|
|

 |
|




|
| Teachers.Net Gazette Vol.5 No.12 |
December 2008 |
Advertisement
 |
The Teachers.Net Gazette is a collaborative project
published by the Teachers.Net community |
Editor in Chief: Kathleen Alape Carpenter
Layout Editor: Mary Miehl

Cover Story by Bill Page

Effective Teaching by Harry & Rosemary Wong

Contributors this month: Sue Gruber, Kioni Carter, Marvin Marshall, , Marjan Glavac, Todd R. Nelson, Hal Portner, Leah Davies, Barbara Pressman, Tim Newlin, Bill Page, James Wayne, Hank Kellner, Magoo, Bruce J. Gevirtzman, Barb Stutesman, Ron Victoria, Tony Wagner, Alan Haskvitz,Mrs. Mimi, and YENDOR.

Submissions: click for Submission Guidelines

Advertising: contact Bob Reap
|

Subscribe for free home delivery
|
|
Archive
|
Biography
|
Resources
|
Discussion


At-Risk Students: A Point of Viewing

“At-Risk Students: Children who are expected to fail because teachers cannot motivate, control, teach, or interest them using traditional methods and prescribed curriculum.” ~ At-Risk Students: Understanding Their Defensive Ploys - Bill Page
 |
|
A Position Paper by Bill Page
Regular contributor to the Gazette
December 1, 2008

“A point-of-view is how one views something; a point-of-viewing is where one stands while s/he is viewing something. I have been, (and still am), at-risk. I have stood where the troublemakers stood. I have seen the classroom from the bottom end. I have suffered failure and embarrassment. I have felt classroom discrimination, hostility, and injustice. I didn’t like it. It hurt. Now, here’s my point of viewing:”
Nothing is more frustrating for teachers than the daunting task of teaching kids who can’t, don’t, or won’t even try to learn, cooperate, follow procedures, or behave. Currently failing students and those at risk of failing are education’s number one problem. Furthermore, the collateral damage of failure in the form of dropouts, truants, illiterates, delinquents, and criminals is a national shame, an economical waste, and an educational travesty. And, the “at-risk problem” is equally egregious for students, parents, administrators, and society.
Twenty-five percent of all students may be at risk of failure. And, fifteen percent of all students qualify as chronically failing and repeating grades, making them “at-certain” of failure and of dropping out. Traditional remediation strategies and alternative programs for improving achievement of at-risk students have been notoriously ineffective, especially with the hardcore group at the “bottom” or with middle and secondary students who may have endured years of failure, bad behavior, and bad attitudes. Students who have been retained in grade usually survive school only long enough to reach dropout age, while many marginalized students go through the motions of schooling with no measurable learning achievement.
Remedial Procedures Have Not Worked for At-Risk Students
Traditional remedial teaching methods have emphasized controlling and modifying the students’ misbehavior rather than changing failed school policies, examining underlying causes, and acknowledging the ineffective behavior, attitude, and relationship of well-meaning teachers. Student behavior is a manifestation of beliefs, attitudes, emotions, and experiences. Reasons for misbehavior are internal and cannot be manipulated from outside by teachers or by parents. Use of punishment as a remedy treats the symptoms not the causes of misbehavior. Predictably, the misbehavior accelerates to retaliation measures such as vandalism, hostility, apathy, and rebellion creating even greater problems.
Beliefs and perceptions must be examined and altered by students so they can change their own behavior. Behavior modifications can be made only by the students themselves. But, since the causal factors that are currently driving them are the same ones necessary for making a change, students cannot be expected to initiate that change on their own. Students need a responsible adult to intercede and advise, but they are reluctant to take advice or counsel from anyone they don’t trust, they don’t like, or who has already failed to help them. Since these problem students see teachers on a daily basis, it is imperative that a good student-teacher relationship be established before students can be helped to improve and begin to take responsibility for their behavior and success.
Achievement Is the Function of Choice and Commitment
Schools cannot change student behavior by compulsion, exhortation, coercion, cajoling, reward, or punishment. They’ve been trying for 100 years! Individual student achievement is the function of choice and commitment; it is never the result of coercion. If sufficiently powerful, coercion can cause a degree of compliance or perhaps cause the student to behave as though complying; but, as schools discovered long ago, coercion can also cause resistance, resentment, hostility, defiance, passive aggression, violence, subversion, vandalism, hopelessness, passivity, and a full range of notorious, disruptive and undesirable behaviors by students at-risk.
At-risk students need help seeing themselves in new and different ways, and with renewed hope and possibilities. If they perceive themselves differently, they will behave differently. I am the only one who can change me and only students can change themselves. Change must emanate from inside each individual. Perception cannot be manipulated from the outside. Through a caring relationship with mutual trust and respect, teachers can help students change their perceptions by facilitating a willingness and freedom to examine, question, compare, and consider other possibilities. Until students see themselves as capable, or until the have the desire to change, they cannot acquire the study and learning skills by which they can ultimately improve their behavior and academic achievement.
Article continued on next page

» More Gazette articles...


Discussion For This Article:
At-Risk Students: A Point of Viewing - page 1
Bill Page (December 2008 Gazette)
- Cheap viagra, 11/20/09, by Pharmk702.
- Cheap viagra, 11/08/09, by Pharmc624.
- Cheap viagra, 11/02/09, by Pharmb694.
- Cheap viagra, 10/22/09, by Pharma897.
- Cheap viagra, 10/16/09, by Pharmk341.
- vapor cfcs population suggests combined, 10/09/09, by spensermir.
- ago cause business, 9/26/09, by gardeniake.
- Cheap viagra, 9/26/09, by Pharmg849.
- Cheap viagra, 9/26/09, by Pharme361.
- precipitation exempt, 9/18/09, by clevebonne.

See All Comments
|
Add Your Comment

|

About Bill Page ...

Bill Page, a farm boy, graduated from a one-room school. He forged a career in the classroom teaching middle school “troublemakers.” For the past 26 years, in addition to his classroom duties, he has taught teachers across the nation to teach the lowest achieving students successfully with his proven premise, “Failure is the choice and fault of schools, not the students.”
Bill Page is a classroom teacher. For 46 years, he has patrolled the halls, responded to the bells, and struggled with innovations. He has had his share of lunchroom duty, bus duty, and playground duty. For the past four years, Bill, who is now in his 50th year as a teacher, is also a full time writer. His book, At-Risk Students is available on Abebooks, Amazon, R.D. Dunn Publishing, and on Bill’s web site: http://www.teacherteacher.com/
In At-Risk Students, Page discusses problems facing failing students, “who can’t, don’t and won’t learn or cooperate.” “The solution,” he states, “is for teachers to recognize and accept student misbehavior as defense mechanisms used to hide embarrassment and incompetence, and to deal with causes rather than symptoms. By entering into a democratic, participatory relationship, where students assume responsibility for their own learning.” Through 30 vignettes, the book helps teachers see failing students through his eyes as a fellow teacher, whose classroom success with at-risk students made him a premier teacher-speaker in school districts across America.
|

Bill Page Articles on Teachers.Net...
- Parents Are Recruits, Teachers Are Responsible, Kids Are Victims, and Schools Are Culpable For At-Risk Problems (June 2009)
- Teaching Is... (May 2009)
- At Risk Students: Victims of Miseducation and Failure (Apr. 2009)
- Fifty Years of Teaching (Mar. 2009)
- Teacher Study Groups: Taking the “Risk” out of “At-Risk” (Feb. 2009)
- Thoughts on the Use of Failure as a Teaching Technique (Jan. 2009)
- At-Risk Students: A Point of Viewing (Dec. 2008)
- Labels Are For the Jelly Jar (Nov. 2008)
- Curriculum Happens (Oct. 2008)
- Notes And Quotes From My Summer Reading (Sept. 2008)
- Responsibility Equals Participation (Aug. 2008)
- When Is Student Failure The Teacher’s Fault (July 2008)
- A Great Model Of Differentiation (June 2008)
- Two Teachers, Two Philosophies, One Result (May 2008)
- The Silenced Majority (April 2008)
- Your Students Are Watching, Listening, and Learning (Mar 2008)
- Bureaucrat's Field of Dreams: If You Test Them They Will Learn -- A Rousing, Rip-Roaring,Raving Rant (Apr 2003)
- If We Want… (Jan 2003)
- We Get What We Get (Dec 2002)
- A Remarkable Program For At-Risk, Middle Level Students (Dec 2002)
- Teacher Classroom Control Means Student Self-Control (Nov 2002)
- Relational Discipline (Sep 2002)
- Teachers Are Individuals Too (Sep 2002)
- Classroom Rules??? (Aug 2002)
- Learning Your Students' Names: Fun, Fast, Easy and Important (Aug 2002)
- Making 2002-2003 The Best Year Ever (Aug 2002)
- Using The Summer To Improve Your Teaching (July 2002)
- What I Know I Know (July 2002)
- We Have Achieved Education For All...Now We Seek Education for Each (June 2002)
- Improving Classroom Grading Procedures (May 2002)
- Teaching: An Awesome Responsibility (May 2002)
- The Teacher is the Difference (May 2002)
- Take a Seat at the Bottom of the Class (Apr 2002)
- Swinging on the Education Pendulum (Mar 2002)
- Remediation Doesn't Work (Feb 2002)
- Teaching Is... (Jan 2002)
|
|
Related Resources & Discussions on Teachers.Net...
|
|
|
|