chat center
SUBSCRIBE MY LINKS:

Latest Posts Full Chatboard Submit Post

 


Re: Reading Recovery vs. Masters vs. new programs?
Posted by suzy on 3/16/08

    I have a masters as a literacy specialist/reading specialist.
    I switched districts to learn RR. It is my 10th year in RR.
    RR is not short on comprehension. Each child has a program
    made for him/her. It is the keeping of the balance between
    all three sources of information (meaning, structural and
    visual) that is what the child has to learn as he/she makes
    meaning from the text. The RRT is responsible for having a
    child make a shift in learning every single day. It is a lot
    work, a lot of analyzing each and every day. Yearly
    recertification, 6 sessions of continuous contact per year and
    a lesson behind a one way glass in which your RR colleagues
    learn as they watch you and you learn as they talk with you
    after your lesson. The point is to help the child. It is
    extrememly rewarding. It is hard, especially when you are
    working with children with severe emotional problems, who have
    IEPs already. There is alot of paperwork, report writing,
    entering of data on national site. It is a certification
    program = 6 graduate hours. I love it. I am a very
    experienced teacher. I take everything I know and incorporate
    it (at least I try!) into a child's lesson for that day and
    then the next one, etc. Work with classroom teachers and
    parents, if they will.

    On 3/14/08, beth wrote:
    > Hi
    > I got a master's in literacy last year and a reading
    > specialist certification. I am familiar with Reading
    > Recovery, but not with the other two programs that you
    > metion. The best training that I have gotten ANYWHERE from
    > my undergrad through my masters, has been RR. It is hands
    on
    > and you are able to get results in a relatively short amount
    > of time with most children. See the results and evaluate day
    > to day as to what the child needs. As a teacher you work
    from
    > his strengths and build on them. For myself, I really
    believe
    > in this program. So much of what I have learned in RR is
    > carried over to all the early grades, K-3 because so many
    > children are on different instructional levels.
    > On 3/11/08, Mindy wrote:
    >> I am a reading specialist looking into further training. I
    >> don't have my Masters but am already teaching reading
    >> because of experience. I would love current, practical
    >> training in teaching reading in a balanced approach.
    >>
    >> I have looked into a Master's at a local university,
    >> Reading Recovery, Linda Mood Bell, and Read Right.
    >> However, I don't want to waste my time and money on
    >> something that is not practical and balanced.
    >>
    >> What training would you recommend? Why?
    >> What are new programs, because Reading Recovery seems
    >> good, but not balanced in comprehension?
    >> How beneficial is a Master's Degree in Reading?
    >>
    >> Thanks!
    >>
    >>

     
     

You are on the REMEDIAL READING CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

Sponsors  

New Moms Wanted!
Join the community for new and expecting moms. Check out Maternityville.com Maternity Chat!

Free Lesson Plans
Thousands of lesson plans and curriculum ideas! teachers.net/lessons

Teaching Jobs
Thousands of teaching jobs and other jobs in education - visit jobs.teachers.net

Other Chatboards in this Category...
  English Center Chatboards

Check out the latest additions to the Lesson Bank...
 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lessons Contacts PR Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.