|
|

Re: Dibels reading assess.
Posted by Darlene on 2/08/06
On 2/04/06, Pearl wrote: > My daughter is a 4 yr old who has been reading 3 letter words with > short vowel sounds since she was 3 yrs and 7 months old. I taught > her at home. > > Here is my dilemma. She has a May birthday and does not qualify for > Kindergarten. (Should she be "Left Behind" due to her age?) She was > given the Dibels Standardized test at 4 years and 6 months and > tested at the first semester of kindergarten level. This test did > not include words for her to read, so I was really disappointed. > Her fluent reading ability was truly not tested. > > My daughter reads the directions on her homework and completes it > with little or no supervision. She is now reading words with > blends, two vowels, silent e words, 3 syllable words, etc. She will > voluntarily sit down and read a whole book (68 pages) such as Dr. > Seus' "Hop on Pop". She can count to 10 in Spanish and say a few > conversational words. She writes words without visual or auditory > prompts. She can write her first and last name, her sister's, etc. > She reads our emails, notes on the 'fridge, billboards, etc. > > Despite my detailed descriptions of her abilities, her principal > and the test administrator only responds with positive comments not > actions. "Oh, she's smart. Keep doing what you're doing. She'll do > fine next year in kindergarten." > Meanwhile, they want me to keep her in a Pre-K class that teaches > upper and lower case letters, numbers, colors, and shapes. She was > proficient in all of those areas before she was 3 years old. I > cannot believe their response to my child when this is a Title One > school who should have embraced and nurtured her abilities from day > one of Pre-K. She read for her teacher in the presence of the > principal on the first day of Pre-K. Yet they act as if they have > avid readers in Pre-K or even K. Out of the 50 kindergarten > students at this school, I do not think there is one who can read > as well as my child. Yet she is ignored. > > Perhaps I'll get Sylvan to administer a real reading test to her. I have very strong feelings about what you just described. I am the mother of six children, five biological and one we adopted as a toddler from Guatemala. My oldest started school reading on a fifth grade level and all through school was rarely taught anything new because she was working "at or above grade level". My second oldest made herself physically sick because she was so frustrated in 4th grade because they weren't allowed to work ahead until every single child understood. I pulled her from school and homeschooled her the next year, then when sixth grade started (junior high here) I felt there would be enough challenge and there was. So I put her back in the public school system. My third child, who not only was reading but also doing 2nd grade math before kindergarten, was basically ignored. I was told to take him to the zoo, on nature walks or the natural history museum and "leave the educating to us." My next child I pulled out of kindergarted right after Christmas. I had been promised and promised by her teacher that she would administer a reading test, which never happened. The day I pulled her out of school a kind teacher overheard my reason, the kindergarten teacher's response and asked to take my daughter to test her. She felt it would be helpful if I knew what level my daughter should be working at. She was reading on a strong 2nd grade possible early 3rd grade level. I home schooled her for two years, until the adoption of our son from Guatemala. Then I put her in school. By law they had to put her at her age/grade level. After one week I got a phone call and was told she needed to be moved up a grade level. I was concerned that there were some fundamentals that she was still struggling with, but found out those were covered at the end of the following grade in public school. So we moved her up a grade level and she was still in all the top groups. My fifth child, a boy, has been labeled profoundly gifted. The past year and a half he has scored in the hundred percentile of the Iowa standardized test and the one administered by our state. He is very frustrated sometimes, but has a wonderful teacher and a wonderful GATE (gifted and academically talented education)teacher who works with his teacher to keep him learning and stimulated. All of my children have benefited from this same teacher who prepares them well for life. Oh, and this child had no interest in letters or phonics until mid-way through kindergarten. I don't like the use of timed tests for kindergarteners! And I feel that most of my children would have benefited more from home school, had I known more then. The school administrators often forget that as taxpayers we pay them and they work for us. We have an administrator who won't let us have any say in who our child has as a teacher. If I don't get who I think is best for my child's needs, I will pull that child out and home school. It is not that difficult, and the problem of socialization is not a problem. Our children are involved in community sports and church activities, and quite frankly; after seeing what goes on in the schools sometimes I don't want that kind of socialization for my kids. Don't let the schools "dumb down" you child. If they would take these gifted children and move them along at the pace they are capeable of learning there wouldn't be the problems of other countries moving ahead of us technicalogically. But I am just a mom who obviously is too dumb to hold down a job because I stay at home with my kids.
|