Re: Reading Recovery vs. Masters vs. new programs?
Posted by suzy on 3/16/08
I have a masters as a literacy specialist/reading specialist. I switched districts to learn RR. It is my 10th year in RR. RR is not short on comprehension. Each child has a program made for him/her. It is the keeping of the balance between all three sources of information (meaning, structural and visual) that is what the child has to learn as he/she makes meaning from the text. The RRT is responsible for having a child make a shift in learning every single day. It is a lot work, a lot of analyzing each and every day. Yearly recertification, 6 sessions of continuous contact per year and a lesson behind a one way glass in which your RR colleagues learn as they watch you and you learn as they talk with you after your lesson. The point is to help the child. It is extrememly rewarding. It is hard, especially when you are working with children with severe emotional problems, who have IEPs already. There is alot of paperwork, report writing, entering of data on national site. It is a certification program = 6 graduate hours. I love it. I am a very experienced teacher. I take everything I know and incorporate it (at least I try!) into a child's lesson for that day and then the next one, etc. Work with classroom teachers and parents, if they will. On 3/14/08, beth wrote: > Hi > I got a master's in literacy last year and a reading > specialist certification. I am familiar with Reading > Recovery, but not with the other two programs that you > metion. The best training that I have gotten ANYWHERE from > my undergrad through my masters, has been RR. It is hands on > and you are able to get results in a relatively short amount > of time with most children. See the results and evaluate day > to day as to what the child needs. As a teacher you work from > his strengths and build on them. For myself, I really believe > in this program. So much of what I have learned in RR is > carried over to all the early grades, K-3 because so many > children are on different instructional levels. > On 3/11/08, Mindy wrote: >> I am a reading specialist looking into further training. I >> don't have my Masters but am already teaching reading >> because of experience. I would love current, practical >> training in teaching reading in a balanced approach. >> >> I have looked into a Master's at a local university, >> Reading Recovery, Linda Mood Bell, and Read Right. >> However, I don't want to waste my time and money on >> something that is not practical and balanced. >> >> What training would you recommend? Why? >> What are new programs, because Reading Recovery seems >> good, but not balanced in comprehension? >> How beneficial is a Master's Degree in Reading? >> >> Thanks! >> >>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Reading Recovery vs. Masters vs. new programs?, 3/11/08, by Mindy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. Masters vs. new programs?, 3/14/08, by beth.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. Masters vs. new programs?, 3/16/08, by suzy.
- Re: Reading Recovery/ To Suzy, 3/17/08, by marann.
- Re: Reading Recovery/ To Suzy, 3/17/08, by suzy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 3/25/08, by Mindy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 3/29/08, by SS.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 3/30/08, by Vickie.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 3/31/08, by Mindy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 3/31/08, by suzy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 3/31/08, by suzy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/02/08, by New Teacher.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/02/08, by suzy.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/03/08, by k kyes.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/04/08, by George.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/09/08, by SS.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/24/08, by I vote for RR!!!!!!!!.
- Re: Reading Recovery vs. LindaMood-Bell, 4/25/08, by suzy.
|