New Jobs on Teachers.Net

Brandeis Hillel Day Sc...
San Francisco

Brandeis Hillel Day Sc...
San Francisco

Brandeis Hillel Day Sc...
San Francisco

Colorado School for th...

The Help Group
Los Angeles

Pine Street School
New York

ASU Preparatory Academ...


    Re: SCDE Refuses to Talk with a SC teacher

    First, I'm not angry at anyone. I don't waste the energy on anger,
    that's what Triathlons are for. :) I do know the employment laws in NC,
    SC, TN, and KS. I was not only a Sr. PM in those states, but also
    started in HR and Compliance. I am very well aware.

    I will say that while I have worked with many angry men, I still find
    humor in their discountenance of a female opinion. I love it, it makes
    me laugh, so thank you. :)

    I am also successfully going through ADEPT, Mr. Rogers. I know the
    "rules." I also know that in the state of SC, one of the most protected
    jobs is a government job which is what teaching is. I'm not trying to
    belittle my own job by calling it a "government" job. There's no shame
    in that, but that is what it is. All of the co workers I'm going
    through ADEPT with are also successful in this first semester. I'm
    thankful for that. I love the people I work with and I hope they stay.

    I will admit though...Mr. Jones, I do not have the time nor want to read
    your entire post. Lecture bores me.

    Have a great day!

    On 12/27/09, Will Rogers wrote:
    > Mr Jones and Ms. Angie,
    > You two do not know the law and have a REALLY wide streak of anger!
    > WOW! I just went through ADEPT, and Passed, and a co-worker did the
    > same.
    > If you fail ADEPT, you have the RIGHT to DEMAND a year of
    > remediation. That means the administration, BY LAW, MUST PROVIDE
    > Why tear down all the time, try to make the system better! If YOU
    > have issues, fix them and move on.
    > Will
    > On 12/22/09, Theodore A. Jones wrote:
    >> No person or organization, especially a government organization,
    >> is allowed the latitude of contemptuousness of public
    > policy in
    >> the United States without becoming conspicuous. It may have
    >> skipped your notice but deliberately with holding pertinent
    >> information to a person to whom a government organization
    >> proposes an employment situation that will result in the
    >> inevitable detriment to the person employed is indeed
    >> objectionable and contrary to the public policy of the Untied
    > *****SNIP!****
    >> On 12/22/09, Angie wrote:
    >>> This may come as a shock to most teachers, but in any other
    >>> profession no reason has to be given for a termination of
    >>> employment. Everyone is an employee at will and SC is a state
    >>> where the employer can terminate employment as they see fit.
    >>> While it appears that the district used the guise of ADEPT to
    >>> rid itself of unwanted employees, it is not illegal. I do not
    >>> pretend to know the reasons, but I'm certain there are some.
    >>> Take solace in the fact that for everything there is a reason
    >>> and a purpose; there's no such thing as 'accidents.'
    > *****snip*****