|
|

Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading
Posted by Jen on 7/03/08
On 6/25/08, Chrissie wrote:
> The reason you won't find much to support round-robin reading
> is that such reading involves only one person out of your
> class at a time. The others are hopefully following along
> but in reality are probably disengaged. Partner reading
> engages 50% of your class at a time. I think most teachers
> still use some round robin reading but if you are set on
> improving fluency, other methods are much more productive.
I have students who want to read aloud list their names on the
board, then take turns reading aloud, along with me. But, they
read anywhere from one paragraph to 1 1/2 page, what ever they
feel comfortable with. I also prompt the whole class with
questions as we read, which they have to answer in writing, as
we go. I also circulate through the room, and if a student is
not tracking along, they lose reading participation points. We
also do before/during/after reading activities and discuss
vocabulary. Would this be considered "Round Robin Reading"?
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 5/14/08, by Authors, publications etc needed.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 5/16/08, by I don't think there is any.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 5/18/08, by sue.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 6/25/08, by Chrissie.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 7/03/08, by Jen.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 7/04/08, by connie.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 7/04/08, by connie.
- Re: Looking for research supporting round robin reading, 7/08/08, by okjoan.
|