On 7/02/09, Science teacher wrote:
> Yet you accept the IPCC report that was a ragtag collection of
> snippets from research studies. Who put the collection together?
> Scientists? Professionals in climate science? No, government
> bureaucrats with an agenda. Who do listen too for your climate info?
> Al Gore --a journalist/ theology major! Ever see the interview of
> the scientists who asked their names be removed from the IPCC report
> because the lackeys writing the report distorted and misused their
> data to support the conclusions that were predetermined?
>
> Thousands of scientists, experts in their fields, have spoken out
> against global warming as presented by the Democratic party. More
> and more continue to speak out. Some of them are former rabid global
> warming proponents, others are scientists whose work was nitpicked to
> fit Al Gores get-rich-quick/ seize power scheme. Countries that have
> passed cap and trade are starting to repeal these idiotic economy
> busters.
>
> The anti-science rhetoric is this blind allegiance we are supposed to
> swear to the global warming church. Science is based on analysis of
> results, duplication of experiments, healthy skepticism, debate.
> Consensus in science is a lie, nothing more than an attempt to
> squelch the process of science.
>
> Why do the democrats want the cap and trade passed so fast? More and
> more people are realizing Al Gores lies? Why do they not want the
> elected officials to have time to read the bill before voting?

You didn't address anything that I posted and proceeded to rant about
eve more wild conspiracy theories. Way to go teabagger! We want more
about this "global warming church."

Share This Post | Report This Post

Next Post >>

Posts on this thread, including this one