SUBSCRIBE  |  PREFERENCES MY LINKS:              chat center STATES  |  GRADE LEVEL  |  SUBJECTS

Literature Teachers Chatboard

TOP POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST
Search Teachers.Net
Advanced

Advertise with Teachers.Net - Rate Card, Demographics, etc. Live Chat - Online Teacher Meetings and Workshops Harry Wong - Effective Teaching Teachers.Net Gazette - Articles by Teachers, For Teachers Mailrings - Teacher Email  Discussion Lists Teaching Jobs - Free Job Listings for Classroom Teachers Teacher Classified Ads K-12 Classroom Projects Lesson Plans - Over 4000 Free Lesson Plans Teacher Chatboards - Discussion Forums for Teachers Teacher Chat - Over 150 Teacher Discussion Topics
next post skip topic



Print | Share | Report Post

    Re: For Jessica
    Posted by L. Swilley on 8/21/08

    On 8/19/08, Jessica wrote:
    I
    > know that there have been some posts on here as to what
    > they [Lit Circles] are, and in reference to their
    efficacy....that is
    > not my question.

    [But isn't it. See your remarks below.]

    > Additionally, what do they do IN the lit circle? I know
    > that the idea is that they come up with questions and
    > discuss,

    *** but how can you be sure they are getting
    > everything they should out of it? And how can you be sure
    > that they are staying on topic and not wasting time??***

    [my emphasis].

    Answer: You can't. And consider:

    Students have come to us ignorant of the knowledge we
    want them to have. Lit circles presume that the students are
    able to provide for themselves that knowledge. (If that is
    so, why is anyone other than a clerk needed to maintain
    discipline in the classroom?)

    What is the teacher actually teaching in a class where Lit
    circles are in progress? Is he/she teaching only how to
    converse politely? If so, the lit circle can work (and the
    teacher has become merely a disciplinary clerk for the
    event), but if the *subject* of the conversation at the
    tables is important, how can the teacher be assured *that*
    is what is effected? How can he even be sure that common
    sense is governing the discussion? Is the teacher able to be
    a every table constantly? And even it that were possible,
    what *exactly* is the student learning from his neighbor?
    And isn't *exactly* what he is learning the very measure of
    the course?

    The teacher is a mind thinking about the subject in a way
    that he should want his students to think about it. He does
    not want his students to think WHAT he thinks, but HOW he
    thinks about it, the advantages and limits of that HOW.

    I will appreciate any discussion of the above points.

    L. Swilley

    2.

    RESPOND TO THIS POST START A NEW THREAD RETURN TO CHATBOARD

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • Lit Circle Schedule and Structure, 8/19/08, by Jessica .
  • Re: Lit Circle Schedule and Structure, 8/20/08, by Teri.
  • Re: For Jessica, 8/21/08, by L. Swilley .
  • Re: For Jessica, 8/22/08, by Teri.

     
     

You are on the LITERATURE CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST

Check out our latest FREE Lesson Plans...
 
Google
 
Web Teachers.Net
Click here
  Site Map: Home Search Teaching Jobs Classifieds Lesson Plans Contacts PR AdvertiseSite Map
  © 1996 - 2008. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.