Re: Wow

Noshoes

Posted on 11/11/09

More | Report Post

On 11/11/09, Yes wrote:
> Dan,
>
> My point entirely. If we paid educators properly UP FRONT, we'd get
> quality personnel 'right off the bat.'
>
> K. S.
>
> On 11/10/09, Dan wrote:
>> I'm sorry, I should clarify. I came across a thread about National
>> Boards, and the debate over funding the stipend. I thought my post
>> was going to be associated with that particular thread. Most of
>> the comments were terribly written and oftentimes ridiculous in
>> concept. If you don't know the difference between "there"
>> and "their", or feel that the drinking water in SC contributes to
>> poor test scores, you certainly can't claim to be a top-notch
>> educator who deserves a 30% raise.
>>
>>
>> On 11/10/09, Angie wrote:
>>> I agree with both of you. I only returned to look for something
>>> nice to get a Student Teacher.
>>>
>>> I quit visiting the chatboard years ago because I could not
>>> believe how mean some of the posters were. It doesn't appear that
>>> it has changed.
>>>
>>> Have A Great Year!
>>>
>>> On 11/10/09, Too right wrote:
>>>> Dan,
>>>>
>>>> As a teacher myself, I heartily concur! Higher wages for
>>>> teachers would allow for the recruitment of quality individuals
>>>> to go into the profession. As it stands now, one generally
>>>> gets what one pays for...
>>>>
>>>> Ken
>>>>
>>>> On 11/10/09, Dan wrote:
>>>>> I stumbled across this thread by accident. I couldn't stop
>>>>> reading!! I couldn't believe how illogical most posts
>>>>> were, and the grammatical and spelling errors committed
>>>>> by...teachers! Very sad. Good luck keeping that NB money
>>>>> though. That's the important thing, right.

Posts on this thread, including this one