Re: STI

Posted by catbird on 9/23/02

More | Report Post

On 9/22/02, KYkakker wrote:
> I don't teach Special Education so I don't know about SETS
> specifically, but I do know we've been pretty dissatisfied with
> STI in terms of posting grades and the incompetence of the woman
> sent to conduct a 3-hr "training" session, and lack of
> documentation provided. Not to mention the fact that it has
> mysteriously "lost" entire sets of grades -- luckily I had made a
> hard copy the week before, so I just had to re-post the grades
> (and also I had evidence for those in our office that the program
> HAD lost the grades and that I had not simply made a mistake in
> posting them).
>
> Not exactly what you asked, I know, but it seemed relevant.

Yes, it is relevent, thank-you. Isn't it a shame that we feel the
need to proove that that we did the right thing because of course
we must have done something wrong.

Posts on this thread, including this one

• special education SETS, 9/19/02, by catbird.
• Re: special education SETS, 9/19/02, by SETS - Bah Humbug!.
• Re: special education SETS, 9/20/02, by catbird.
• Re: STI, 9/22/02, by KYkakker.
• Re: Catbird-this one's for you, 9/22/02, by Bluegrass Educator.
• Re: Catbird-this one's for you, 9/23/02, by catbird.
• Re: STI, 9/23/02, by catbird.

The Counsel.Net ChatBoard^sm. All Rights Reserved.