You have no idea what I teach. Do you teach your students to
make assumptions and call people names? Nice example your
setting...You make ridiculous arguments.

I would still proudly give up property to open space or anyone
one else who would like to save a species. I love our planet
and am not attached to property I can't take with me. I would
rather give it to the generations of children who come after me.

Goodbye.

On 10/25/09, Down with PETA wrote:
> "and, yes, I would give up my property to save a frog (I am
> a science teacher after all)..."
>
> LOL! This pretty much says it all. Scientists are suppose
> to be objective. Even if the answer is not what you want to
> hear. You represent what is wrong with science today. You
> are not teaching science at all, you are teaching politics.
> You belong in a different classroom.
>
> I am not right wing, by the way. I don't think we should be
> teaching creationism in the classroom because it is not
> science. I do not believe we should be teaching that all
> species are worth saving - that defies nature and science in
> itself. I am not a wacko pro lifer either. But I am not a
> hypocrite like many so called scientists are. I suggest you
> take a look at your own value system and think about what
> you are teaching your students.
>
> Have a great weekend and go step on a bug. But be careful,
> according to PETA the bug should be afforded a free lawyer
> at our expense.

Share This Post | Report This Post

Next Post >>

Posts on this thread, including this one