More | Report Post

On 10/24/09, Teresa wrote:
> You have no understanding of how to balance..how the left balances the
> right. Your statements show you have no understanding of how badly
> the animals were treated before PETA and the Humane society came into
> focus. The two opposite extremes balance each other out. Cancer
> Research would be FAR less effective if we did not have an
> ethical "policing" of treatment policies. I speak from experience,
> stressed out animals do not model disease well.
>
> You are writing as a person who sees only the negative side of life.
> Can't both sides be a little right? Why do you have to jump to the
> opposite extreme? Take some time and think about what you are saying
> before you write it.
>
> Gun control does not equal no guns
> Abortion rights does not equal abortions for everyone
> Saving one tree does not mean you have to save them all
>
> Take a deep breath before going down the slippery slope for all your
> statements. No one likes to be around people who cannot see both sides
> of an issue...breathe...
>

Wow you sure seem to know a lot about me considering you have never met me.
I stand by my statements. PETA as an organization, and most
environmentalist groups have become very radical. That is a fact, they
themselves live on the extreme bringing frivolous lawsuits against
individuals which deny them their property rights. Now tell me that isn't
a fact. You say that abortion for some doesn't mean abortion for all. Well
yes, in a legal sense it does. We are not talking about legal rights here
we are talking about ethics. Now tell me it isn't hypocritical and
unethical when a person spends his/her waking hours fighting to take away a
persons property rights to save a frog but then advocates a woman's right
to kill her unborn baby at will. This is certainly more of a direct
comparison than your comparison of cancer research vs. PETA. Nonsense!

Next Post >>

Posts on this thread, including this one