|
|

Re: Dibels reading assess.
Posted by Ms. Altman on 11/22/06
I loathe Dibels. In one of my graduate courses for special education I had a professor that went on and one about great DIBELS is...The only thing great about DIBELS is that it is free. On 9/23/06, Kathy wrote: > YIKES!!! It frightens me that an experience educator thinks that DIBELS is > measuring the reading process. The reading process is a complex process that > we have only begun to understand. I am concerned about U.S. Department of > Education findings that many programs and assessments have been seen as "Not > scientifically researched" based on a panel of people who were more interested > in profit than helping our children learn to read in the most effective and > efficient way. There is information that DIBELS does not do as much as it > claims. I urge any teachers!!! Stand up, be courageous. We are the ones in the > trenches. We are the experts. Why do we continually let others tell us what > is best for our children? We know them best. I hope that we have moved beyond > the whole language vs. phonics war. When our gut tells us that something isn't > quite right we need to shout loudly and clearly. We should be the strongest > advocates for our children. > > > > > > On 9/03/06, Ginny wrote: >> We have been trained to believe that DIBELS is an effective way to assess >> student reading skills. I have been reading "The Truth About DIBELS" by >> Kenneth S. Goodman and am concerned that I have been only told one side of >> the story by my state leaders and U of O. I don't want to implement DIBELS >> without being very sure that the time, money to be spent equals valid >> information. I am also concerned about the affects Dr. Goodman state about >> how the timed testing is not valid in 5-7 year olds and the stress it places >> on the children. >> >> I would appreciate anyone who has information that will help me make a >> determination. Is this a "Whole Language" vs. "Phonics" war where we are >> talking about personal opinons or is it a real. >> >> Thank your for your thoughts. >> >> >> On 4/04/06, Margaret Turner wrote: >>> On 3/04/06, Kathy wrote: >>>> I am an administrator looking at better ways to diagnose reading >>>> difficulties for our special education children in the elementary >>>> grades. We currently use observation survy in the early grades and >>>> frankly, it is hit and miss for children thereafter relative to specific >>>> skills. This leaves the inclusion class teachers struggling to teach >>>> without a clear understanding of what needs to be supported, etc. >>>> Anything you can tell me would help inform our team - thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/11/06, Kim wrote: >>>>> Maureen, We are also considering DIBELS as an assessment tool. I >>>>> would be very interested in reading your paper. Please e-mail it to >>>>> me. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Kim >>>>> >>>>> On 12/08/05, Maureen wrote: >>>>>> On 7/14/05, Cheryle wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/14/05, A wrote: >>>>>>>> I am looking at DIBELS as a potential tool to use in my first >>>>>>>> grade classroom after attending a fluency PD this summer. The >>>>>>>> teacher leading the session, and several of the teachers in the >>>>>>>> session really liked this assessment, which is required for the >>>>>>>> Kentucky Reading First schools. (My school is not a Reading >>>>>>>> First school.) We are required to administer the DRA, and I >>>>>>>> think I will try DIBELS this year too. It is available free of >>>>>>>> charge from the DIBELS website. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am interested in any feedback from folks who have used this >>>>>>>> assessment - pro and con. Please don't spare me your real >>>>>>>> opinion just because I am thinking of using it. I really want to >>>>>>>> know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This past year was the first that we used DIBELS in our district. >>>>>>> It has been mandated by the state. It can be time consuming, >>>>>>> especially in the grades K-2. Third grade only has the oral reading >>>>>>> fluency test. I used it to help me pinpoint areas where particular >>>>>>> children needed help. However, my co=workers and I found faults >>>>>>> with it as well. I would recommend going to the University of >>>>>>> Oregon website (Official DIBELS Homepage. >>>>>>> http://dibels.uoregon.edu/) and read the technical papers listed >>>>>>> there, especially Technical Report #10 by Good and Kaminsky. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My curiosity was aroused when we found that students followed a >>>>>>> pattern of pass-fail-pass-fail and so on. TR #10 explains how the >>>>>>> creators of DIBELS leveled the passages. It makes no sense to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For one of my Master's classes I wrote a paper on my findings in my >>>>>>> classroom. I would be glad to email it to you if you are interested >>>>>>> in reading it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am studying for the National Boards. I would love to read the >>>>> paper >>>>>> you wrote on it. Thanks, >>>>>> Maureen >>> >>> Hi, I am Margaret Turner. I'm a reading coach in Florida. We've been >>> using the DIBELS Assessment for about 5 years now. We find it to be >>> invaluable in predicting success and failure in reading. What we had to >>> learn was that the dibels is assessing the reading process itself. The >>> reading process develops the way the dibels assesses; phonemic and >>> phonological awareness,the alphabetic principle, phonics, and finally oral >>> reading fluency. If we can help the children develop the skills in each >>> one of those categories, the goal of reading fluency will happen. From >>> there, our real goal, comprehension will occur. It's a process. The >>> children can't skip any or the processes and be successful readers. The >>> DIBELS allows us to see where they are in the process and address that >>> area of weakness. Usually, it works very well. >>> Sometimes we have students that can't seem to get it no matter what you do. >>> I'm looking for an assessment for those students.
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Dibels reading assess., 2/25/04, by Nancy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 2/29/04, by Amy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 5/15/04, by Rachel.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 6/05/04, by ellie.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 7/03/04, by Rose-Ann McKernan.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 3/25/05, by Cheryle.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 3/25/05, by Cheryle.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 7/14/05, by A.
- Re: To A:Dibels reading assess., 7/14/05, by kteacher271.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 7/14/05, by Cheryle.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 10/26/05, by Jeff.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 10/31/05, by Monica.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 11/27/05, by Mary Kay Starkey.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 12/08/05, by Maureen.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 12/08/05, by Maureen.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 1/11/06, by Kim.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 2/04/06, by Pearl.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 2/08/06, by Darlene.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 2/11/06, by been there, done that.
- Re: Dibels a toothpick!, 2/11/06, by Nancy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 3/04/06, by Kathy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 4/04/06, by Margaret Turner.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 4/06/06, by Nancy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 6/28/06, by Kathy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 7/06/06, by Robin.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 9/03/06, by Ginny.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 9/03/06, by Ginny.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 9/10/06, by Parent1115.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 9/23/06, by Kathy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 9/23/06, by Kathy.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 11/02/06, by Sandi.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 11/22/06, by Ms. Altman.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 12/03/06, by Jane Bain.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 1/01/07, by plcarlson.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 1/30/07, by Kristin.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 5/15/07, by Thomas Davis.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 5/30/07, by a reading teacher.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 5/30/07, by a reading teacher.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 6/02/07, by k teacher.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 3/10/08, by JULIE.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 3/10/08, by julie.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 3/11/08, by capitalize I.
- Re: Dibels reading assess., 4/17/08, by Michelle.
|