Re: Wow

On 11/10/09, Dan wrote:
> I'm sorry, I should clarify. I came across a thread about National
> Boards, and the debate over funding the stipend. I thought my post
> was going to be associated with that particular thread. Most of
> the comments were terribly written and oftentimes ridiculous in
> concept. If you don't know the difference between "there"
> and "their", or feel that the drinking water in SC contributes to
> poor test scores, you certainly can't claim to be a top-notch
> educator who deserves a 30% raise.
>
>
> On 11/10/09, Angie wrote:
>> I agree with both of you. I only returned to look for something
>> nice to get a Student Teacher.
>>
>> I quit visiting the chatboard years ago because I could not
>> believe how mean some of the posters were. It doesn't appear that
>> it has changed.
>>
>> Have A Great Year!
>>
>> On 11/10/09, Too right wrote:
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> As a teacher myself, I heartily concur! Higher wages for
>>> teachers would allow for the recruitment of quality individuals
>>> to go into the profession. As it stands now, one generally
>>> gets what one pays for...
>>>
>>> Ken
>>>
>>> On 11/10/09, Dan wrote:
>>>> I stumbled across this thread by accident. I couldn't stop
>>>> reading!! I couldn't believe how illogical most posts
>>>> were, and the grammatical and spelling errors committed
>>>> by...teachers! Very sad. Good luck keeping that NB money
>>>> though. That's the important thing, right.