Alerts
New Jobs on Teachers.Net

Springdale Job Corps C...
Anywhere

Holy Redeemer School
Kensington

Aspen School District
Aspen

Skyline Ranch K8
Queen Creek

Texarkana School Distr...
Texarkana

Needham Public Schools
Needham

AMIKids Panama City Ma...
Panama City

Subjects


    Re: Why study history
    HBarbosa


    11/10/10, HBarbosa
    I think Churchill said it best as to why we study History. History
    is a great way to see what happened in the past and grow and learn
    from it and if we do not pay any attention to it them we are
    doomed. I think that it is sad that many schools in the So. Cal
    have taken it out of the curriculum, such as the elementry schools
    that I have visited. I am training to be a 6th grade History
    teacher and I have a feeling that many of my students are going to
    come into my class not knowing any prior knowledge. I will have to
    change up my lessons some to accomidate this, but I think that the
    students may be excited to learn about it because they havent had
    much teaching of it. I think that history is very important and I
    cant wait to make sure my students understand that as well.
    On 11/11/10, Megan R wrote:
    > I think that this is a great idea, especially if this is done at
    > the beginning of the school year.
    >
    > On 10/27/10, veteran history teacher wrote:
    >> On 10/25/10, Cathy wrote:
    >>> I teach 7th/8th grade history. I would like to teach a
    >>> quick one week unit on why we study history. I have a few
    >>> ideas, but wondering if anyone has a great lesson they do
    >>> for this. Thanks.
    >>
    >>
    >> I do but - the answer to it is surprising.
    >> Winston Churchill said we study history to avoid the mistakes
    >> of the past. "He who forgets the past is doomed to repeat
    >> it." was really what he said and history teachers have used
    >> that for years to justify the study of history (although
    >> that's not what Churchill was talking about at all really)
    >>
    >> So I have the kids write down three things in world history -
    >> or US history - that they think should never have happened.
    >> (natural disasters don't count and the war in Iraq is off-
    >> limits, sorry) I tell them they can take three things out of
    >> history - what three things will they be?
    >>
    >> NO conferring with neighbors- just this once. No discussion -
    >> just this once.
    >>
    >> So they do but usually they press me for 'what do you mean -
    >> a mistake?' Then I say - something that happened from which
    >> NO good came.
    >> This list should be three things in human history from which
    >> NOTHING positive came.
    >>
    >> Now they're really thinking...
    >>
    >> And then when done, I say let's see if we're in consensus on
    >> anything. Surprisingly, we're mostly not. Some kids will
    >> write down the Holocaust - who wouldn't? - but some protest
    >> saying it gave rise to the state of Israel and they see that
    >> as good (very touchy subject there)
    >>
    >> What I'd like is if an entire class could come to consensus
    >> on just one thing being a mistake - in that it should not
    >> have happened. One year the only thing the kids could agree
    >> on as being purely bad with NO positive outcome was the
    >> invention of the spray can. ( I'm tempted to agree with that
    >> but then we had a kid whose dad was s surgeon who saved lives
    >> somehow with spray cans and since then no class will come to
    >> consensus again on the spray can)
    >>
    >> Anyway, the kids love the thought exercise and almost never
    >> can 20+ kids ever agree on any one thing in human history
    >> having had absolutely no positive outcome at all. Maybe it's
    >> a testament to their ability to think positively ( I
    >> personally see no good from the Iraq war and that's why I put
    >> it off limits from the exercise - to me it's an easy answer
    >> to an otherwise hard question)
    >>
    >> But some of my colleagues say this exercise defeats their
    >> purpose of trying to talk kids into studying history. I
    >> disagree. It gets them thinking and my kids are too smart
    >> anyway to be swooped up by Churchill's comment anyway.
    >>
    >> Then I spend the year showing them the ins and outs of
    >> history - modesty aside, kids like my class and they almost
    >> immediately stop asking 'why do we have to study history'
    >> because they like the class.
    >>
    >> History is the rich drama of the human experience - there
    >> just can't be anything boring about the mad sweep of people
    >> across the planet. All the family of nations is is something
    >> like a group of students all jockeying for social status and
    >> extra lunch money. If kids are saying history is boring, it
    >> can be time to reconsider how we're teaching it.