The whole class is working on the same text during this time correct?
If the teacher chooses to work with a small group then the rest of the class can work in different formats right? For instance: 1 group of 4 or 5 students to work with the teacher a couple of students working with partners. and a couple more working individually.
When doing the Guess the Covered Words section, do you choose reading vocabulary words, content area words, or just random words? I am trying to plan for the week after TAKS so I can use my current kids as guinea pigs! I would love any advise on getting started. 4th grade by the way.
At the...See MoreOn 4/20/09, mstex wrote: > When doing the Guess the Covered Words section, do you > choose reading vocabulary words, content area words, or > just random words? I am trying to plan for the week after > TAKS so I can use my current kids as guinea pigs! I would > love any advise on getting started. 4th grade by the way.
At the start use cover words that contribute to the meaning of the key words (your vocabulary words).
You can reintroduce a new paragraph and cover the actual vocabulary words AFTER you have done your unit.
Remember that they must not start with a vowel.
Good luck on the test. I'll be in the exact same boat.
I have read that students should read silently 20 seconds and then have one student read out loud to model the coaching. How long does this student read for? Does just one student read that day? Do they take turns (but then it would become a round robin group)? I'm just kind of confused as to how to progress through the text with the kids.
How do you deal with all the TAKS stuff and still do 4 blocks? Do you throw in TAKS blocks throughout the year or cram it in at the end? I really want to get a grip on this. Thank you so much.
...See MoreOn 4/21/09, mstex wrote: > How do you deal with all the TAKS stuff and still do 4 > blocks? Do you throw in TAKS blocks throughout the year or > cram it in at the end? I really want to get a grip on this. > Thank you so much.
I am by no means an expert. And for those who do not know TAKS is our states standardized test.
It is something I am still playing around with. I'm already planning for next year. I want to focus on strategy comprehension throughout the year (during the guided reading block), the GR book offers a great start but I don't think they are all of the the strategies that could be done at that time. I want to include the QAR strategy at the start year and have students practice throughout the year. There are also a couple of resources that I'm looking at right not. Test Talks is one of them, the other is my Donna Santman and Calkins, can't remember the name right now. It talks about adding "test practice" while focusing on comprehension.
During the last couple of weeks (2-4), leading up to the test, I think the GR block would be a good time to get that actual test practice so students are familiar with the test. Students can re-read the practice items for multiple purposes over 3 days.
I, of course would not do this the whole year, just to get them familiar with the test. I think it would be unfair to send the kids without any clue of how test attempts to trick them.
This is just my opinion and I'm still kind of thinking things through.
Also, I'm not officially doing the 4 Blocks. I just got my grade level excited about it and it seems like they want to do it. I've convinced them to do a book study for next year. Now I just have to get my principal on board, hopefully it can spread from there. :)
Our district is piloting both Rebekah Sitton and Words Their Way as "spelling programs" for 5th and 6th grade. Who has used each or both and what are the advantages/disadvantages of each?
If you are looking for ...See MoreWe are about to embark on using WTW the individualized way after using it whole class last year. I would like to see some real research on WTW. One of the national teacher union magz (the one that comes out seasonally)dedicated the main part of the issue to spelling research and it does not match what WTW proclaims.
If you are looking for a good program with valid and reliable research to back it up, try Spelling Mastery put out by SRA. I started the year last year using it (2 spelling groups, but the materials are already created) my students really enjoyed. We got about three weeks into it and our district handed us WTW all of a sudden, so I went with it even though I don't believe in it. What's a teacher to do?
The article I'm speaking of can be seen at [link removed]
On 6/25/09, JAM, with a whopper of a response wrote: > My district adopted Sitton Spelling two years ago. I used it > religiously and was not really impressed. It relies on direct > instruction for EVERY lesson. It is exhausting for the > teacher. Kids do not seem to take personal responsibility to > master spelling rules at all. The lessons in each unit are not > tested in the unit cloze test, either-- the philosophy is that > kids are told that this will be tested sometime soon... so don't > forget. The tests include random words from the grade level's > word list (500 words at the 5th grade level). Not enough > motivation for kids to retain spelling rules in my opinion. > Nothing seems to follow the Gradual Release of Respnsibility > MOdel at all. I do/We do/We do more/You do and I watch/You do > independently. > > But then again, I guess I am a bit of an old fashioned spelling > person... I miss the lists and tests like in the old Scott > Forsman. Forget the write the word 20 times or write them all > in sentences-- that stuff was crap. I'm all for teaching the > rule (words with /ow/ sounds, for example), giving them > meaningful practice that gets them thinking how to apply the > rules, and testing them with a dictation test. Then they can > solidify the rules in their heads and be accountable for showing > their ability. Parents can also help them master them if they > know what words to focus on. > > With RSitton there is no homework. (well... there is one page > per unit, but it is not always clear or useful). There are no > spelling lists or even one specific spelling pattern per unit. > In fact, there are two or three completely disconnected skill > lessons per unit that are not ever tested. Like /ow/ sounds, > contractions, and doubling the consonant lessons, all in one > unit. It is maddening! > > I've used WTW at summer school a few times and while I do think > it engages students more, it also fails in my opinion. The > basis of the WTW unit is word sorts, and my students got very > good at sorting words by sound, then pattern. BUT they could > not necessarily tranfer that ability to writing words correctly > in their own work. It is also hard to prep for because each > child or small group is working on a different list and spelling > pattern, and those word cards don't make themselves! > > I know this all sounds like a downer-- I'm just not happy with > anything am I! I'm not trying to be a Negative Nelly. I have > been very frustrated with my school's spelling instruction and I > don't see kids getting any better with the new program. Some > 5th graders still come to me not knowing the difference between > take, tack, and tak. Ridiculous! > > JAM > Who is going rebel next fall and will do what it takes to help > them become spellers by the spring
I read on the four blocks (wfu) site that the MxM Phonics books have been updated as of 2008.
[link removed]
If I order from Carson Dellosa, will I get the latest edition? (The Carson Dellosa site doesn't reference the pub. date.) If not there, where do I order?