Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials
    Posted by: Questions to both psyguy and anon? on 6/08/14
    () Comments

    On 6/08/14, question for PsyGuy wrote:
    > The purpose of an underground movement is to put a strategy
    into
    > place that works to change a system without tipping off the
    > other side, thus giving the other side the advantage of time to
    > mount opposition. State testing will fall next.

    If testing goes away, (which by the way every state currently
    has some form of testing,) how will districts show yearly student
    growth?

    Question back
    > to PsyGuy: Why scare teachers that they will be nonrenewed for
    > not being a team player if, as you say, they are going to be
    > replaced anyway with uncertified facilitators?

    No, this is not true. Teachers have to be certified. Texas
    already created the answer to not having enough teachers when the
    state instituted "alternative certification." If I am wrong,
    psyguy, please prove your point by showing it in the Texas
    education code.

    >
    > 6/07/14, PsyGuy wrote:
    >> We already have privatized schools, they are called private
    >> schools.

    I used to think that school choice was not a good thing. Now,
    however, after reading the main teacher board posting related to
    gay pride, based on some of the comments related to going around
    local control, and teachers advocating spreading their own
    agenda, I have changed my mind.

    >> On 6/07/14, ANON is right wrote:
    >>> Anon posted one of the most intelligent posts we have had
    >>> in a long time.

    The media is undermining teachers on
    >>> purpose. agree

    It is all about privatizing public schools, which
    >>> will cost us our jobs as we know of them. The move to
    >>> create "choice" will hire uncertified teachers and destroy
    >>> our profession, including PsyGuy, who is on the other side
    >>> most of the time. disagree

    Please, teachers, join the underground movement to "keep" Common
    Core out and get rid of C-Scope. agree

    Join in and educate parents that Pearson
    >>> is a big part of the problem.

    I don't see this. We haven't had a textbook to use
    (because it was outdated) in 10 years! This year we are finally
    adopting and teachers are excited! As for errors, c-scope was a
    mess, but we will see with the new digital textbook adoption.

    The original poster is
    >>> right. Why should our students in the US have crappy
    >>> books, full of errors, and why should our money be thrown
    >>> away on this junk. Rise up, teachers. No one will fire
    >>> you. There are too many of us speaking up now. Parents are
    >>> way more informed and they back the real teachers who are
    >>> speaking up.


    Posts on this thread, including this one

  • Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/02/14, by disgusted.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/03/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/04/14, by disgusted.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/04/14, by anon.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/04/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/04/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/07/14, by ANON is right.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/07/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/08/14, by question for PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/08/14, by Questions to both psyguy and anon?.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/08/14, by hope for teachers.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/08/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/08/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/08/14, by PsyGuy.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/09/14, by Great hope for teachers.
  • Re: Pearson, Mifflin-Harcourt matetials, 6/11/14, by PsyGuy.