Therefore, I wanted to see if what I have planned out for comp 4 would work, because I am worried that although I explained my situation in the contextual information section, the assessors might find my goals to not be "worthwhile" as indicated by my feedback on comps 2 and 3.
For the group profile, I have chosen a 4th grade class of mixed ability. To develop a picture of the group I am using a student information survey I send to parents at the beginning of each year, my notes, behavioral contracts, last year's test scores, and a STEM interest survey conducted last year when they were in 3rd grade indicating that as a group they have lower interest in the STEM fields than other classes.
For the assessments I am using a unit on the physics of sound, which is connected to the group profile because the 3rd grade teachers emailed me saying that they did not get to their physical science unit on matter and energy, and sound and sound waves are not covered in 4th grade. The formative assessments are a pre-test to determine readiness and exit slips along with student self-reflections. The summative assessment is a series of three performance tasks where students demonstrate mastery and write brief explanations of how they completed each task.
For the student need I want to increase students' interest in STEM, which is why I'm using the survey they completed last year, and I will also have students complete the survey again this year. Hopefully, there will be a measurable difference.
For the professional need, I am attending a STEM conference, organizing a STEM Fair at my school (with the help of other teachers and parents), and held a school-wide assembly with a guest speaker from NASA.
I'm wondering if this all makes sense, and would be acceptable for fulfilling the requirements of comp 4? Does anyone have any suggestions for which things to include as evidence? Are there any adjustments I could make to ensure that this entry demonstrates worthwhile learning and growth in my students?
Sorry about the huge wall of text, and thanks for any help or feedback.
The various parts (Profile, Assessment, Student Need, Professional Need) CAN be connected but it's not required as far as I can see from language in the instructions. It looks like you have connected all of them and that should be fine.
Soldier on! :)
On 1/09/17, mcgen lab wrote: > I finished comps 1,2, and 3 last year and now am hard at > work on comp 4. However, I'm finding comp 4 very difficult > because I am a math/sci enrichment specialist (my district > has mandated that I am not supposed to teach or re- teach > content covered in students' self-contained classrooms, nor > am I supposed to do any remediation)I see all 3rd-5th grade > students 1 hour per week. > > Therefore, I wanted to see if what I have planned out for > comp 4 would work, because I am worried that although I > explained my situation in the contextual information > section, the assessors might find my goals to not be > "worthwhile" as indicated by my feedback on comps 2 and 3. > > For the group profile, I have chosen a 4th grade class of > mixed ability. To develop a picture of the group I am using > a student information survey I send to parents at the > beginning of each year, my notes, behavioral contracts, last > year's test scores, and a STEM interest survey conducted > last year when they were in 3rd grade indicating that as a > group they have lower interest in the STEM fields than other > classes. > > For the assessments I am using a unit on the physics of > sound, which is connected to the group profile because the > 3rd grade teachers emailed me saying that they did not get > to their physical science unit on matter and energy, and > sound and sound waves are not covered in 4th grade. The > formative assessments are a pre-test to determine readiness > and exit slips along with student self-reflections. The > summative assessment is a series of three performance tasks > where students demonstrate mastery and write brief > explanations of how they completed each task. > > For the student need I want to increase students' interest > in STEM, which is why I'm using the survey they completed > last year, and I will also have students complete the survey > again this year. Hopefully, there will be a measurable > difference. > > For the professional need, I am attending a STEM conference, > organizing a STEM Fair at my school (with the help of other > teachers and parents), and held a school-wide assembly with > a guest speaker from NASA. > > I'm wondering if this all makes sense, and would be > acceptable for fulfilling the requirements of comp 4? Does > anyone have any suggestions for which things to include as > evidence? Are there any adjustments I could make to ensure > that this entry demonstrates worthwhile learning and growth > in my students? > > Sorry about the huge wall of text, and thanks for any help > or feedback. > > > >
I am getting certified in technology and working on Component 4. I am having a difficult time just interpreting the directions, I don't even know what Component 4 is asking for. Feeling very frustrated. Why does everything have to be so ambiguous?
2...See MoreHello! Yes, this is confusing and when working alone, can be even more overwhelming. Here is what C4 is asking for:
1. You choose a group of students to profile. This will either be a class of students or a subgroup of students that you teach. Different certificates allow for different groups. Read your directions.
2. You teach a unit of study and during it, give a formative and summative assessment. After a formative assessment, you give your kids an opportunity to self-assess, then will choose 3 of those to submit.
3. You choose a Student Need that requires advocacy, collaboration, and/or leadership on your part to address. This could be with the same profile group you used for the Assessment piece OR could be another group. Read the directions for details.
4. You choose a Professional Need and show how you addressed it, and how it impacted your teaching practice and student learning. This could be a need generated by the profile group OR another group. Your directions explain. Also, this could be connected to either the Assessment piece, OR the Student Need, but could also stand alone.
All of these CAN be related to each other OR don't HAVE to be.
That's it in a nutshell. Another great place to find discussion is at proteacher.net. Lots of positive discussion there about C4. There are also books available on Amazon for this new process - all the components. Books are great for 24/7 access.
I urge you to get this straight in your head asap so you can start working on it. Some parts will need time to gather data etc. Waiting too long could be disastrous.
Good Luck!
n 1/09/17, Patricia A wrote: > On 1/05/17, Cm wrote: >> On 1/04/17, Kari wrote: >>> On 1/04/17, Kari wrote: >>>> At the moment, I am attempting to complete >> component >>>> 4 and component 1. I finished component 2 & component >>>> 3 last year. There is not a single person >> in my >>>> town that is taking or has their National Board cert. >>>> in Health. Therefore, I have no one to bounce ideas >>>> off >> of >>>> and this component is CONFUSING!!! If there is >> anyone >>>> taking component 4 currently and focusing on >> Health, I >>>> would love to chat! >> >> >> I am with along with another member of my department. We >> are middle school and only see the students for 6 weeks. >> I am trying to find some focus in the directions for >> Comp 4. I feel like it is asking for student growth, >> community involvement and professionalism but not sure >> where the student work samples come in. > > I am getting certified in technology and working on Component 4. I > am having a difficult time just interpreting the > directions, I don't even know what Component 4 is asking > for. Feeling very frustrated. Why does everything have to > be so ambiguous?
This is essentially the same question that's in the Instructional Context of C2. Context means situation or background. You are describing the social and physical circumstances of your class and your teaching situation that leads you to make the instructional choices you make.
So social context might be things like the class is chatty, active, competitive,multi-age, overcrowded etc. so when you plan your instruction you ___.
Physical context might include things such as being self- contained, room is very crowded, lacks technology (or has technology), spacious, located in a portable that's detached from the main building etc. etc. These things impact instructions decisions you make by ___?
I've mentioned only a few of the possibilities. YOUR contexts will be unique to you.
Hope this helps a bit.
On 1/07/17, Meghan wrote: > I'm having a hard time understanding what this > question means on the instructional context sheet. > > Describe the social and physical context that > influenced your instructional choices. > > Any help would be appreciated. > Thanks!
I have chosen a sophomore class for the knowledge of students, and the same sophomore class for the assessments which I will focus on an aspect of our writing curriculum.
I want to know how other people see the Participation in Learning Communities. I plan to talk about a learning team I worked on which focused on the same sophomore class, but it is about the approach to literature and not about writing.
Do you think writing about the same class but about a topic different from the focus of my assessments and knowledge of student sections is acceptable.
On 1/05/17, What Works wrote: > I think your plan is ok. I can find no language in the C4 > directions that either say the assessment and LC parts > MUST be connected or CAN'T be connected. My > interpretation is that this is the decision of the candidate. > They CAN or don't HAVE to be as far as I can tell. > > Hope that helps! > > > > On 1/05/17, NatiVol wrote: >> I am working on Component 4 for ELA/AYA. Sorry if this > has >> been covered and I missed it. >> >> I have chosen a sophomore class for the knowledge of >> students, and the same sophomore class for the > assessments >> which I will focus on an aspect of our writing > curriculum. >> >> I want to know how other people see the Participation > in >> Learning Communities. I plan to talk about a learning > team I >> worked on which focused on the same sophomore > class, but it >> is about the approach to literature and not about > writing. >> >> Do you think writing about the same class but about a > topic >> different from the focus of my assessments and > knowledge of >> student sections is acceptable. >> >> Thanks!
On 1/05/17, What Works wrote: > I think your plan is ok. I can find no language in the C4 > directions that either say the assessment and LC parts > MUST be connected or CAN'T be connected. My > interpretation is that this is the decision of the candidate. > They CAN or don't HAVE to be as far as I can tell. > > Hope that helps! > > > > On 1/05/17, NatiVol wrote: >> I am working on Component 4 for ELA/AYA. Sorry if this > has >> been covered and I missed it. >> >> I have chosen a sophomore class for the knowledge of >> students, and the same sophomore class for the > assessments >> which I will focus on an aspect of our writing > curriculum. >> >> I want to know how other people see the Participation > in >> Learning Communities. I plan to talk about a learning > team I >> worked on which focused on the same sophomore > class, but it >> is about the approach to literature and not about > writing. >> >> Do you think writing about the same class but about a > topic >> different from the focus of my assessments and > knowledge of >> student sections is acceptable. >> >> Thanks!
The first is a very low skilled population, so I have a ton of info on them from various sources. I can write quite a bit to describe them. However, we work at a very slow pace and the assessments I give are very straightforward and basic skills work. I am concerned that my assessments won't have enough depth for NB. I also am concerned about the quality of student's self- assessment that I would get.
The second is an Advanced level course, so very motivated, bright students. Because of the nature of these students I don't collaborate or gather as much info as with the lower group. However, we do some wonderful assessments and think I could get them to do a more quality job on their self-assessment.
Any insight into if there is a 'better' group to choose? Thanks!
Third year and still did not pass. I have received the Distinguished Educator 2/3 years but did not communicate my teaching to NBCT, yeah right. I worked with a grader for NBPTS in my cohort the first year and I wasn't on their radar for not passing but was never able to make up the lost points. What steps can we do to make this right?
You mention research you've done about the NBPTS scoring system being neither consistent nor fair. Could you please share that research - or give us a link to it so we could all see it?
Thanks!
Kelly M [email removed]
On 11/11/16, Martin wrote: > I recommend contacting your state's bar association to > begin the process of finding a lawyer or firm that has had > prior dealings with the NBPTS. Please consider posting the > results here. > > I've been researching just this issue and I'm finding > teachers all over the country who are claiming that the > NBPTS will not allow applicants to examine their results > and that NBPTS provides no proof that their scoring process > is fair or accurate. Even state bar exams are not this > rigid, and there may be a way force NBPTS's hand through a > class action lawsuit. At minimum, each applicant should > know exactly what they got wrong and why, with direct > evidence from their submissions and test questions. > > Given my research, it appears that the NBPTS scoring system > is neither consistent nor fair. >
Comp 1: Exercise 1: 4.000 Exercise 2: 4.000 Exercise 3: 4.000 Se...See MoreI have completed Comp 1-3 so far and this experience has been so tough at times, but I have already changes so much as a teacher! I was so nervous on Saturday (mostly because of my dismal Comp 2 score).....and my hard work paid off.....I got a 4!!!! So my scores are.......
Comp 1: Exercise 1: 4.000 Exercise 2: 4.000 Exercise 3: 4.000 Selected Response Items 3.294 Assessment Center Average Score: 3.824
Comp 2: 2.0
Comp 3: 4.0
I wish we knew the cutoff score so I could get an idea of what I need on Comp 4 to pass! I'm already working hard!
The various parts (Profile, Assessment, Student Need, Professional Need) CAN be connected but it's not required as far as I can see from language in the instructions. It looks like you have connect...See More