On 3/01/17, Rachel wrote: > I keep getting conflicting advice on whether or not to use > name abbreviations when referring to students in my small > group video lesson. My students names are Azul, Allison, > Izzabella and Zakilah so even trying to abbreviate them > without total confusion seems hard! what do you guys > think? In my comp 2 when i only spoke about 1 student i > did abbreviate with his first initial but that wont really work > considering these students names!
On 2/24/17, What Works wrote: > In your certificate area, you are asked to use reading for > one video and integrate the language arts process in the > other. In other elementary certificates, teachers must > choose 2 subject areas: math, science, and/or social > studies. > > First the assessors want to see your expertise in the > areas of your certificate - in your case reading and the > language arts processes. > > Second, they want to see how you manage different > formats, whole/large group, small group, individuals > and/or some other appropriate grouping. Read your > instructions to see what you're allowed in the LRLA > certificate. They want to see you using a variety of > strategies/management with different sizeed groups. > > Now to your question about the language arts processes. > These are explained in your NB STANDARDS. Find the > Standard that explains the various subject areas involved > in the Literacy certificate and read this Standard > thoroughly. In a nutshell they are: reading, writing, > speaking, listening, and viewing. But just seeing this list > won't be enough. Do read this Standard. It is the most > important foundation for C3. > > So one of your videos must focus on reading instruction. > The other needs to focus on something else but include > those language arts processes. So kids need to "view" > something..."look" at something, perhaps a chart, or > flashcards, or pictures...the sky's the limit. They need to > talk about the information you're presenting - with you > and with each other. They need to do some writing about > the topic, and listen to you and each other. You need to > plan a lesson that incorporates all those skills. > > The reading lesson you do should also show many if not > all of those skills as well. My guess is that you do this > everyday in almost every lesson. If you don't, you'll need > to figure out ways to show those things. They can > definitely be shown in a 30 minute lesson. If something > doesn't show in the 15 minutes you submit, then you > write about them. > > Hope this helps! > > > > > On 2/24/17, Sara wrote: >> In my component 3 instruction I have to create two > videos, one >> that show reading instruction and the other that shows >> integrating language arts processes. I have new groups > every >> 30 minutes because I teach Title I, can someone clarify > what >> language arts processes would be, because to me it > seems like I >> should be doing two videos that are similar. >> >> Thanks
On 3/01/17, Sara wrote: > Thank you so much for the clarification, you are right I do that > already, I am just so nervous I will video the wrong thing. Just one > more quick question. I have a small group I videoed on a lesson and > I am planning on videoing a one-on-one lesson with a student from > that same group. It will be a different lesson, is it ok to use the same > student in both videos? > > Thanks > Sara > > On 2/24/17, What Works wrote: >> In your certificate area, you are asked to use reading for >> one video and integrate the language arts process in the >> other. In other elementary certificates, teachers must >> choose 2 subject areas: math, science, and/or social >> studies. >> >> First the assessors want to see your expertise in the >> areas of your certificate - in your case reading and the >> language arts processes. >> >> Second, they want to see how you manage different >> formats, whole/large group, small group, individuals >> and/or some other appropriate grouping. Read your >> instructions to see what you're allowed in the LRLA >> certificate. They want to see you using a variety of >> strategies/management with different sizeed groups. >> >> Now to your question about the language arts processes. >> These are explained in your NB STANDARDS. Find the >> Standard that explains the various subject areas involved >> in the Literacy certificate and read this Standard >> thoroughly. In a nutshell they are: reading, writing, >> speaking, listening, and viewing. But just seeing this list >> won't be enough. Do read this Standard. It is the most >> important foundation for C3. >> >> So one of your videos must focus on reading instruction. >> The other needs to focus on something else but include >> those language arts processes. So kids need to "view" >> something..."look" at something, perhaps a chart, or >> flashcards, or pictures...the sky's the limit. They need to >> talk about the information you're presenting - with you >> and with each other. They need to do some writing about >> the topic, and listen to you and each other. You need to >> plan a lesson that incorporates all those skills. >> >> The reading lesson you do should also show many if not >> all of those skills as well. My guess is that you do this >> everyday in almost every lesson. If you don't, you'll need >> to figure out ways to show those things. They can >> definitely be shown in a 30 minute lesson. If something >> doesn't show in the 15 minutes you submit, then you >> write about them. >> >> Hope this helps! >> >> >> >> >> On 2/24/17, Sara wrote: >>> In my component 3 instruction I have to create two >> videos, one >>> that show reading instruction and the other that shows >>> integrating language arts processes. I have new groups >> every >>> 30 minutes because I teach Title I, can someone clarify >> what >>> language arts processes would be, because to me it >> seems like I >>> should be doing two videos that are similar. >>> >>> Thanks
The General Portfolio instructions for Component 2, 3 and 4 says, "the evidence submitted for Component 2 and Component 4 and one of the 2 video recordings submitted for Component 3 may be from the same unit of instruction, but must be from different lessons that have unique goals and objectives-even if all evidence is drawn from a single inst...See MoreThe General Portfolio instructions for Component 2, 3 and 4 says, "the evidence submitted for Component 2 and Component 4 and one of the 2 video recordings submitted for Component 3 may be from the same unit of instruction, but must be from different lessons that have unique goals and objectives-even if all evidence is drawn from a single instructional setting. Likewise, any assessments and/or examples of student work submitted for Component 2 must be different from those submitted Component 4". Before this new revision of guidelines was posted, I was planning on using my Evolution Unit for both Component 2 and 4. I have lessons and student work that I will submit for Component 2. The lessons have focused objectives for each lesson. I have also have formative, self and summative assessments I was planning to use for Component 4. So I'm trying to figure out if the assessments I gave during the unit can be used since I'm also using the same unit for component 2. Each lesson has a narrow objective, but the summative would measure that objective as well as the others in the whole unit. What are your thoughts? Can I continue to use the unit for both as long as I don't submit the same work for each one?
So starting Comp 2. Having a difficult time deciding what to do this 3 week unit over. What do everyone else choose? I was thinking about making connections to books
What does PROVIDE CONTEXT mean exactly? Do they want the self-assessment explained in terms of types/number of questions and format? Or is it asking for a general summary of the results of the self-assessment? Or....
On 2/28/17, CPJSWilliams wrote: > For my formative assessment entry the second question > asks " 2.Provide context for the examples of student > self-assessments." I have one page of space available to > write so it seems that it needs to be more in-depth than > glossed over. > > What does PROVIDE CONTEXT mean exactly? Do they want the > self-assessment explained in terms of types/number of > questions and format? Or is it asking for a general > summary of the results of the self-assessment? Or.... >
The latest version of the General Portfolio Instructions is different than the one posted earlier, so you may want to review the current one to see updated guidelines and rules.
Hi, can anyone offer some suggestions on what type questions could be asked for essay on the Career Tech Education Component 1 at the assessment center? Any thoughts greatly appreciated. here or email me at susiegalaxy@gmail.com
On 2/27/17, Laverne Godfrey wrote: > On 5/24/16, susan wrote: >> Hi, can anyone offer some suggestions on what >> type questions could be asked for essay on the >> Career Tech Education Component 1 at the >> assessment center? Any thoughts greatly >> appreciated. here or email me at >> [email removed]
For the formative this allowed me to include everything. For the summarize, after removing empty space I included one representative page for the multiple choice and one of the short answer/open ended. In the data section I included data for the entire test.
On 2/26/17, What Works wrote: > I hope others will also respond, but as to your > assessments, you can submit partial pages that would be > "representative" of the MC and/or essay questions. You > can label them just that way..."Representative test items" > or something similar. Assessors don't have to see the > whole thing. It's fine to use a student-completed sample. > > Hope that much helps! > > > On 2/26/17, ljjh68 wrote: >> I am working on Component 4 for EA Science. For my >> summative assessment, I give both a written response > and a >> multiple choice portion of the test. I have lots of >> students who are ELL so I use the multiple choice > portion >> to better gauge their understanding because writing is >> difficult for them. I still have them do the written part, >> because that provides valuable insight as well. For my > two >> pages summative assessment that I submit, I want to > include >> the written response page. I want to use one that was >> filled out by a student. I also want to include my > multiple >> choice questions, but there are 26 which cover three > pages. >> What are my options for reducing that to one? Can I > just >> list the questions asked and omit the answer choices? > How >> are other people Formatting their examples of > assessments?
On 2/26/17, Biophysteach wrote: > I am working on AYA science and have a similar format to my > assessments. I took out all extra spacing to shrink the > assessment without actually shrinking the font. For example, > I took out extra lines between questions, space to answer > open ended questions, put answer choices on the same line, > removed the title/name etc from first page. I would never > actually give a test using this format, but it allows for more > content on a page. > > For the formative this allowed me to include everything. For > the summarize, after removing empty space I included one > representative page for the multiple choice and one of the > short answer/open ended. In the data section I included data > for the entire test. > > > On 2/26/17, What Works wrote: >> I hope others will also respond, but as to your >> assessments, you can submit partial pages that would be >> "representative" of the MC and/or essay questions. You >> can label them just that way..."Representative test items" >> or something similar. Assessors don't have to see the >> whole thing. It's fine to use a student-completed sample. >> >> Hope that much helps! >> >> >> On 2/26/17, ljjh68 wrote: >>> I am working on Component 4 for EA Science. For my >>> summative assessment, I give both a written response >> and a >>> multiple choice portion of the test. I have lots of >>> students who are ELL so I use the multiple choice >> portion >>> to better gauge their understanding because writing is >>> difficult for them. I still have them do the written part, >>> because that provides valuable insight as well. For my >> two >>> pages summative assessment that I submit, I want to >> include >>> the written response page. I want to use one that was >>> filled out by a student. I also want to include my >> multiple >>> choice questions, but there are 26 which cover three >> pages. >>> What are my options for reducing that to one? Can I >> just >>> list the questions asked and omit the answer choices? >> How >>> are other people Formatting their examples of >> assessments?
Hi, Working on the Professional Learning Need Form and the Student Need Form. The PLN Form indicates a connection to a student need. Should this be the same as what I describe in the SN Form? Or should these be two separate descriptions? Are they meant to connect with each other? Thanks, Leslie
On 3/01/17, Rachel wrote: > I keep getting conflicting advice on whether or not to use > name abbreviations when ref...See More