SUBMIT POST ALL POSTS TOP POSTS
Share | Print | Report Post Building Blocks Literacy Chatboard
Search Teachers.Net
Advanced
Quick Links: Set
Hot Now...
September 2008 Gazette
Teacher Tech Center
The Lesson Bank
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Lesson Bank
Teacher Mailrings
Project Center
Classified Ads
Live Chat & Meetings
Select by
State/Region
Grade Level
Curriculum
Interest Group
Teaching Method
Special Topics
Technology
Languages
Hot Topics
Career Center
Distance Learning
Fundraising
Tutoring Center
Teacher's Bookshelf
Free Printables
Classroom Photos
Meeting Archive
Teaching Articles
Library
Web Tools
Webring
Search
Advertise
 

Re: Dibels reading assess.
Posted by Ms. Altman on 11/22/06

    I loathe Dibels. In one of my graduate courses for special education I had a
    professor that went on and one about great DIBELS is...The only thing great about
    DIBELS is that it is free.


    On 9/23/06, Kathy wrote:
    > YIKES!!! It frightens me that an experience educator thinks that DIBELS is
    > measuring the reading process. The reading process is a complex process that
    > we have only begun to understand. I am concerned about U.S. Department of
    > Education findings that many programs and assessments have been seen as "Not
    > scientifically researched" based on a panel of people who were more interested
    > in profit than helping our children learn to read in the most effective and
    > efficient way. There is information that DIBELS does not do as much as it
    > claims. I urge any teachers!!! Stand up, be courageous. We are the ones in the
    > trenches. We are the experts. Why do we continually let others tell us what
    > is best for our children? We know them best. I hope that we have moved beyond
    > the whole language vs. phonics war. When our gut tells us that something isn't
    > quite right we need to shout loudly and clearly. We should be the strongest
    > advocates for our children.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 9/03/06, Ginny wrote:
    >> We have been trained to believe that DIBELS is an effective way to assess
    >> student reading skills. I have been reading "The Truth About DIBELS" by
    >> Kenneth S. Goodman and am concerned that I have been only told one side of
    >> the story by my state leaders and U of O. I don't want to implement DIBELS
    >> without being very sure that the time, money to be spent equals valid
    >> information. I am also concerned about the affects Dr. Goodman state about
    >> how the timed testing is not valid in 5-7 year olds and the stress it places
    >> on the children.
    >>
    >> I would appreciate anyone who has information that will help me make a
    >> determination. Is this a "Whole Language" vs. "Phonics" war where we are
    >> talking about personal opinons or is it a real.
    >>
    >> Thank your for your thoughts.
    >>
    >>
    >> On 4/04/06, Margaret Turner wrote:
    >>> On 3/04/06, Kathy wrote:
    >>>> I am an administrator looking at better ways to diagnose reading
    >>>> difficulties for our special education children in the elementary
    >>>> grades. We currently use observation survy in the early grades and
    >>>> frankly, it is hit and miss for children thereafter relative to specific
    >>>> skills. This leaves the inclusion class teachers struggling to teach
    >>>> without a clear understanding of what needs to be supported, etc.
    >>>> Anything you can tell me would help inform our team - thanks!
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 1/11/06, Kim wrote:
    >>>>> Maureen, We are also considering DIBELS as an assessment tool. I
    >>>>> would be very interested in reading your paper. Please e-mail it to
    >>>>> me.
    >>>>> Thanks,
    >>>>> Kim
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 12/08/05, Maureen wrote:
    >>>>>> On 7/14/05, Cheryle wrote:
    >>>>>>> On 7/14/05, A wrote:
    >>>>>>>> I am looking at DIBELS as a potential tool to use in my first
    >>>>>>>> grade classroom after attending a fluency PD this summer. The
    >>>>>>>> teacher leading the session, and several of the teachers in the
    >>>>>>>> session really liked this assessment, which is required for the
    >>>>>>>> Kentucky Reading First schools. (My school is not a Reading
    >>>>>>>> First school.) We are required to administer the DRA, and I
    >>>>>>>> think I will try DIBELS this year too. It is available free of
    >>>>>>>> charge from the DIBELS website.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> I am interested in any feedback from folks who have used this
    >>>>>>>> assessment - pro and con. Please don't spare me your real
    >>>>>>>> opinion just because I am thinking of using it. I really want to
    >>>>>>>> know.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Thanks!
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> This past year was the first that we used DIBELS in our district.
    >>>>>>> It has been mandated by the state. It can be time consuming,
    >>>>>>> especially in the grades K-2. Third grade only has the oral reading
    >>>>>>> fluency test. I used it to help me pinpoint areas where particular
    >>>>>>> children needed help. However, my co=workers and I found faults
    >>>>>>> with it as well. I would recommend going to the University of
    >>>>>>> Oregon website (Official DIBELS Homepage.
    >>>>>>> http://dibels.uoregon.edu/) and read the technical papers listed
    >>>>>>> there, especially Technical Report #10 by Good and Kaminsky.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> My curiosity was aroused when we found that students followed a
    >>>>>>> pattern of pass-fail-pass-fail and so on. TR #10 explains how the
    >>>>>>> creators of DIBELS leveled the passages. It makes no sense to me.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> For one of my Master's classes I wrote a paper on my findings in my
    >>>>>>> classroom. I would be glad to email it to you if you are interested
    >>>>>>> in reading it.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> I am studying for the National Boards. I would love to read the
    >>>>> paper
    >>>>>> you wrote on it. Thanks,
    >>>>>> Maureen
    >>>
    >>> Hi, I am Margaret Turner. I'm a reading coach in Florida. We've been
    >>> using the DIBELS Assessment for about 5 years now. We find it to be
    >>> invaluable in predicting success and failure in reading. What we had to
    >>> learn was that the dibels is assessing the reading process itself. The
    >>> reading process develops the way the dibels assesses; phonemic and
    >>> phonological awareness,the alphabetic principle, phonics, and finally oral
    >>> reading fluency. If we can help the children develop the skills in each
    >>> one of those categories, the goal of reading fluency will happen. From
    >>> there, our real goal, comprehension will occur. It's a process. The
    >>> children can't skip any or the processes and be successful readers. The
    >>> DIBELS allows us to see where they are in the process and address that
    >>> area of weakness. Usually, it works very well.
    >>> Sometimes we have students that can't seem to get it no matter what you do.
    >>> I'm looking for an assessment for those students.

     
     

You are on the BUILDINGBLOCKS CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

Sponsors  

New Moms Wanted!
Join the community for new and expecting moms. Check out Maternityville.com Maternity Chat!

Free Lesson Plans
Thousands of lesson plans and curriculum ideas! teachers.net/lessons

Teaching Jobs
Thousands of teaching jobs and other jobs in education - visit jobs.teachers.net

Other Chatboards in this Category...

Check out the latest additions to the Lesson Bank...
 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
Click here
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lessons Contacts PR Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.