Common Core is the big game now, material content is written now
for CC standards since thats the driving factor in sales.
As long as the material isnt labeled common core, there is nothing
illegal about the scope of the content being correlated to CC.
Common Core is just a name for standards just as TEKS are a name
for standards, those standards pretty much overlap.
On 8/30/14, and Pearson does wrote:
> common core, too? Is that right? So much of what are new
> textbooks have is common core?
>
> On 8/29/14, 1administrator wrote:
>> TEA only jumps when Pearson say how high! Pearson prepares
>> the test. Pearson delivers and accounts for the test! Pearson
>> grades the test! Pearson prepares the results for
>> publication! TEA does nothing without Pearson's directions.
>>
>> On 8/27/14, to 1 administrator wrote:
>>> Can you explain what you mean when you say Pearson already
>>> owns TEA? I would like to understand your observation on
>>> that.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/27/14, 1administrator wrote:
>>>> PsyGuy- I have a question. I am not trying to start an
>>>> argument, but on C-scope, Curriculum, and such but why
>>>> can't Pearson or textbook publisher write a textbook that
>>>> covers the TEKS required. We are purchasing textbooks,
>>>> hardcopy or online anyway. Just a random thought that
>>>> crossed my mind. With the number of purchases, the
>>>> publishers should be able to produce the needed books.(I
>>>> only mentioned Pearson because they already own TEA!) Let
>>>> me hear what you think!
>>>>
>>>> On 8/26/14, PsyGuy wrote:
>>>>> Typical tea party rhetoric. If its not about god, guns,
>>>>> taxes
>>>> or
>>>>> profits, its anti-american and anti-family.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/17/14, Hope wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/17/14, c-scope is being raised from the dead...
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I heard that the Texas Resource System is c-scope
>>>>>>> revised. Is this true?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, but supposedly without the controversial lessons
>>>>>> that were anti-American, anti-family, etc. The region
>>>>>> service centers are making a killing off this. They're
>>>>>> not about to let it die. It's their cash cow. Forget
>>>>>> about it being full of numerous errors. Teachers aren't
>>>>>> supposed to be smart enough to see that, or stupid
>>>>>> enough to point it out to anyone in authority.
Posts on this thread, including this one