I will be teaching reading to a small group of gifted 4th graders. The teacher requested that I choose a novel with a Civil War theme. The students are in Virginia. Any suggestions?
On 2/25/10, instructours wrote: > Across Five Aprils by Irene Hunt (I read it when it came out: > I was ten years old!) > 1965 Newberry Honor Title > The story of young Jethro Creighton, who comes of age during > the turbulent years of the Civil War. Poignant, heartwarming, > and heart-breaking story of an Illinois farm family and their > saga during the Civil War. Insightful look at how war affects > even the closest families. Well-researched and highly recommended. > 170 pgs > a > > Here is information for the study guide. > [link removed]?
My child is an intelligent young man. Gifted with musical ability as well. He excels in music playing multiple instuments but academically it is like pulling teeth to get him to do his homework or study. I have tried restrictions, loss of "electronics", etc. Threatened, begged and pleaded. Nothing has made a dent. Help!!
So there's no answer at present. Some things are not meant to be and not every problem has a present solution. I was a flake all through college - looking back on that I regret it but nothing anybody could do could make me buckle down and do the work properly.
I guess you're left to say "John, we've tried everything to no avail. If you've got other ideas as to how better to pursue school success for you please let us know. In the meantime, we cannot allow you to get your learner's permit and please know we're are a bit genuinely worried for your future - what you do now can matter.
But John there's always community college."
And there always is and it's a great deal less expensive than all other schools into which he can certainly transfer if when in community college he does figure it out.
Some of the most gifted minds in history did not do well in school - Einstein for one. Your son is in good company.
Devin StangOn 3/18/12, Sara wrote: > On 3/11/10, Bobbie wrote: >> Sara, thank you for your response but I feel like the scolded child >> here. We have tried other options as well. Agenda books, medications, >> tutors, diets,early bedtime, later bedtime, text reminders, talking, >> etc., etc.. I read everything I can find to read. I ...See MoreOn 3/18/12, Sara wrote: > On 3/11/10, Bobbie wrote: >> Sara, thank you for your response but I feel like the scolded child >> here. We have tried other options as well. Agenda books, medications, >> tutors, diets,early bedtime, later bedtime, text reminders, talking, >> etc., etc.. I read everything I can find to read. I meet with >> teachers who tell me he just isn't applying himself. He is immature. >> He will grow out of it. Tutors tell us, he knows how to do the work! >> > > So there's no answer at present. Some things are not meant to be and not > every problem has a present solution. I was a flake all through college - > looking back on that I regret it but nothing anybody could do could make > me buckle down and do the work properly. > > I guess you're left to say "John, we've tried everything to no avail. If > you've got other ideas as to how better to pursue school success for you > please let us know. In the meantime, we cannot allow you to get your > learner's permit and please know we're are a bit genuinely worried for > your future - what you do now can matter. > > But John there's always community college." > > And there always is and it's a great deal less expensive than all other > schools into which he can certainly transfer if when in community college > he does figure it out. > > Some of the most gifted minds in history did not do well in school - > Einstein for one. Your son is in good company. > >> >> There are many resource books for gifted children not fulfilling their potential available now on amazon, etc.
I love it. The pros are the kids and how much fun they are to teach. They lap up learning like sponges. They appreciate intriguing things that other kids don't even notice much less appreciate. If presented in the right way, a GT student can be intrigued by most anything because if you really think about it, there is something of interest in everything.
When taught as GT students, GT kids Love their school day and leave it looking forward to coming back the next day. And I find their parents for the most part as bright and talented as the kids and very pleasant - and interesting - to be around.
The only con is that some parents are very driven and always want more, more, more and their children however bright are yet children who can't do more, more, more. Some parents equate giftedness with work, work, work. They see their child's talent as a reason to drive the child hard.
I can contend with such parents but my post would get too long if I told you how but know it's very possible not only to contend with such parents but also to charm them and ultimately get along with them and sometimes - even get them to see your point of view and lighten up on their child.
Perhaps another con would be - I spend hours every night preparing still after 20 plus years of teaching. I'm constantly searching for something new, something that will intrique them even more. The Internet has made those hours of preparation much easier as now I can spend them at home instead of a library.
And this is Not a con for me but other GT teachers sometimes complain of their students' willingness to debate them... GT kids do not take things at face value or without question. Their minds are working and they see through conventional explanations in about - 30 seconds. With GT kids, you too much think like them and be ready to be reflective and to reason with them and to be logical in your thinking.
"Because I said so" is usually not the best way to approach GT kids and if you want to teach like that, you will end up battling with your GT kids who need reasons and are Very capable of understanding reasons and telling good ones from bad.
Congress in the Classroom is a national, award-winning education program now in its 19th year. Developed and sponsored by The Dirksen Congressional Center, the workshop is dedicated to the exchange of ideas and information on teaching about Congress.
Congress in the Classroom is designed for high school or middle school teachers who teach U.S. history, government, civics, political science, or social studies. Forty teachers will be selected to take part in the program. All online applications must be received by no later than April 15, 2010. We will notify individuals of our decisions by April 30, 2010.
Although the workshop will feature a variety of sessions, the 2010 program will feature a broad overview of Congress with special attention to the mid-year elections of 2010. Tentative session titles are listed below. Additional sessions will be announced as presenters are confirmed. More information about the content of each session will be posted on our Web site as it becomes available shortly after February 15.
Throughout the program, you will work with subject matter experts as well as colleagues from across the nation. This combination of firsthand knowledge and peer-to-peer interaction will give you new ideas, materials, and a professionally enriching experience.
"Until now so much of what I did in my class on Congress was straight theory-this is what the Constitution says, "noted one of our teachers."Now I can use these activities and illustrations to help get my students involved in the class and at the very least their community but hopefully in the federal government. This workshop has given me a way to help them see how relevant my class is and what they can do to help make changes in society."
In sum, the workshop consists of two types of sessions: those that focus on recent research and scholarship about Congress (and don't always have an immediate application in the classroom) and those geared to specific ways to teach students about the federal legislature.
The 2010 workshop will be held Monday, July 26 - Thursday, July 29, at Embassy Suites, East Peoria, Illinois.
The program is certified by the Illinois State Board of Education for up to 22 Continuing Education Units. The program also is endorsed by the National Council for the Social Studies.
Participants are responsible for (1) a non-refundable $125 registration fee (required to confirm acceptance after notice of selection) and (2)transportation to and from Peoria, Illinois. Many school districts will pay all or a portion of these costs.
The Center pays for three nights lodging at the headquarters hotel (providing a single room for each participant), workshop materials, local transportation, all but three meals, and presenter honoraria and expenses. The Center spends between $30,000 and $35,000 to host the program each year.
What follows are the sessions planned for the 2010 edition of Congress in the Classroom. Please re-visit the site for changes as the program develops.
Session Titles, 2010:
* "The View from Capitol Hill" Congressman Aaron Schock (R- IL, 18th District)INVITED
* "Congressional Insight" A team-oriented, highly interactive simulation of a Congress member’s first term CONFIRMED
* "The Congressional Time Line Project" Frank Mackaman and Cindy Koeppel, The Dirksen Congressional Center CONFIRMED
* "Can Congress Ever Be Poplular?" Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, University of Nebraska-Lincoln CONFIRMED
* "How Fantasy Football Saved Congress: Active Learning through a Congressional Drafting Game" Jennifer J. Hora, Department of Political Science, Valparaiso University CONFIRMED
* "Help for Teachers from the Office of History and Preservation" Kathleen Johnson, Historical Publications Specialist, Office of History and Preservation, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives CONFIRMED
* "A View of Congress from the White House: What the Presidential Tapes Reveal" KC Johnson, Department of History, Brooklyn College CONFIRMED
* "A Journalist’s Take on Congress" David Lightman, Congressional Correspondent, McClatchy News Service CONFIRMED
* "Teaching with Primary Sources" Cindy Rich, Project Director, Teaching with Primary Sources, Eastern Illinois University CONFIRMED
* Leadership in the House During the 111th Congress" Bryan Marshall, Department of Political Science, Miami University of Ohio
* "What is Most Important to Teach about Congress?" Teachers CONFIRMED
* "The Five Best New Books on Congress" Teacher Panel CONFIRMED
* "Election 2010: Why Do Voters Vote the Way They Do?" Andrew Civettini, Department of Political Science, Knox College CONFIRMED
* "The Ten Most Important Things to Know about Congress" Frank H. Mackaman, The Dirksen Congressional Center CONFIRMED
* "How to Get Your Point Across to Congress Members" Stephanie Vance, Advocacy Associates, Washington, DC CONFIRMED
Take a look at The Dirksen Center Web site -- [link removed].
* REGISTRATION *
If you are interested in registering for the Congress in the Classroom 2010 workshop, you can complete an online registration form found at: [link removed]
SueAnnIt is my understanding that the gifted program in not an option. It is mandated by state law. You need to check into this and see what your state law mandates. Just doesn't sound right. Did they offer to place you in another position?
Kim IvinsVery thankful for all of the suggestions. Please know that I do have a job, only because I have been teaching for 29 years. Unfortunately, I will be bumping another teacher
I have a parent who no longer wants her child to come to gifted. However, she is reluctant to sign any paperwork that says her child is no longer receiving gifted services. I would like to know what other states do in this situation. I want the child off my roll so I don't have to keep updating the IEP every year.
Parent and teacherI removed my daughter from the pull-out gifted program last school year because it interfered with her regular class, and she was so stressed out having to make-up missed work (every lunch period, recess, and at home, too). I simply stated, "I am removing her form the pull out program (it was May)" I also stipulated that she will be re-entering the...See MoreI removed my daughter from the pull-out gifted program last school year because it interfered with her regular class, and she was so stressed out having to make-up missed work (every lunch period, recess, and at home, too). I simply stated, "I am removing her form the pull out program (it was May)" I also stipulated that she will be re-entering the program in her Junior High (the following year) since the Gifted class was a regularly scheduled class. No re-application was necessary. In her district, once you are eligible for the GT program, that does not change. In MY district, the same process is in place. Kids are not re- tested for admission into the gifted program if a parent decides to drop them for a period of time. The rationale for this: IQ does not change. Chances are, the child qualified once, the standardized tests were advanced, and it would cost the district more money/time to re-test. Once eligible= eligible for life. However, it appears that this may not be the case in all districts. On 3/23/10, gph wrote: > I have a parent who no longer wants her child to come to > gifted. However, she is reluctant to sign any paperwork > that says her child is no longer receiving gifted > services. I would like to know what other states do in > this situation. I want the child off my roll so I don't > have to keep updating the IEP every year.
On 3/27/10, Parent and teacher wrote: > I removed my daughter from the pull-out gifted program last > school year because it interfered with her regular class, and > she was so stressed out having to make-up missed work (every > lunch period, recess, and at home, too). I simply stated, "I > am removing her form the pull out program (it was May)" I > also stipulated that she will be re-entering the program in > her Junior High (the following year) since the Gifted class > was a regularly scheduled class. > No re-application was necessary. In her district, once you > are eligible for the GT program, that does not change. > In MY district, the same process is in place. Kids are not re- > tested for admission into the gifted program if a parent > decides to drop them for a period of time. The rationale for > this: IQ does not change. Chances are, the child qualified > once, the standardized tests were advanced, and it would cost > the district more money/time to re-test. Once eligible= > eligible for life. > However, it appears that this may not be the case in all > districts. > On 3/23/10, gph wrote: >> I have a parent who no longer wants her child to come to >> gifted. However, she is reluctant to sign any paperwork >> that says her child is no longer receiving gifted >> services. I would like to know what other states do in >> this situation. I want the child off my roll so I don't >> have to keep updating the IEP every year.
A regular elementary ed teacher and I were talking about the theory that lack of rigor in the curriculum is why reading scores are stagnant. But she writes:
"I feel that our curriculum is rigorous, but it has to be taught so slowly for the bottom that the top either loses interest or motivation. The focus is always on reteaching, remediation, tutoring, etc. The top would be challenged with our curriculum at a normal pace. The bottom are ALWAYS challenged. The material is always over their heads. Again, No Child Left Behind, has played a large part in this. What can we do to stop this? There should be something our school could come up with that would again motivate our top."
Our school is dead-set against anything that smacks of elitism. Some pull-out is allowed, but my responsibilities stretch from K-8 across two schools. We tried an all-day pull-out for identified kids. Scores declined slightly and so we went back to areas of strength pull out only and not a mixed single group as before. We shall see with this year's scores but I hold out little hope of gains simply because ours is a district extremely adverse to anything smacking of intellectualism, including reading. And since reading is a huge part of math tests, there you have it.
The real problem, as I see it, is for the "high flyers," the high kids who aren't high enough to be considered gifted and thus don't qualify for formal anything. The problem with pulling non-identified (our IDing happens at the end of 3rd) is that kids then anticipate being identified and when they aren't, it's crushing to them and to me. But some sort of criteria is needed and when we went to a more subjective approach, I couldn't say no to anyone and thus had a hugely inflated group on my hands. I learned the rationale for objective criteria from that: you must have a way to explain why someone's in and why someone's out. Scores are the only way I know of to do that.
Anyway, these "left behind" non-identified kids are getting lost, as my friend wrote. What have you done to address this sort of problem, if you can relate to this problem at all!
On 4/01/10, GT Teacher wrote: > The problem it would seem to me isn't really the structure of your > curriculum or your 'high flyers'. > It's the culture of the community - I understand what you're saying > about reading now - my family's originally from Barbourville, > Kentucky... >> > And with such attitudes toward 'book-larnin'' and reading that are > common to your community, it's all but impossible to have a > positive impact on reading scores. > > To do well in school, you have to believe in school and not > everybody does. To battle your pneumonia with antibiotics, you have > to believe in antibiotics - not everybody does. > > Parents who don't believe in book-larning won't read to their kids. > Why should they I suppose - they did fine without it. Changing such > attitudes takes time and a lot of it. In the meantime, some kids > get shortchanged and that's a great shame. > > With all the research that's been done, no one has found the answer > to how to turn poor schools or rural schools around. Your school > community has a cultural bias against reading - fighting that is > like trying to swim upstream. > > You can search the ERIC database for some answers but the only > answer I know is that once in a while there comes a very charimatic > and well-regarded principal to whom the school community will > listen. Such people have the natural leadership schools to effect > change but such people are few and far between. > Good luck. Maybe try reading them stories - every class should be > read to outloud every day for 10-15 minutes by a reader who has a > very good and very expressive reading voice. Try > [link removed];
On 4/01/10, KK wrote: > A couple of thoughts in response to y...See MoreThese are great ideas, KK, and you're exactly right in your prognosis of some of the challenges! Especially the piece about high-fliers needing to be self-starters for compaction to work. I will put my thinking cap back on. Thank you so much for the encouragement.
MT
On 4/01/10, KK wrote: > A couple of thoughts in response to your post, Mary. > > I agree that the high flyer piece is a critical issue that no one is > focused on addressing. There are clearly kids who need more challenge > and are ready for more advanced, in-depth work who do not qualify for > gifted programs and often get nothing more than the classroom teacher is > willing or able to provide. Supporting those classroom teachers is > difficult when you're moving from building to building and maintaining > your own classes and lessons. > > Here are two ideas, and both come from Renzulli. > > First, enrichment clusters. This actually is a great tool for all kids, > but if you handle it well, it might also have the added bonus of drawing > your community members in to help with sessions and get engaged in the > learning community. When they see that you value their life skills > (gardening, for example, or journalism via the local newspaper's > expertise), they may appreciate the academic piece more. > > Second, curriculum compacting. This is difficult to do well, but if you > can manage it in small increments, many students can benefit. This > tends to work well for well-behaved self-starters, but for kids who are > bright and bouncy and less focused, they are likely to be left hanging, > because the classroom teacher may not have time to support them, and you > may not be available as often as you'd like to help keep them focused on > a different assignment or investigation. > > Good luck! > > > On 4/01/10, GT Teacher wrote: >> The problem it would seem to me isn't really the structure of your >> curriculum or your 'high flyers'. >> It's the culture of the community - I understand what you're saying >> about reading now - my family's originally from Barbourville, >> Kentucky... >>> >> And with such attitudes toward 'book-larnin'' and reading that are >> common to your community, it's all but impossible to have a >> positive impact on reading scores. >> >> To do well in school, you have to believe in school and not >> everybody does. To battle your pneumonia with antibiotics, you have >> to believe in antibiotics - not everybody does. >> >> Parents who don't believe in book-larning won't read to their kids. >> Why should they I suppose - they did fine without it. Changing such >> attitudes takes time and a lot of it. In the meantime, some kids >> get shortchanged and that's a great shame. >> >> With all the research that's been done, no one has found the answer >> to how to turn poor schools or rural schools around. Your school >> community has a cultural bias against reading - fighting that is >> like trying to swim upstream. >> >> You can search the ERIC database for some answers but the only >> answer I know is that once in a while there comes a very charimatic >> and well-regarded principal to whom the school community will >> listen. Such people have the natural leadership schools to effect >> change but such people are few and far between. >> Good luck. Maybe try reading them stories - every class should be >> read to outloud every day for 10-15 minutes by a reader who has a >> very good and very expressive reading voice. Try >> [link removed];