Re: PDAS Stuff
    Posted by: PsyGuy on 2/17/15
    () Comments

    Just because your not on the hit list now, doesnt mean you wont be,
    and its much harder to compile a case for non-renewal when the
    previous evaluations show no deficiencies.

    This wasnt an actual behavior management issue, the principal said
    she needs to tweak her lesson to flow a little better. Thats not
    below deficient.

    On 2/15/15, my 2 wrote:
    > I disagree with the last post. When you are on an admin's "hit
    > list" they don't ding you in one area. They let you know it by
    > chronic walk throughs and calling you into their office over petty
    > stuff. What I think you should do is listen to the feedback with
    > an open heart. Perhaps the discipline in your room wasn't stellar
    > the day you did the evaluation lesson. Ask co-workers for some
    > tips. If your discipline is really, really strong, invite your
    > evaluator back into your room and ask them to observe that area in
    > the hopes you can talk them into extra points for discipline on
    > your final evaluation. Be proactive. Grow from the experience.
    > Don't just assume they are gunning for you. Sometimes you get an
    > admin who is a real jerk, but most are willing to work with you.
    > Explain the strengths of the classroom management system that you
    > have and try to get this matter cleared up. Let your actions speak
    > to the fact you are a professional who is willing to accept
    > constructive feedback and to improve. That is my advice.
    >
    >
    > On 2/14/15, Sovetis wrote:
    >> Thanks. That's both good and annoying news. It's annoying
    >> that they want to keep you feeling insecure. I would work
    >> just as hard even if all domains were proficient.
    >>
    >> On 2/14/15, PsyGuy wrote:
    >>> Not really, admins like to ding everyone on something, that
    >>> way if they have a problem later, you wont be able to show
    >>> up with a perfect PDAS and say how can I be "bad" when my
    >>> reviews are all perfect and stellar. The admin is just
    >>> giving herself an out if she needs too at some later time
    >>> in the future.
    >>> "Tweaks" should not result in below proficient, you only
    >>> need to be proficient 90% of the time to be proficient.
    >>> That means 10% of the time you can be absolutely horrible.
    >>>
    >>> The debate team means nothing.
    >>>
    >>> On 2/13/15, Sovetis wrote:
    >>>> I just got my observation results. I'm proficient in
    >>>> every category & domain except for the one for classroom
    >>>> management. I received three below expectations in that
    >>>> category which gave me an 18. I think 20 would make me
    >>>> proficient. She said my lesson was solid, but I needed to
    >>>> tweak a few things to make it run more smoothly. All of
    >>>> my walkthroughs were 3s, 4s, and 5s.
    >>>>
    >>>> Also, they just asked me to take over the debate team.
    >>>>
    >>>> Do I have anything to worry about? I hate having that one
    >>>> category below expectations.
    >>>>


    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • PDAS Stuff, 2/13/15, by Sovetis.
  • Re: PDAS Stuff, 2/14/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: PDAS Stuff, 2/14/15, by Sovetis.
  • Re: PDAS Stuff, 2/15/15, by my 2.
  • Re: PDAS Stuff, 2/16/15, by Formeradmin.
  • Re: PDAS Stuff, 2/17/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: PDAS Stuff, 2/17/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 4/18/15, by Aeiou.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 4/21/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 4/24/15, by 27k BS.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 4/27/15, by BS bs.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/01/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/13/15, by 27K No Way!.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/14/15, by anon.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/16/15, by Payscale differ.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/16/15, by ash.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/17/15, by 27k.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/18/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/18/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/18/15, by Dave.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/18/15, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/19/15, by anon.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/19/15, by 27k.
  • Re: 27,000 a year?, 5/20/15, by PsyGuy.