryer , 11/02/09, by To keep the cold out during winter?. Re: Anhone with info about window plastic applied by hair dr , 11/02/09, by Keep googling to find more info. Re: Anyone with info about window - OOPS wrong board!!! , 11/02/09, by Sorry, I got lost. Thank you for the link! (nfm). 60 Minutes on HiN1 Vaccine production , 11/01/09, by chalkmaven. A Heroes Return by Oliver North , 11/01/09, by aggie'swife. Re: aw, did you forget that Obama already sent in 21,000 , 11/01/09, by additional troops in March? Did you know that a request for. Re: aw, did you forget that Obama already sent in 21,000 , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: aw, did you forget that Obama already sent in 21,000 , 11/01/09, by aggie'swife -- why did you respond on the defensive?. Re: Oliver North , 11/01/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Oliver North , 11/01/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North , 11/02/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Oliver North , 11/02/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Oliver North , 11/02/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North , 11/02/09, by same old thing. Re: Oliver North & Reagan dealt arms to Iran, cocaine to US, , 11/02/09, by Oliver North isn't in jail because: immunity,cover up,Reagan. Re: Oliver North & Reagan dealt arms to Iran, cocaine to US, , 11/02/09, by Thank you for the truth! nfm. Re: Oliver North , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North & Reagan dealt arms to Iran, cocaine to US, , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: Defending Oliver North! , 11/03/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Oliver North , 11/03/09, by same old thing. Re: Defending Oliver North! , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North , 11/03/09, by Lev is spinning like a top. Re: Defending Oliver North! , 11/03/09, by and now defending felons like Libby. Re: Defending Oliver North! , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: Defending Oliver North! , 11/05/09, by and still more of the same. Re: Oliver North , 11/05/09, by more of the same. Re: Defending Oliver North! , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Re: Oliver North , 11/06/09, by hahaha. Lest We Forget , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: Lest We Forget , 11/01/09, by Thank you, Franklin, for posting this. nm. A trillion dollar health care "reform" , 10/31/09, by Franklin. Re: A trillion dollar health care "reform" , 10/31/09, by Sally. An interesting picture! , 10/31/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: An interesting picture! , 10/31/09, by hahaha. Re: An interesting picture! , 10/31/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: An interesting picture! , 10/31/09, by Sally. Being a Democrat in Congress is like being the Principal's , 10/30/09, by wife and getting passes and being "More Equal" than her peers.. Re: None of you taught with your principal's wife? , 10/31/09, by Sally. Re: None of you taught with your principal's wife? , 10/31/09, by No. This situation would violate our district policy. nfm. Re: To: No , 10/31/09, by Sally. Re: To: No , 11/01/09, by Even if they were both totally professional. Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by who called the lobbyist a whore? nm. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Sally. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Or, maybe the lobbyist is a whore. nfm. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: To: Maybe the lobbyist is a whore. , 10/30/09, by Sally, who can understand the "anon" and "nfm" on your post. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Ah, but the dems got up in arms when Imus called. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Those were nice college girls. Re: To: Maybe the lobbyist is a whore. , 10/30/09, by Wasn't aware she was even a woman until 2 minutes ago. Re: You can trade yourself for more than money!! , 10/30/09, by chocolate comes to mind. nfm. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Sally, remembers the outrage about this. I thought. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Or, I could go watch my movie and. Re: The Imus remark was despicable, BUT he was not a , 10/30/09, by member of the U. S. Senate.----Sally. Re: The Imus remark was despicable, BUT he was not a , 10/30/09, by He's not getting a pass. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by So it was okay with you for a US Senator to openly. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: To: He's not getting a pass , 10/30/09, by Sally. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by He's not a senator. nfm. Re: To: He's not getting a pass , 10/30/09, by "She's not worth it?" . Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by senator, representative -- no matter -- he's an elected. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/30/09, by Commonly applied to K-Street workers. Re: To : He's not a senator , 10/30/09, by Sally. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/30/09, by If it's common and acceptable then why. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/30/09, by Well, you tell us. Re: To: He's not getting a pass , 10/30/09, by OP asked why I'm not up in arms about it. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/30/09, by I've never thought it was acceptable.. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Fine by me!. Re: To: Fine by me! , 10/30/09, by Sally, who thinks you must be a lobbyist, too, since you. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: To: Fine by me! , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: To: Fine by me! , 10/30/09, by LOL...no, not a lobbyist. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/30/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 10/31/09, by Maggie. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/31/09, by Maggie. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/31/09, by Maggie. Re: Are we at war? , 10/31/09, by Franklin. Re: it's really quite common a phrase , 10/31/09, by hahaha. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by jmho. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by No, and don't hold your breath. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by The president DID lie. What evidence this woman's a whore?. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by Or.... Re: Why didn't the repubs get up in arms about Vitter, who , 11/01/09, by loves to wear diapers with prostitutes? nfm. Re: Why didn't the repubs get up in arms about Vitter, who , 11/01/09, by Not a Republican, but I've got to ask. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by broken promises = lies. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by But that's still between Mr. Vitter and Mrs. Vitter. Re: Of course he lied , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: Why didn't the repubs get up in arms about Vitter, who , 11/01/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Why didn't dems get up in arms about the senator , 11/01/09, by Maggie. Re: Of course he lied , 11/01/09, by Maggie. Re: Of course he lied , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: Speaking of "interpretation", Maggie , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: The difference between Wilson and Grayson , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same and forever , 11/01/09, by You need some new lines, Franklin. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same and forever , 11/01/09, by aggie'swife. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same and forever , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same: To AW , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same and forever , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same and forever , 11/01/09, by Of course we could still be fighting!. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean the same and forever , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: "necessary" doesn't mean. To: AW , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: Of course he lied , 11/01/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Why didn't repubs get up in arms about senator , 11/01/09, by Ensign, who not only betrayed his wife, but ignored the law. Re: Of course he lied , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: You loyal republicans here may actually learn something , 11/01/09, by about the last eight years if you type into your address bar. Re: You loyal republicans here may actually learn something , 11/01/09, by Franklin, with a hmmmmm. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by actual result from 2000 to Aug.9, 2004. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by actual result from 2000 to Aug.9, 2004 (THIS ONE). Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by Franklin, but . . . but . . .but. . .. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Kind of catchy, Tim. , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: Kind of revealing, all you party-of-no people , 11/01/09, by You who root for failure of ec. recovery, healthcare reform. Re: Kind of revealing, all you party-of-no people , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by As has been said so often before - - - . Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by OK, Tim. type Bush's broken promises in your address bar. Re: If I type in "Obama's lies", I get , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: Kind of revealing, all you party-of-no people , 11/01/09, by Franklin. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/01/09, by The site has two sections: on the left hand side are Bush's. Re: Where are Obama's pledges/promise on the progressive's site? , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: to "broken promises = lies" You neglected to post , 11/01/09, by that politifact.com says "Promises Kept:49, Compromises: 14,. Re: to "broken promises = lies" You neglected to post , 11/01/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: If I type in "Obama's lies", I get , 11/01/09, by hahaha . Re: Kind of revealing, all you party-of-no people , 11/02/09, by hahaha. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/02/09, by Maggie. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/02/09, by hahaha. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/02/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/02/09, by Franklin. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/03/09, by You say GW's 6 years in Afghanistan were a win?. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/03/09, by Maggie. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/03/09, by Franklin. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/03/09, by Franklin. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/03/09, by Maggie. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: You are confused Maggie , 11/03/09, by Franklin. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/03/09, by Aranby. Re: here's a brief summary of Maggies anger about Bush , 11/03/09, by hahaha. Re: here's a brief summary of Bush's pledge/promises and the , 11/04/09, by aggie'swife. Cooperation over competition! , 10/30/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Setting us up for an even bigger economic crisis! , 10/30/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Setting us up for an even bigger economic crisis! , 10/30/09, by hahaha. Re: Setting us up for an even bigger economic crisis! , 10/30/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Setting us up for an even bigger economic crisis! , 10/30/09, by hahaha. Re: Setting us up for an even bigger economic crisis! , 10/30/09, by Sally. Would you like to see a GOP HealthCare Plan? , 10/29/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Would you like to see a GOP HealthCare Plan? , 10/29/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/29/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/29/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/29/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by The dog ate their homework... Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by The dem proposal is just a very wordy outline. nm. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Then why so much bickering over "nothing"? Heh. nfm. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Maybe they should reign in some of their own. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Why you would trust any of them , 10/30/09, by Franklin. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/30/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Tim, Outline only? No specifics? , 10/31/09, by EasTexSteve. CBS Evening News and AP(Th., Oct. 29) report , 10/29/09, by Sally. Re: CBS Evening News and AP(Th., Oct. 29) report , 10/29/09, by Franklin. The union said what? Oh pulleeease!! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: The union said what?They're saying "we want due process" , 10/29/09, by You dislike the US Constitution, Steve?. Re: The union said what?They're saying "we want due process" , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: The union said what? Oh pulleeease!! , 10/30/09, by EasTexSteve. On Afghanistan , 10/29/09, by L. Swilley . US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by with GDP rising 3.5 percent in third quarter. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by So Steve "US economy shrinking" would be better news for you. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by So. Steve, you don't believe NY Times. How about Forbes?. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by chalkmaven. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by It's called a jobless recovery. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by Franklin, with a huh?????. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by It's just what I have been hearing. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: US Economy grows for first time in a year! , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: "GDP always bumps in the third quarter" , 10/29/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Raw data for Q3 2009? , 10/29/09, by chalkmaven. Re: "GDP always bumps in the third quarter" , 10/30/09, by EasTexSteve. Blanche Lincoln, Democrat from Arkansas , 10/29/09, by Is one of the senators flipping and flopping on the public option. What happend to transparency? Big doners get special acces , 10/28/09, by to the White House(building and President)---Sally. Re: What happend to transparency? Big doners get special ac , 10/28/09, by Hard to say. Which visitors are you upset about?. What will it take for this Adnministration to take note oI , 10/28/09, by Iran's nuclear plans--a nuke in Israel?------Sally. Re: Given the potential for atmospheric drift , 10/28/09, by Iran is unlikely to ever nuke Israel. Re: To: Iran is un;lkely , 10/28/09, by Sally. Re: To: Iran is un;lkely , 10/28/09, by I don't see why he wouldn't; it's a pretty big consideration. Re: U.S. hands are tied as far as Iran and nukes , 10/29/09, by euler. Re: the chain of treaties... , 10/29/09, by euler. Re: map of current military treaty alliances , 10/29/09, by euler. Re: Decent write-up about nukes, Iran, Russia, U.S. , 10/29/09, by euler. Re: Russia prepared to provide Iran with oil if US cuts access , 10/29/09, by euler. Re: The smartest thing our country could do would be , 10/29/09, by to stop tiptoeing around the elephant in the living room. Re: Given the potential for atmospheric drift , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: Given the potential for atmospheric drift , 10/29/09, by I'd certainly still gamble on not going to war with Iran. Re: Given the potential for atmospheric drift , 10/29/09, by hahaha. Re: No need to gamble- we're not going to war with Iran or China , 10/29/09, by hahaha. Re: Given the potential for atmospheric drift , 10/29/09, by Again, it's a rhetorical discussion. Re: We're not going to war with Iran or China , 10/29/09, by Nope, agreed, and that's what I was talking about. :-) nfm. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Perhaps, but I think there's still a significant deterrent. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by I really don't see it happening. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by OK, good, I'm thankful to be totally off base!. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Well I guess that's what I'm asking. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by OK...so if you were in his shoes, what would you do? nfm. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/29/09, by Franklin. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/30/09, by Yeah, that's pretty much what I was thinking. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/30/09, by hahaha. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/30/09, by hahaha. Re: Are some posters dum* ing on Israel and blaming them for all , 10/30/09, by the "trouble" in the Mid East?----Sally. Re: The real concern is not outright nuclear war , 10/30/09, by I'd expect Israel to nuke 'em right back. nfm. Re: Nope, there are loonies aplenty on both sides , 10/30/09, by And history can get very complex. Re: Nope, there are loonies aplenty on both sides , 10/30/09, by Sally. H1N1 vaccine shortage because US regulations are strict , 10/28/09, by chalkmaven. Re: H1N1 vaccine shortage because US regulations are strict , 10/28/09, by Franklin. Re: H1N1 vaccine shortage because US regulations are strict , 10/28/09, by I'd probably go a step further and say No Thimerosal, Period. Drone strikes violate international law? , 10/28/09, by Franklin. Defense and Hate Crimes , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Defense and Hate Crimes , 10/28/09, by Fully agree with you, Tim from MT. Re: Defense and Hate Crimes , 10/28/09, by Here's how it works. Re: Defense and Hate Crimes , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Defense and Hate Crimes , 10/28/09, by That's an interesting point. Re: Defense and Hate Crimes , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Chidren and pregnant women in this area still have no N1H1 , 10/28/09, by vaccine. Somebody dropped the ball.-----Sally. Re: Chidren and pregnant women in this area still have no N1 , 10/28/09, by To Sally from MT -- it's no different. Re: I don't recall many people having , 10/28/09, by such high expectations of GWB. Quite the opposite. Re: I don't recall many people having , 10/28/09, by When there was a shortage of flu vaccine under Bush -- . Re: Not everyone felt that way about him. Take heart , 10/28/09, by I wouldn't have expected him to handle a flu epidemic. Re: Not everyone felt that way about him. Take heart , 10/28/09, by well, it's good to hear you weren't one who blamed. Re: Not everyone felt that way about him. Take heart , 10/28/09, by Absolutely, and what was totally baffling. Re: Chidren and pregnant women in this area still have no N1 , 10/28/09, by but those in jail are getting their swine flu shot. nfm. Re: Chidren and pregnant women in this area still have no N1 , 10/28/09, by So are DC school children. nm. Re: Chidren and pregnant women in this area still have no N1 , 10/28/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: To: such high expectations , 10/28/09, by Sally. Re: To: such high expectations , 10/28/09, by So let me get this straight.... Re: To: such high expectations , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: To: such high expectations , 10/28/09, by Franklin. Re: To: So let me get this straight... , 10/28/09, by Sally. Re: One of the risks people take when they ask questions , 10/28/09, by Is that other people might answer them. Re: Chidren and pregnant women in this area still have no N1 , 10/29/09, by Regarding answering the question - - - . Re: ah but bush people tried to shift all blame to WJC , 10/29/09, by we recall, too. Hmmm. Not too long back, there were those on here , 10/28/09, by who insisted proposed health care plan will not be gov run. Re: Come on, can't we just have some good news , 10/28/09, by without feeling the need to rub anyone's nose in it?. Re: Come on, can't we just have some good news , 10/28/09, by hahaha. One question, please...... , 10/28/09, by Paula. Re: One question, please...... , 10/28/09, by What exactly DO the Republicans want?. Re: One question, please...... , 10/28/09, by hahaha. What was I thinking? , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: I don't care what they call it, as long as I can buy into it , 10/28/09, by without going through the insurance industry. nfm. Re: I don't care what they call it, as long as I can buy int , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: I don't care what they call it, as long as I can buy int , 10/28/09, by 4 years better than never. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into it , 10/28/09, by That's what buying into it means. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into i , 10/28/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into i , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into i , 10/28/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into it , 10/28/09, by My taxes aren't that high. My health costs ARE.. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into i , 10/28/09, by hahaha. Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into it , 10/28/09, by I much prefer kool-aid to red herring. ;-). Re: Don't care what they call it as long as I can buy into i , 10/28/09, by Tim Finnegan. Lieberman has "gov't run" healthcare but would deny it to us , 10/28/09, by Okay, Joe, give up your gov't run plan and live like we do!. Joe Lieberman IS in the pocket of insurance companies , 10/28/09, by Lieberman backing for-profit insurance hold on our health. Re: Joe Lieberman IS in the pocket of insurance companies , 10/28/09, by Uggh...he's such a tool. Re: Isn't Lieberman too large to fit in a pocket? , 10/28/09, by hahaha. Re: Isn't Lieberman too large to fit in a pocket? , 10/28/09, by He's split between multiple pockets. nfm. What I like about the Health Care Proposal..... , 10/28/09, by Marilyn. Re: What I like about the Health Care Proposal..... , 10/28/09, by LOL! Loved it! nfm. Re: What I like about the Health Care Proposal..... , 10/28/09, by Best part in my opinion is the public option. nfm. When will we get rid of this guy? , 10/27/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: When will we get rid of this guy? , 10/27/09, by hahaha . Re: When will we get rid of this guy? , 10/27/09, by Not much say about it unless we live in Florida. nfm. Worth the watching , 10/27/09, by L. Swilley . Joe Lieberman opposes accessible, affordable health care , 10/27/09, by Says he'll vote "No" - long history of support for pharms, insurance co's. Sen. Joe Lieberman opposes affordable, accessible healthcare , 10/27/09, by Says he will vote "NO." Joe, friend of the insurance industry. About Sending More Troops , 10/25/09, by old regular. Re: About Sending More Troops , 10/25/09, by The military absolutely is doing that. Re: About Sending More Troops , 10/25/09, by what about the cia?. Re: what about the cia?. , 10/25/09, by op. Re: what about ..."Clinton's Military Legacy" President , 10/25/09, by Bush owes a major debt of gratitude to his predecessor,. Re: what about the cia?. , 10/26/09, by Yeah, what about them?. Re: About Sending More Troops , 10/26/09, by It's tricky..... Re: About Sending More Troops , 10/26/09, by hahaha. Re: Send more troops? , 10/27/09, by L. Swilley . Re: Send more troops? The decision, , 10/27/09, by Franklin. The Obama Cover-up , 10/26/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/26/09, by Aranby. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/26/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/26/09, by Franklin. Re: This issue is more complex , 10/26/09, by Than can be summed up in a single editorial. Re: I don't think that's it. Rendition, per se , 10/26/09, by doesn't seem the central issue in this lawsuit. Re: I don't think that's it. Rendition, per se , 10/26/09, by Franklin. Re: I don't think that's it. Rendition, per se , 10/26/09, by Rendition is still happening, but. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/26/09, by same old thing. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/26/09, by What I'm totally not getting. Re: I don't think that's it. Rendition, per se , 10/26/09, by Franklin. Re: I don't think that's it. Rendition, per se , 10/26/09, by It's my understanding. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by Not make pictures public???????. Re: I didn't get it then , 10/27/09, by And I don't get it now. Re: If you don't know by now , 10/27/09, by That our government was torturing people. Re: Yes, you must see the pictures! It is our history! , 10/27/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by Nino/Can. Re: If you don't know by now- I doubt you ever had a clue , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: Yes, you must see the pictures! It is our history! , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by Nino/Can. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by same old thing. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? , 10/27/09, by Franklin. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up: old thing can't learn a new trick , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up , 10/27/09, by to hahaha.....Nino/Can. Re: The Obama Cover-up- lil nino , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up, Nino , 10/27/09, by Franklin. Re: It's sure as hell not my history. If YOU choose , 10/27/09, by to take personal responsibility for a bunch of nuts. Re: The Obama Cover-up- lil nino , 10/27/09, by Nino/Can. Re: The Obama Cover-up, Nino , 10/27/09, by to Franklin....Nino/Can. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? Wrong again Franklin! , 10/27/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: The Obama Cover-up- lil nino , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: The Obama Cover-up, Nino , 10/27/09, by Franklin. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? Wrong again Franklin! , 10/27/09, by Franklin. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? franklin was right , 10/27/09, by hahaha. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? franklin was right , 10/27/09, by same old thing. Re: DAMN! Did one of youse guys run off , 10/27/09, by with the other one's wife or something?. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? Wrong again Franklin! , 10/28/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? Wrong again tec , 10/28/09, by hahaha. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? Wrong again tec , 10/28/09, by same old thing. Re: Re:Why did you do that, tec?? Wrong again Franklin! , 10/28/09, by Franklin. Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by What's that? The truth?. Re: ;~) , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven -- nfm. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by What funny is watching someone defend . . . . Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by News flash: Nobody cares what you believe. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by obviously it makes a difference to you . . . . . Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Sebelius DID state clearly that the gov would provide. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Nope, not a whit.. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Sebelius is not Obama. NFM. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by so, Obama ISN'T in charge? nm. Re: To: Sebelius DID state clearly that the gov would provid.... , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven -- Source?. Re: To: Sebelius DID state clearly that the gov would provid , 10/25/09, by Here. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Franklin - your silly little game , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven -- Source?. Re: A game, chalkmaven? , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: To: Sebelius DID state clearly that the gov would provid , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Replying to yourself? Just curious. nfm. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by When somebody today said you had like 11 screen names. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Nope, no need to worry about me. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by LOL...no. By "thick" I meant "familiar". Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! Franklann, please cite your , 10/25/09, by source that shows the government guaranteed there would be. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Sorry...you'll have to stick with Sally. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! Franklann, please cite your , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! Get a grip, people. , 10/26/09, by hahaha. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! , 10/26/09, by LOL! You can be funny when you let your guard down. nfm. Re: Vaccine was NOT PROMISED! Get a grip, people. , 10/26/09, by I doubt the sarcasm escaped anyone. nfm. Re: To: Sebelius DID state clearly that the gov would provid , 10/26/09, by and they will send 10% to other countries. nm. Re: And that's an excellent plan. We don't need , 10/26/09, by third-world countries incubating next year's flu. nfm. Re: And that's an excellent plan. We don't need , 10/26/09, by Should we put other countries above our own citizens?. Re: And that's an excellent plan. We don't need , 10/26/09, by When that happens, I'll get back to you. nfm. H1N1 , 10/25/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: H1N1 to T.E.C. , 10/25/09, by MT. Re: TEC - you've just wasted your time , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven. Re: H1N1 to T.E.C. , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Kathleen would disapprove, chalkmaven!!!! , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Quoting you Ann aka Franklin/Rebeccah/ed/Harry S./etc, , 10/25/09, by Chiding?. Re: H1N1 to T.E.C. , 10/25/09, by Aranby. Re: Quoting you Ann aka Franklin/Rebeccah/ed/Harry S./etc, , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: H1N1 to T.E.C. , 10/25/09, by casting off. Re: Quoting you Ann aka Franklin/Rebeccah/ed/Harry S./etc, , 10/25/09, by To Franken. Re: Quoting you Ann aka Franklin/Rebeccah/ed/Harry S./etc, , 10/25/09, by Wow. That's a whole lot of screen names. nfm. Re: H1N1 to MT , 10/25/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: Quoting you Ann aka Franklin/Rebeccah/ed/Harry S./etc, , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Franklin, has your Google quit working? , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Quoting you Ann aka Franklin/Rebeccah/ed/Harry S./etc, , 10/25/09, by Can't blame her. So do I. Too many nuts on the Internet. Re: Franklin, has your Google quit working? , 10/25/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: H1N1 to T.E.C. , 10/25/09, by to Aranby - from MT. Re: Franklin, has your Google quit working? , 10/25/09, by LOL...some of you guys are a trip. Re: Franklin, has your Google quit working? , 10/25/09, by Franklin, to chalkmaven. Re: Franklin, has your Google quit working? , 10/25/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Re:Hey, Nino , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Re:Hey, Nino , 10/25/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Re:Hey, Nino and chalkmaven , 10/25/09, by Franlin. Re: Re:Hey, Nino and chalkmaven , 10/25/09, by Yet another relevant link. No climate change conference for Obama , 10/24/09, by Not that important I guess. Re: No climate change conference for Obama , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Woman Denied Health Coverage After Rape , 10/24/09, by another denial based upon post rape meds = "pre-existing condition" . Re: Woman Denied Health Coverage After Rape , 10/24/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: Woman Denied Health Coverage After Rape , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Is something wrong here? , 10/24/09, by cc. Re: Is something wrong here? yes, you forgot to cite source , 10/24/09, by From where did you copy this article? thanks! nfm. Re: Is something wrong here? yes, you forgot to cite source , 10/24/09, by link inside. Re: Re:yes, you forgot to cite source - Oh, it's from Fox news. , 10/24/09, by Found it on Fox site. nfm. Re: Re:yes, you forgot to cite source - Oh, it's from Fox ne , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: The end of the world as we know it?!?!? , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/24/09, by Sally thinks this is evidence of poor planning and.... Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/24/09, by Does this mean you couldn't explain the Hamlet quote? nfm. Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: I KNOW -- I KNOW the answer! , 10/24/09, by chalkmaven. Re: I KNOW -- I KNOW the answer! , 10/24/09, by Franklin, yes in part. Re: I knew.... , 10/24/09, by chalkmaven. Re: I knew.... , 10/24/09, by Franklin. . Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by Jo. Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by Then why not use words like "We hope to have". Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by Do you honestly expect anyone to believe. Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by To me -- we hope to have is admitting one can't control. Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by And if anyone had said "hope we have". Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by a couple of broken promises -- not so big -- -- . Re: Why were we promised the vaccine by a certain date? , 10/25/09, by Again, it's America. Re: Did the CDC 'pinkie swear'? , 10/25/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Did the CDC 'pinkie swear'? , 10/25/09, by Tim Finnegan. Here is what I want , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: I agree , 10/24/09, by chalkmaven. Re: I agree , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: I agree , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Here is what I want , 10/24/09, by You are a liar, Franklin... Re: To the poster calling franklin a liar , 10/25/09, by you don't speak for everyone -- stop pretending to. Re: Here is what I want , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: You know what, anon? , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: Do you people ever go to the non-partisan site polifact. , 10/25/09, by com? It keeps track of Obama's promises kept (49). Re: Do you people ever go to the non-partisan site polifact. , 10/25/09, by To "com" -- -- Transparency in government was a BIG BIG. Re: Do you people ever go to the non-partisan site polifact. , 10/25/09, by His "broken promises" don't bother me one iota. Re: Do you people ever go to the non-partisan site polifact. , 10/25/09, by to broken promises. Re: Do you people ever go to the non-partisan site polifact. , 10/25/09, by This is America; you're entitled to your opinion. last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by our gov is donating a boatload of H1N1 to other countries. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by Link -- 10% of our vaccine is going elsewhere. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by aggie'swife. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by chalkmaven. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by chalkmaven. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by just me. Re: H1N1 vaccine is FDA approved , 10/24/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by That, to me, is a more interesting question. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Because . Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by So it's not so much a matter of "can't" as "won't." nfm. Re: last night I heard on the local news , 10/24/09, by We are not the only ones affected.. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Not enough hours in the day, I'm afraid. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Franklin, with an "I see.". Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Are you attempting to suggest. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by How does that explain. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by That's not answering the question. nfm. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Perhaps you should seek out a weekend yoga tutor. Re: Why can't the US develop OUR own vaccine? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug company profits more than double Fortune 500s , 10/24/09, by Not shabby. Re: D r ug company profits more than double Fortune 500s , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug company profits more than double Fortune 500s , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Taxpayers subsidize d ru g research then pharms fleece US. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Pharmaceutical lobby can help KILL reform, so negotiate. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Republicans fear politcal loss if Democrats win reform fight. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Seems like they're a little late. nfm. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Once reform happens people will wish it happened decades ago. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by Same arguments were used against FDR, Soc. Sec. & Medicare. Re: D r ug co profits more than double Fortune 500s profits , 10/24/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Ironic that you recommend Real Clear Politics , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/25/09, by Yes, they said the same about FDR. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/25/09, by FDR served three full terms. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/25/09, by Yes, they said the same about FDR. Re: About Social Security and Medicare , 10/25/09, by Franklin. Hypocritical? , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Hypocritical? Yep, but hey, , 10/23/09, by Who gave you permission to notice all that?. Re: Hypocritical? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Post for administrative review , 10/23/09, by What's this all about? I post a respons on the politics board and . Re: Post for administrative review , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Post for administrative review , 10/23/09, by There's probably one word in your response. Re: Post for administrative review , 10/23/09, by just me. Re: Post for administrative review , 10/23/09, by Same thing happens on every board. CDC flu vaccine status , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. World Health Organization - H1N1 vaccine production , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: World Health Organization - H1N1 vaccine production , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: World Health Organization - H1N1 vaccine production , 10/23/09, by A lot of our students have gotten the nasal vaccine. nfm. Re: Franklin, who is at fault? , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Franklin, who is at fault? , 10/24/09, by aggie'swife. Re: Franklin, who is at fault? , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Franklin, who is at fault? , 10/24/09, by Franklin (this one). Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Sally who thinks " someone" has dropped the ball. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? , 10/23/09, by Held up overseas. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Children are dying and will continue to die , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Children are dying and will continue to die , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Children are dying and will continue to die , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Children are dying and will continue to die , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Nino - is there enough..... , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Children are dying and will continue to die , 10/23/09, by Nino/Can. Re: Children are dying and will continue to die , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: News from Canada on vaccine availability , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Ah, but you're missing the whole point. Re: News from Canada on vaccine availability , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/23/09, by Nino/Can. Re: News from Canada on vaccine availability , 10/23/09, by Nino/Can. Re: News from Canada on vaccine availability , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: News from Canada on vaccine availability , 10/23/09, by Seems like you're confusing H1N1 with seasonal flu. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: Where is the N1H1 vaccine? Children are dying. , 10/24/09, by You have no understanding of science. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by hahaha. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by Hey now...let's give Ronald Reagan the credit he's due. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by T.E.C. - Iowa. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by hahaha. Re: The CDC!!!!! , 10/24/09, by Franklin, with a HUH??????. Re: The CDC!!!!! Franklin , 10/24/09, by hahaha. Re: The CDC!!!!! Franklin , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: The CDC!!!!! Franklin , 10/24/09, by hahaha. Re: The CDC!!!!! Franklin , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: The CDC!!!!! Franklin , 10/25/09, by hahaha. (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline stories , 10/23/09, by --"White House VS FOX". Anybody else see this?. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by I have searched and searched the CBS website. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: To : have searched and searched CBS website , 10/23/09, by Sally. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Sally to Franklin. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by "The Page Cannot Be Found". Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Franklin says this is BS. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by OK, ok, I got the first one to work. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Well, yeah, some of them should just get over it. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by link. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by link. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by link. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Actually, I'd love to see Tim G. out the door. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by No, I think Obama's capable of speaking for himself. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Well, yeah, but he was answering a question. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by Yeah, I don't trust the guy. Re: To: Well, yeah, but he was answering a question , 10/23/09, by Sally. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/23/09, by I missed the SNL event altogether. Re: To: Well, yeah, but he was answering a question , 10/23/09, by Too much for what? Missing your meaning here. nfm. Re: To: To much for what? Missing your meaning here. nfm , 10/23/09, by Sally. Re: To: To much for what? Missing your meaning here. nfm , 10/23/09, by Caught that much, Gertrude, or Sally, or whatever. Re: To:Caught that much, Gertrude, or Sally or whatever , 10/23/09, by Sally! Got it? It's always "Sally". Not going too fasf. Re: Should be "not going too FAST, not fasf" , 10/24/09, by Sally. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/24/09, by EasTexSteve. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/24/09, by The situation seems quite simple. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/24/09, by to "No, I think" with a question. Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/24/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: To:Caught that much, Gertrude, or Sally or whatever , 10/24/09, by "They stumble that run fast.". Re: (CBS Evening News, Th., Oct.23, '09) One of headline sto , 10/24/09, by Such remarks are always easily traced to the speaker. nfm. Re: To: "They stumble that run fast? , 10/24/09, by Sally does not understand the relevance of the qoute and... . Re: To: "They stumble that run fast? , 10/24/09, by Sally does not understand the relevance of the qoute and... . Re: Apologies for TWO premature posts , 10/24/09, by Sally, who will try again. Re: To: "They stumble that run fast? , 10/24/09, by It's a "qoute" from Romeo and Juliet. Re: This One to "They...fast" , 10/24/09, by Sally. Re: This One to "They...fast" , 10/24/09, by Heh heh. Tell you what.... Re: To Heh heh, Tell you what , 10/24/09, by Sally, who thinks you did not get what I was inferring. Re: To Heh heh, Tell you what , 10/24/09, by I absolutely did not know what you were inferring. Re: To: I absolutely did not know what you were inferring , 10/24/09, by Sally. Re: To: I absolutely did not know what you were inferring , 10/24/09, by Sally. Re: To: I absolutely did not know what you were inferring , 10/24/09, by So first you mangle Shakespeare completely out of context. Re: To: I absolutely did not know what you were inferring , 10/24/09, by And by the way. Re: To: Sally , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Actually, I'm online researching Indochinese history , 10/24/09, by You folks are a tiny window of diversion. Re: Actually, I'm online researching Indochinese history , 10/24/09, by while you are at it, . Re: Actually, I'm online researching Indochinese history , 10/24/09, by They all work in the White House. Re: Actually, I'm online researching Indochinese history , 10/24/09, by Franklin. Re: Actually, I'm online researching Indochinese history , 10/24/09, by For as long as I can remember (and trust me -- I can. Re: To : Franklin , 10/24/09, by Sally. Re: All official White House communication is easily available , 10/24/09, by On the White House website. Re: Actually, I'm online researching Indochinese history , 10/24/09, by Sadly, Walter Cronkite is no longer with us. Re: All official White House communication is easily availab , 10/25/09, by Tim Finnegan. Re: All official White House communication is easily availab , 10/25/09, by Yes, I heard that interview, what about it?. Would you have OnStar in your vehicle? , 10/23/09, by chalkmaven. Re: Would you have OnStar in your vehicle? , 10/23/09, by LAman. Re: Would you have OnStar in your vehicle? , 10/23/09, by the black box is way different than on star. Re: Would you have OnStar in your vehicle? , 10/23/09, by hahaha. Re: Would you have OnStar in your vehicle? , 10/23/09, by This thread reminds me that my son. Re: Would you have OnStar in your vehicle? , 10/23/09, by Franklin. Re: No.. and I REFUSE to volunteer , 10/23/09, by Because Obama is MAO nfm.
Other Chatboards in this Category...
