Search Teachers.Net
NV Teachers Chatboard
NEW POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST


(30 Subscribers)


Click Here
Childcare   Preschool   Kindergarten   Elementary   First Grade   Second Grade   Third Grade   Fourth Grade   Fifth Grade   Middle School   High School   College

4Blocks   Art   Building Blocks   Computers   ESL/Language   Games   Geography   Health   History   Literature   Math   Music   Physical Education   Reading/Writing   Science   Special Education   Social Studies

AL   AK   AZ   AR   CA   CO   CT   DE   DC   FL   GA   HI   ID   IL   IN   IA   KS   KY   LA    ME   MD   MA   MI   MN   MS   MO   MT   NE   NV   NH   NJ   NM   NY   NC   ND   OH   OK   OR   PA   RI   SC   SD   TN   TX   UT   VT   VA   WA   WV   WI   WY

Teacher Recipes
Click Here





Hot off the presses: the November Teachers.Net Gazette....

    Re: WONDERING
    Posted by: NO SIGNING BONUS on 7/03/09

    WOW! I wish the whiner would QUIT asking. There is no
    signing bonus, no matter how many times the whiner asks.
    The extra week is for orientation purpose.

    What is this embarassing statement that just because it
    was done before, didn't mean it's right?

    Is it more like, such extra work week can happen to
    everyone in CCSD previously, but not ME?

    And what is the point of such innuendo that if it's
    allowed to work the new teachers for an extra week, then
    we might end up working one extra month for free?

    I can already see what's coming from those laid off
    teachers from other states - lazy, greedy, and self-
    centered. Although s/he wants to come across as "valuing
    his/her time", it's not fooling anyone. Oh brother. Let's
    brace for LQ, whineing, selfish teachers.

    On 7/03/09, No wrote:
    > No, there are no signing bonuses this year, there is no
    > need for them with
    > such a huge pool of teachers. These were to attract
    > teachers when the state was desperate for them.
    >
    > On 7/03/09, ok then... wrote:
    >> is there going to be a signing bonus this year or
    >> not?On 7/02/09, they told me about it wrote:
    >>> I was hired last summer and did receive the hiring
    >>> bonus as well, but the induction and mentoring
    >>> progam was explained fully to us. Last year they
    >>> started new hires at step 3, which is now step one,
    >>> but at the time we started on step 3 on the
    >>> condition that we completed the program. If we
    >>> chose not to do the program we would not be brought
    >>> down to the lower pay but we woule not get the step
    >>> increases for I think it was 2 years? The way it
    >>> was explained it was worth going ahea with the
    >>> program. Now there is no step 1 and 2 that started
    >>> at I think 30,000 a year but you have to do the
    >>> induction program. It seems to work it self out in
    >>> the long run and you do get some neat books and
    >>> supplies at the sessions. The bonuses started
    >>> becasue of the desperate need to lure teachers to
    >>> Nevada, now there are more teachers applying than
    >>> they can use so why would they give a bonus when
    >>> there is no longer a need to?That would be very
    >>> foolish to continue don't you think, I was actually
    >>> surprised that they did not stop it last year.
    >>>
    >>> On 7/02/09, ML wrote:
    >>>> I was hired last summer and I DID receive a
    >>>> signing bonus. I was hired late, so I did not
    >>>> attend orientation but was still expected to have
    >>>> all components of the induction program completed
    >>>> before the end of the year. It was never
    >>>> discussed when I was hired.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 7/02/09, huh wrote:
    >>>>> So if I am reading this correctly there wasn't
    >>>>> a signing bonus last year either? When did the
    >>>>> signing bonus stop?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 7/02/09, read the contract wrote:
    >>>>>> The contract has the number of contracted
    >>>>>> days written on it, the extra days are
    >>>>>> included in that number. The teacher
    >>>>>> orientation tells you all about the new
    >>>>>> teacher induction program, I know I was at
    >>>>>> it. You are also told at this time what you
    >>>>>> do or do not recieve for attending. You know
    >>>>>> what you are in for before you ever sign your
    >>>>>> actual contract none of it is hidden if you
    >>>>>> read your paper work and listen to the
    >>>>>> information provided to you.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On 7/02/09, Nothing I have received so far wrote:
    >>>>>>> mentions working a week without pay or any
    >>>>>>> additional training time. When is that
    >>>>>>> disclosded?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Also, if you follow the thread, you'll
    >>>>>>> notice that there two different posters.
    >>>>>>> And I'm curious what lead you to conclude
    >>>>>>> the sex of either?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> As far as being grateful for a job, there
    >>>>>>> is that of course. But you need to be
    >>>>>>> careful when you state that certain
    >>>>>>> practices are okay simply because you do
    >>>>>>> have a position. Sure, one week is not a
    >>>>>>> big deal, but could it be extended at any
    >>>>>>> time? How much free time are you willing to
    >>>>>>> put in, in order to have a job? And I'm not
    >>>>>>> talking about lesson planning or any
    >>>>>>> classroom organization you do after
    >>>>>>> contracted hours. I know people in other
    >>>>>>> professions who spend a lot of after hours
    >>>>>>> time for their jobs as well. I'm referring
    >>>>>>> to possibly teaching the last month for
    >>>>>>> free because the state budget has run out
    >>>>>>> of money (no rumors, just a hypothetical).
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> When teachers value their time, perhaps
    >>>>>>> others will start to as well.
    >>>>


    Share This Post | Report This Post
    Next Post >>

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • WONDERING, 6/29/09, by Mary.
  • Re: WONDERING, 6/29/09, by sorry.
  • Re: WONDERING, 6/30/09, by Jake.
  • Re: WONDERING, 6/30/09, by What about the extra week of work?.
  • Re: WONDERING, 6/30/09, by ML.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/01/09, by why complain so much.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/02/09, by Is the complainer representative?.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/02/09, by Nothing I have received so far.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/02/09, by read the contract.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/02/09, by huh.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/02/09, by ML.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/02/09, by they told me about it.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/03/09, by ok then....
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/03/09, by No .
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/03/09, by NO SIGNING BONUS.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/04/09, by You know nothing about me.
  • Re: WONDERING, 7/26/09, by Cut the bull.

     
     

You are on the NV CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
Click here
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lesson Plans Contacts PR Advertise
  © 1996 - 2009. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.