| Jobs for Teachers |
|
PE Teacher (50%)
Brandeis Hillel Day School San Francisco, CA |
|
On-Site School Nurse
Middlebury Interactive Languages Swarthmore, PA |
|
Get Away to an Adventure: Teach in China!
Learn Yu Wen, Inc. Boston, MA |
|
Reading Teachers Needed in Taiwan
Knowledge Tree New Taipei City, Asia |
|
Science Teacher (Middle School)
Brandeis Hillel Day School San Francisco, CA |
| More Teaching Jobs Like These... |
I've been trying to use GradeCam to grade my benchmark exams, as
well as the normal quizzes in class. It has the potential to tell
you what your kids are choosing, which is nice. But so far, I can't
say I've had the greatest results. I had a camera problem, but they
quickly sent me a new camera. The second camera works, but I have
to put a box over the camera and paper to cut down on the light.
Otherwise the papers are over-exposed and it doesn't read. I wrote
to support, but this time I still haven't received a response. So
far I haven't had any luck moving my scores to my gradebook, but
that might be me. It's not obvious.
On 2/22/08, JST wrote:
> I completely disagree. I've been using it for the last two
> years and found it to be an immensely valuable tool. I've
> always been amazed at how poorly a student can bubble it in and
> it will still read if fine. Much better than scantron in this
> regard. It's really a life saver.
>
> On 2/20/08, MARK wrote:
>> teacher in fifth grade tried it a year ago and found it buggy
> and hoped it was
>> better now but still quits in the middle of a quiz and won't
> retain grades so must
>> scan all forms again. It is very picky on how it wants the
> bubbles to be filled in
>> and my student aren't consistent enough to make it practical.
> sorry i must call
>> the 200 dollar investment a waste!
Posts on this thread, including this one