On 3/18/17, ljjh68 wrote: > Could you talk about how mentoring other teachers made > you reflect on your teaching and make better choices? > > On 3/18/17, What Works wrote: >> Maybe it's a matter of semantics, but I > don't think a >> PROGRAM is a COMMUNITY. If you began a > Mentoring >> Program, it might reflect a student need > or a Professional >> Need, but the program itself wouldn't be > a community. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 3/17/17, Betty Martinez wrote: >>> On 3/16/17, Mrs. D wrote: >>>> Would a Mentoring Program be > considered a >> professional >>>> learning community? >>> Only if you proof your students make > progress because of >>> that.
For the professional need I was thinking of talking about the fact that we have a growing number of ESL students as well as students that are strictly Spanish speaking. Since I am not Spanish speaking, I have been working with the Spanish teacher to gain some basic phrases so I can communicate with students. I have also been working with the ESL teacher to find Health Education material that they can use to gain content knowledge, as well as translate my quizzes and tests that they can access if they do not understand the question in English. As evidence I could show some of their projects and quizzes before and after as well as maybe a self assessment regarding their knowledge of the content having the material in both languages available.
I am writing my Planning for video 2. What exactly do they mean by "What are the instructional challenges represented by your students?" I am using a strategy group to show 4 students a new strategy for using text features. Thank you for any responses!
On 3/19/17, aloha wrote: > I am writing my Planning for video 2. What exactly do > they mean by "What are the instructional challenges > represented by your students?" I am using a strategy > group to show 4 students a new strategy for using text > features. Thank you for any responses!
I'm CTE - career/tech education- my At-A-Glances states:
--------------------------------------------------- Submit 1 packet for each assessment: -Assessment #1 Packet ....assessment #1 description form ....assessment #1 materials ....Student A & B work samples for assessment #1 ---------------------------------------------------
Okay, so I know what the description form is and the work samples... but what is the "materials"? is this additional evidence of strategies I utilized? is it my instruction page guide/rubric I will use to assign the assessment?
I have a short-answer questionnaire that I am using in the beginning of the lesson to gauge my students beliefs at that point- and why they believe etc... Should I submit a blank questionnaire, along with my student's filled ones?
I know- very choppy chain of thought! I'm in crunch mode!!! eeeeeek!
1) Can I use this as the formative assessment even though it is many wrapped up in the same one?
2) The self-assessments say they must include an opportunity for students to decide on next steps. This doesn't have that, so is this not going to work?
3) Do the 3 self-assessments all have to be exactly the same and be connected to the submitted formative assessment?
It appears that there are not a lot of ESL teacher who pursue NBPTS for ENL. Is there anybody on this board who has or is going through the process for ENL?
On 12/13/16, hstar wrote: > > I'm doing secondary Physics. I got 2.845 on Comp 1 and 2.0 on > comp 2. Not dead in the water, but not sitting pretty either. > I do not think it is fair that the overall average has not > been released yet. Can we even assume that 2.75 is the score > to shoot for? If so, then I need an average of 2.9something on > 3 and 4 with the weighted formula. > > On 12/12/16, Cheney825 wrote: >> IF the cut score is 2.75, and IF the weights are what they >> currently are, I need a 3.0 on Component 4 to pass. My >> Component 3 score was a 2.125 (which I have looked over it a >> million times since Saturday and i just can't see how that is >> possible), and I can't decide if I should go ahead and redo >> component 3 while I'm doing component 4 this year or wait and >> see how I do on component 4. I'm so deeply torn. This >> component 3 score has really shattered my confidence. I would >> love any feedback from my peers. It's been a hard couple >> days...
That said, the bottom line is that when your group began, it was plainly stated upfront that all info wouldn't be available until 2017. Those who started the first year just had to accept that - and if you did start then, you basically "agreed" and understood this was the case and went ahead and started anyway. However, even knowing that, one doesn't realize when just starting out the ramifications. You couldn't have known then how frustrating it would be.
My advice is to acknowledge your frustration - (which you've done here) - it's ok to feel that way - BUT don't let it eat away at you to the point of sucking your motivation away. There is nothing you can do to change this fact, so try hard to put it away for now. Give this last year your biggest effort yet so that when the cut score comes out, you won't have to worry about it. It will hurt you if you let this interfere with your efforts. It's like holding a grudge...the one hurt most is the one the grudge eats away at...not the person the grudge is focused on.
Hang in there just a little longer and give this a BIG PUSH!
On 3/18/17, Jenny wrote: > I hear you! I am in the same boat and trying to "guess" based > on the old way of scoring. I am guessing that I will not pass > in the end with my Component 3 score - similar to yours, and > devastating because I can't figure out why I got that score > either. I am choosing to retake it while I work on Comp 4 > just to prevent an additional year if possible. But again, it > is all a guess and a crap shoot since we do not have the > final scale. I feel our group is at a HUGE disadvantage > because of this and should be given more leniency since we > have no barometer along the way to know how we are ultimately > doing. I am with you. Devastated, unmotivated, not feeling > like I have direction for improving. > > On 12/13/16, hstar wrote: >> >> I'm doing secondary Physics. I got 2.845 on Comp 1 and 2.0 > on >> comp 2. Not dead in the water, but not sitting pretty > either. >> I do not think it is fair that the overall average has not >> been released yet. Can we even assume that 2.75 is the > score >> to shoot for? If so, then I need an average of 2.9something > on >> 3 and 4 with the weighted formula. >> >> On 12/12/16, Cheney825 wrote: >>> IF the cut score is 2.75, and IF the weights are what they >>> currently are, I need a 3.0 on Component 4 to pass. My >>> Component 3 score was a 2.125 (which I have looked over it > a >>> million times since Saturday and i just can't see how that > is >>> possible), and I can't decide if I should go ahead and > redo >>> component 3 while I'm doing component 4 this year or wait > and >>> see how I do on component 4. I'm so deeply torn. This >>> component 3 score has really shattered my confidence. I > would >>> love any feedback from my peers. It's been a hard couple >>> days...
I feel weird submitting a testimonial from my principal about my leadership, collaboration, and student impact on an initiative at our school with my name removed...seems to take out the entire point of "evidence". Similarly, a certificate from a PD session with my name on it...if I remove my name what proof is really left.
The general portfolio instructions (page 9) say our names should be removed from student work and not show up in written commentary, but no mention of this evidence. Any interpretation of this out there? Thanks in advance!
On 3/18/17, Biophysteach wrote: > I am compiling my evidence for professional and student > needs. I know to keep people and places as anonymous as > possible, but what should we do about evidence about us? > > I feel weird submitting a testimonial from my principal > about my leadership, collaboration, and student impact on an > initiative at our school with my name removed...seems to > take out the entire point of "evidence". Similarly, a > certificate from a PD session with my name on it...if I > remove my name what proof is really left. > > The general portfolio instructions (page 9) say our names > should be removed from student work and not show up in > written commentary, but no mention of this evidence. Any > interpretation of this out there? Thanks in advance!
For those of you who are World Language applicants, how did you receive your WPT and OPIc scores from ACTFL? LTI said I would need to contact the NBCT test coordinator, but I'm not sure who that is.
On 3/18/17, _almeida wrote: > For those of you who are World Language applicants, how did > you receive your WPT and OPIc scores from ACTFL? LTI said I > would need to contact the NBCT test coordinator, but I'm not > sure who that is.
Does anyone have practice constructed response questions for component 1 for exceptional needs (besides the three in the instructions)? Or a source for great practice questions?
> Could you talk about how mentoring other teachers made
> you reflect on your teaching and make better choices?
>
> On 3/18/17, What Works wrote:
>> Maybe it's a matter of semantics, but I
> don't think a
>> PROGRAM is a COMMUNITY. If you began a
> Mentoring
...See More