Re: Wow

I'm sorry, I should clarify. I came across a thread about National
Boards, and the debate over funding the stipend. I thought my post
was going to be associated with that particular thread. Most of
the comments were terribly written and oftentimes ridiculous in
concept. If you don't know the difference between "there"
and "their", or feel that the drinking water in SC contributes to
poor test scores, you certainly can't claim to be a top-notch
educator who deserves a 30% raise.

On 11/10/09, Angie wrote:
> I agree with both of you. I only returned to look for something
> nice to get a Student Teacher.
>
> I quit visiting the chatboard years ago because I could not
> believe how mean some of the posters were. It doesn't appear that
> it has changed.
>
> Have A Great Year!
>
> On 11/10/09, Too right wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> As a teacher myself, I heartily concur! Higher wages for
>> teachers would allow for the recruitment of quality individuals
>> to go into the profession. As it stands now, one generally
>> gets what one pays for...
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> On 11/10/09, Dan wrote:
>>> I stumbled across this thread by accident. I couldn't stop
>>> reading!! I couldn't believe how illogical most posts
>>> were, and the grammatical and spelling errors committed
>>> by...teachers! Very sad. Good luck keeping that NB money
>>> though. That's the important thing, right.