SUBMIT POST ALL POSTS TOP POSTS
Share | Print | Report Post Building Blocks Literacy Chatboard
Search Teachers.Net
Advanced
Quick Links: Set
Hot Now...
September 2008 Gazette
Teacher Tech Center
The Lesson Bank
Most Popular
Set Your Quick Links
Chat Center
All Chatboards
Lesson Bank
Teacher Mailrings
Project Center
Classified Ads
Live Chat & Meetings
Select by
State/Region
Grade Level
Curriculum
Interest Group
Teaching Method
Special Topics
Technology
Languages
Hot Topics
Career Center
Distance Learning
Fundraising
Tutoring Center
Teacher's Bookshelf
Free Printables
Classroom Photos
Meeting Archive
Teaching Articles
Library
Web Tools
Webring
Search
Advertise
 

Re: Dibels a toothpick!
Posted by Nancy on 2/11/06

    Please, everyone remember that DIBELS assessments are only a toothpick!
    When you have fine readers in your classroom, meaning fluent and expressive
    and successful with breaking the code - WHY DIBEL them? Only to label them?
    For what??? The Dibels assessments CAN help you identify those in question
    of not having "broken the code" of word calling - but only that. I am observing
    too many times that DIBELS assessments plop all children into a "special" group
    and all are instructed the same because they have been labeled intensive.
    Please do not do this. Each child has specific reasons for struggling with the
    passage and we owe it to them to search for where their skills breakdown. The
    toothpick is perhaps a good initial tool - but then they deserve a really good
    detailed evaluation of what they need to work on. (Perhaps back to phonemic
    awareness, sight words, long vowel patterns, consonant digraphs or blends,
    multisyllable words?... etc...) or auditory discrimination. visual discriminatioin,
    vision development (not necessarily acuity but vision tracking, fixation, etc) All
    or only a couple of these factors may be impacting the problem with speed, but
    identify them and address them. Drilling, or placing them all into the same
    program/group does not address their specific problem.

    Secondly - how many of you have been teaching the comprehension skill within
    your core called monitor and clarify.... or question or .... reflect.... and suddenly
    you switch to preparing for, or testing for, speed with ORF? Does this bother
    you when at the same time you are pushing SPEED on them when reading their
    oral reading fluency passages you preach to monitor/clarify/reread for
    understanding/ reflection? It drives me MAD! I have wonderful reflective
    thinkers, terrific little readers who employ voice etc. but ... their ORF score is
    effected and the State says they don't read FAST ENOUGH! For shame, for
    shame they are trying to comprehend some of these weak passages!

    Lastly, I couldn't recommend more strongly that you go to the Dibels site (go to
    Google and type in DIBELS) then watch the left hand side for technical reports.
    It is most enlightening, especially the one detailing the readability of passages.
    I would have to say that the "Science" of calculating readability of passages has
    a LONG WAY to go! Type "readability" into Google and your head will swim
    too.

    We have all learned something from DIBELS.
    Nancy

     
     

You are on the BUILDINGBLOCKS CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

Sponsors  

New Moms Wanted!
Join the community for new and expecting moms. Check out Maternityville.com Maternity Chat!

Free Lesson Plans
Thousands of lesson plans and curriculum ideas! teachers.net/lessons

Teaching Jobs
Thousands of teaching jobs and other jobs in education - visit jobs.teachers.net

Other Chatboards in this Category...

Check out the latest additions to the Lesson Bank...
 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
Click here
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lessons Contacts PR Advertise
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.