I'd say either/and/or...how's that for an answer! Both of those strategies are ways to differentiate. What do YOU do? Whatever it is, you'll explain what YOUR practice is.
The word "differentiate" is used 4 times within the prompts in the Written Commentary. I encourage you to read all the prompts, paying special attention to the ones that ask about how you differentiate. Do a "search" for the word "differentiate" to find them quickly.
Hope this helps!
On 1/19/17, Brian wrote: > Hello everyone! I am working on component 2 and I'm > trying to get a feel for what type of differentiation is > expected. Do they want to see the same assignment > differentiated for different ability levels of students? Or > do they want to see students given different > assignments based on learning styles, preferences, etc? > Or do they want to see both? Thanks in advance for > your help.
If I pick 2 students (very different) Maybe one struggles with middle vowel students on her P.A. assessments and sight words (which affects her reading) and that also correspondences with their writing (they only write the beginning/ending sounds) I could make a goal to work on PA skills and sight words and then create a plan to help identify those items. From there, continue to do informative assessments and collect writing samples to see if those skills improve?? Then pick another student with a speech need, that struggles reading/writing simple CVC words because of speech issues. Then create a plan to identify those items and continue to collect writing samples??
On 1/17/17, A. Brandt wrote: > Wanted to get some feedback on this thought for EC Gen. > Component 2. > > Thanks > > If I pick 2 students (very different) Maybe one struggles > with middle vowel students on her P.A. assessments and > sight words (which affects her reading) and that also > correspondences with their writing (they only write the > beginning/ending sounds) I could make a goal to work on > PA skills and sight words and then create a plan to help > identify those items. From there, continue to do > informative assessments and collect writing samples to > see if those skills improve?? Then pick another student > with a speech need, that struggles reading/writing simple > CVC words because of speech issues. Then create a plan to > identify those items and continue to collect writing > samples?? > > Thoughts?? Thanks everyone
I feel like at least I have a plan to go with now!
On 1/17/17, What Works wrote: > Yes,Yes, Yes, and Yes. That's the idea. Choosing students > with very different needs is not only a good idea, it shows > that you know how to differentiate for different needs. > Sounds like a workable plan. :) > > > > > On 1/17/17, A. Brandt wrote: >> Wanted to get some feedback on this thought for EC > Gen. >> Component 2. >> >> Thanks >> >> If I pick 2 students (very different) Maybe one struggles >> with middle vowel students on her P.A. assessments and >> sight words (which affects her reading) and that also >> correspondences with their writing (they only write the >> beginning/ending sounds) I could make a goal to work on >> PA skills and sight words and then create a plan to help >> identify those items. From there, continue to do >> informative assessments and collect writing samples to >> see if those skills improve?? Then pick another student >> with a speech need, that struggles reading/writing simple >> CVC words because of speech issues. Then create a > plan to >> identify those items and continue to collect writing >> samples?? >> >> Thoughts?? Thanks everyone
I am working on Comp 4. I dont see a permission slip and wanted to make sure that I didn't miss anything on if we need parent permission for the 3 self assessments even though no names are used.
Thoughts on this one??? Could I use students MClass data as a part of this process? We are a Daily 5/CAFE school so a lot of our strategies work with TRC results (use those as my summative data??) and then I can use some of my conferencing data/progress monitoring as the formative assessment piece. We use a lot of Vertical Alignment, EC and Speech support during those time periods; I could use them as part of my collaborative piece. The parents have also been working on sight word/simple sentence challenges to help support the students reading ability. Would that work? OR should scratch that idea completely?
We are also getting ready to start an addition/subtraction unit (We have given a pre-assessment ) however we have not started instruction yet. So I would have some time to work through the process as we go. Thoughts??? Thanks
After taking a few months off and having gotten my scores for Comps 1, 2, & 3, I am now very motivated to push through the last component towards certification! I'm in the beginning stages and, so far, I have read through the comp instructions, the submission guide, have chosen my student population, and have started doing the basic research for the group that I chose - but I can't really figure out what the problem that I should address is and how I can relate that to my community, the science content and the PD that I have done for the last year or so... My idea was to address deficiencies in students to analyze data and to design 3 formative assessment and then test for growth by analyzing their summative assessment for that same unit, but how would I identify that particular deficiency with school records, or councilors, or through a parent survey? Essentially, I'm fishing for ideas and wondering what "needs" other physical science teachers out there are addressing for this component and how to connect the narrative thread to school data or parents. Any input would be super duper appreciated!
On 1/08/17, Steph wrote: > Help with formative assessment and self assessment! My > colleagues and I have mixed views on the requirements for > this. > > 1. Are the formative assessment and self assessment > separate entities? Do I need to submit a formative > assessment, then a separate self assessment? OR utilize > them simultaneously? >
You won't submit a self-assessment separate from the formative assessment - they are the same thing. So, for me, we did a lab demo followed by questions. Kids answered the questions on their own, then changes writing instruments, added to or modified their work based on group conversation, then changed writing instruments again and compared their work to my "gold standard" work. So what we do with the formative is the self-assessment.
> 2. Do the 3 student samples from the self assessment need > to be from the same lesson or different lessons? >
Same assessment is my understanding. I only say that because you include (or describe) the formative assessment, give the results/data, then three student samples. This feels very similar to what we did in Component 2, including using the samples as your evidence in the written commentary.
Just my thoughts... Lisa
> We are really stuck with these 2 aspects and do not want > to do them wrong. Thank you all very much for the help!!! > > > > >
Nevermind my previous post - I just read WhatWorks posted this in another string. Apparently you get to choose! > I'll try to supply some guidance to your questions. > > 1) The formative assessment IS NOT the self-assessment. > The formative assessment is an assessment YOU give at > one or more points DURING the unit you're teaching. The > self assessment is something the STUDENTS do that tells > you how THEY FEEL about what they're learning so far. > Both can inform your instruction but they are not the > same.Yes, you submit a formative assessment AND 3 > student self-assessments. > > 2) The NB directions don't really specify if the self > assessments should be from the same lesson (or point in > the unit of study) or can come from different points within > the unit lesson, so my interpretation is that it's YOUR > CHOICE. > > Some have also asked if the self-assessment themselves > have to be the same...i.e. all exit tickets, or all whatever > but the same. Again the directions don't specify that they > MUST be or CANNOT be so I interpret it as meaning it's > YOUR CHOICE. > > Hope that helps.
On 1/16/17, BioLisa wrote: > Hi Steph, > > Answers, as I understand them, embedded... > > On 1/08/17, Steph wrote: >> Help with formative assessment and self assessment! My >> colleagues and I have mixed views on the requirements for >> this. >> >> 1. Are the formative assessment and self assessment >> separate entities? Do I need to submit a formative >> assessment, then a separate self assessment? OR utilize >> them simultaneously? >> > > You won't submit a self-assessment separate from the > formative assessment - they are the same thing. So, for me, > we did a lab demo followed by questions. Kids answered the > questions on their own, then changes writing instruments, > added to or modified their work based on group > conversation, then changed writing instruments again and > compared their work to my "gold standard" work. So what we > do with the formative is the self-assessment. > > >> 2. Do the 3 student samples from the self assessment need >> to be from the same lesson or different lessons? >> > > Same assessment is my understanding. I only say that > because you include (or describe) the formative assessment, > give the results/data, then three student samples. This > feels very similar to what we did in Component 2, including > using the samples as your evidence in the written > commentary. > > Just my thoughts... > Lisa > > > >> We are really stuck with these 2 aspects and do not want >> to do them wrong. Thank you all very much for the help!!! >> >> >> >> >>
On 1/16/17, KP wrote: > I googled it and it specifically says that it is not > available for candidates for national board certification. > On 1/15/17, Lc wrote: >> >> Has anyone tried the ATLAS database through nbpts? I was > referred >> there by my professor - you have to purchase a >> subscription > but it >> promises access to videos and written pieces from nb >> teachers. >> >> On 1/01/17, Dahnya Chop wrote: >>> You are right. I don't think there any examples of >>> writing. I suggested copying and pasting the bold >>> questions into your rough draft. Then have someone else >>> read it to make sure that you are answering the >>> questions. Style doesn't matter. Answer the question in >>> detail and you may find yourself cutting words in the >>> end. I have to edit mine a lot to get it to make the >>> page total.
There isn't much out there to help with Component 1 beyond the Component 1 directions which really do explain a lot. From the NB website homepage, go to FOR TEACHERS> FIRST TIME AND RETURNING CANDIDATES. Here you'll find a matrix, click on your certificate area and open it up. Download it and print it so you have a hard copy. This document includes sample exercises.
The first section is called selected response - multiple choice questions. The second section is called constructed response : short answer/essay type questions. Study those diligently. They are all constructed the same.
Pay attention to the VERBS in the exercises: identify, explain, plan etc. Those tell you what you'll be asked to DO. Identify 2 misconceptions; plan 2 strategies to address the misconceptions etc. Do ONLY as instructed, Identify ONLY 2, or plan only 2 etc. There isn't time to add more. Once you see how they're set up, you can make up some exercises on your own,
Last, and most important, PRACTICE! Start with those sample constructed exercises, set a timer for 30 minutes and type away. Do this multiple times. You will get faster. Because the exercises you'll take are timed, doing this ahead of time will give you confidence and make you calmer.
There is a book available on Amazon that discusses C1. It's called What Works! Successful Strategies for Pursuing National Board Certification, Version 3.0, Components 1 and 2. There is also a book with the same title for Components 3 and 4. You might find a 24/7 resource valuable.
You won't see a lot about C1 on websites such as this until later in the spring. People are now working on the other components and won't think much about C1 until after they submit their work in May.
Good Luck!
On 1/15/17, Ms. Boss wrote: > I am currently signed up to take component 1 for the > National Boards. I need some assistance on where to get > resources and what should I expect.
Looking at the instructional context for component 3, it asks you to describe your social and physical context. Any ideas of what they are looking for?
On 1/15/17, Trisha wrote: > Looking at the instructional context for component 3, it > asks you to describe your social and physical context. > Any ideas of what they are looking for? > > TIA
Has anyone tried the ATLAS database through nbpts? I was referred there by my professor - you have to purchase a subscription but it promises access to videos and written pieces from nb teachers.
I'd say either/and/or...how's that for an answer! Both of those strategies are ways to differentiate. What do YOU do? Whatever it is, you'll explain what YOUR practice is.
The word "differentiate" is used 4 times within the prompts in the Written Commentary. I encourage you to read all the prompts, paying speci...See More