Effective Teaching...
by Harry and Rosemary Wong |
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This article was printed from Teachers.Net Gazette, located at https://teachers.net. ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Training Teachers to Be Effective
|
Notice the words “effectively trained.” That’s what the Flowing Wells School District has been doing with its new teachers for over 25 years. And now the government’s education initiative, Race to the Top, suddenly realizes that it’s effective teachers that are the key to improving student learning and achievement.
Instead of teaching teachers how to be effective and how to improve student learning and achievement, the history of education has shown that we have spent at least 75 years jumping from one fad or ideology to another, while recycling the same programs year after year, decade after decade.
Tucson is the Spring Training home of the Arizona Diamondbacks baseball team along with 14 other professional teams that bask in the sunshine to train and get ready for the season ahead.
Yet, that’s exactly what many schools and school districts do to the new teachers that are hired and completely ignore the research that overwhelming states:
One-on-one mentoring does not improve student learning.
Over one million new teachers received mentoring between 1993 through 2003, but we know little about the magnitude of the benefits they have received or how the impact of mentoring varied across different types of programs. Mentoring has become an extremely popular policy for improving the retention and performance of new teachers, but we know little about its effects on teacher and student outcomes. Despite the popularity of mentoring, little is known about its impact on employee turnover and skill acquisition. Nearly all published and unpublished evaluations of mentoring programs have used research methodologies that fall short of providing credible estimates of the causal impacts of mentoring. Jonah Rockoff, “Does Mentoring Reduce Turnover and Improve Skills of New Employees? Evidence from Teachers in New York City.” NBER Working Paper, February, 2008. |
Click here for more research on the efficacy of mentoring.
Successful Induction Programs
Successful new teacher induction programs are organized the same as baseball training camps and all other new employee training programs found in successful businesses.
It should be self-evident that to simply give a new teacher a mentor will not produce an effective teacher. According to Richard Ingersoll, a good induction program has seven components.
Unfortunately, districts continue to pour millions of dollars into one-on-one mentoring programs. The mentoring program at each school and even between each mentor varies and there is absolutely no consistency.
What works in producing effective teachers is an induction process designed to train and acculturate new teachers and teachers new to the district. The process emphasizes the academic standards, vision, and culture of the district.
The induction process is comprehensive, coherent, and sustained.
The goal of an induction program is to produce teachers who can
Induction Focuses on the District’s Vision
Our introduction to the concept of induction began when we visited the Flowing Wells School District in Tucson, Arizona, in the early 80s. It was a phenomenally successful school district even though the students came from the challenging side of Tucson. Through the years, the Flowing Wells Schools have produced more award-winning teachers than any other school district in Arizona.
Flowing Wells does this with a well-organized, eight-year, new teacher induction process that takes a beginning teacher through incremental stages, from novice, competent, and proficient to expert, which then seamlessly flows into a life-long professional development program they call an Institute for Teacher Renewal and Growth.
Click here to read the details of their eight-year induction process.
The Flowing Wells Induction Program emphasizes five critical attributes that are the cornerstones of the district’s vision:
Suffice to say, the Flowing Wells District induction program is able to achieve these outcomes:
Building Human Capacity
The greatest asset of a school district is its teachers. As a school district, Flowing Wells knows to train and teach its teachers to perform at their highest capacity. For a quarter of a century, Flowing Wells has been improving the instructional practices of its teachers and creating effective schools. It seems logical and simple, but the impact it produces is astounding.
The success of the Flowing Wells induction program speaks a clear message to any school district—to any country’s government—training, supporting, and retaining highly qualified teachers is a must. Induction is a must!
Programs do not produce student achievement; teachers produce student achievement. The “Race to the Top” initiative is misnamed. Being the best for students is not a race. A race implies someone will win and the rest will be forgotten. At Flowing Wells, all of its teachers are winners. They train and nurture their teachers to “Be at the Top.” Every moment, every day for teachers is an opportunity to grow and learn and be at the top of their profession—for children.
Effective teachers—children deserve nothing less.