Vermont utility confirms system breach by Russians

Join Teachers.Net

Chatboards

Recent Groups

Politics

MEMBERS

8 Members

+ Join Group

Politics Chatboard

Vermont utility confirms system breach by Russians

by Chalky

Dec 31, 2016

PEOTUS Trump's bestie is such a smart guy!

Comment

(10)

report post

view previous comments

hysterical progressives hate the US so why do they stay? On 12/31/16, T.E.C. - Iowa wrote: > The truth is, this is all about money to the military > industrial complex. They need enemies and terrorism is not > big enough - particularly to warrant spending a trillion > dollars on more nukes. This is simply our government - > including the intelligence agencies that told us Iraq had > wea...See More

Jan 1, 2017

report post

T.E.C. - Iowa The poster wrote, "They (Ray McGovern and others) can declare anything they like (the Clinton issue being a leak rather than a hack). They aren't intelligence officials any more."

The poster did not bother to read what the group wrote in the memorandum or the poster would know better than this.

Worse, I do not get the po...See More

Jan 1, 2017

report post

not a breach, just some malware On 1/01/17, T.E.C. - Iowa wrote:
> The poster wrote, "They (Ray McGovern and others) can
> declare anything they like (the Clinton issue being a
> leak rather than a hack). They aren't intelligence
> officials any more."
>
> The poster did not bother to read what the group wrote in
> the memora...See More

Jan 1, 2017

report post

T.E.C. - Iowa About "Consortium News! left-wing site. Their bias, and yours is all over the post. it is only bias if you can find what they are saying is wrong. Conservatives never do that! They just ASS-U-ME.

About, "You didn't supply any experts", yes I did! You were just not paying attention!

I wrote, "Neoliberal capitali...See More

Jan 2, 2017

report post

progressives want to see nations die On 1/02/17, T.E.C. - Iowa wrote: > About "Consortium News! left-wing site. Their bias, and yours > is all over the post. it is only bias if you can find what > they are saying is wrong. Conservatives never do that! They > just ASS-U-ME.

Consortium is left-wing. This means that you like their bias and that means they say th...See MoreOn 1/02/17, T.E.C. - Iowa wrote: > About "Consortium News! left-wing site. Their bias, and yours > is all over the post. it is only bias if you can find what > they are saying is wrong. Conservatives never do that! They > just ASS-U-ME.

Consortium is left-wing. This means that you like their bias and that means they say the stuff with which you agree and you progressives just don't like seeing things you don't agree with which is also why you pretend that it doesn't exist. LOL

> About, "You didn't supply any experts", yes I did! You were > just not paying attention!

Nope, you didn't. you talked about experts as if they'd offered opinions on your rant but you didn't name or link those experts. > I wrote, "Neoliberal capitalism destroyed manufacturing jobs > in America, and the poster responded with "tec has opinions > about free-market economies." Not just my opinion, the IMF > agrees that the job loss is directly related to the Neoliberal > characteristic of "increased competition—achieved through > deregulation and the opening up of domestic markets, including > financial markets, to foreign competition."

Competition and lower prices from abroad damaged American manufacturing but didn't destroy it. Make up much garbage? You like blathering about neoliberalism as if its the sacred text and controls all things but you're wrong about this too. You even admit that I'm right. Foreign competition.

> About "modernize nuclear facilities", if you do not understand > that we will never use these nuclear weapons, you are clueless > about what will happen in a nuclear exchange. Over at > National Geographic, I found this would happen if we used 0.03 > percent of the world's nukes:

What's wrong with you? I quote the NY Times on this and you want to pretend you know better. Your emptyheaded approach to nuclear conflict is particularly absurd. We could use tactical nukes against ISIS with zero fallout or long-term risk but you think our doing that would provoke Russia or something.

> "Our results suggest that agriculture could be severely > impacted, especially in areas that are susceptible to > late-spring and early-fall frosts," said Oman, of NASA's > Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

I do get a laugh when you take quotes out of context and pretend you have a clue. You read a paragraph out of the page and figured it suited your needs. Want a quarter? You could buy a clue. LOLOLOL > "Examples similar to the crop failures and famines experienced > following the Mount Tambora eruption in 1815 could be > widespread and last several years," he added. That Indonesian > volcano ushered in "the year without summer," a time of > famines and unrest.

Or not. Really? You think we'd go into a nuclear winter? AHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA No one says we have to have global thermonuclear war. Why would it start? Will President Clinton decide she needs to take Russia down a peg? We're not at war with either China or Russia though Russia is having fun with Obama and in his fury Obama is issuing thousands of regulations to further screw out economy. Progressives love killing economies. Its kind of curious that we haven't used tactical nukes already against armored divisions.

> And just how the world would stop at 0.03 percent of the > arsenal is something the military people ponder. Borrow a > quarter and buy a clue! Colin Powell is right; nukes are useless!

The only reason to use a nuclear weapon is to achieve a military objective like eliminating a threat. Why would a gov't continue bombing if it had done that? (can't wait for tec the self-deluded military tactics expert to show up and lecture us on some early 20th century expert's opinion about something else.

Jan 2, 2017

report post

More discussions on the Politics Chatboard...

Re: Been a while...

by oldnow

If this doesn't shake you, nothing will

by Bob R/CA

With friends like this...

by Bob R/CA

Re: Well, well, well.

by Bob R/CA

12 Russian generals indicted in Trump election crimes