The organizer is meant to help candidates outline information about the various professional groups or learning communities in which they participate. So each heading:
NAME OF GROUP: Report Card Task Force; Student Study Team, Technology Team etc.
PURPOSE: Review present report card and present possible modifications; Assist teachers to find solutions to academic/behavior issues that impede learning; Research software to address student math deficiencies etc.
STRUCTURE: District committee; School grade level representatives, psychologist, principal, parent rep.; Grade-level/Subject matter PLC; Teacher/School - Community partnership
DATA SOURCES: District benchmark test scores, parent surveys, teacher testimonials, referral sheet, standardized assessment data, etc.
BENEFITS TO TEACHER/STUDENTS: This will be highly individual. You want to explain how this impacted student learning, your teaching practice etc. What improved? What changed? Be as specific as possible with numerical data, specific examples etc. Include rationales if appropriate.
These are just EXAMPLES...there are many, many more possibilities.
The information for each heading should give you the raw material you need to construct responses to the prompts.
Hope this helps!
On 1/01/17, Country Woman wrote: > What Works, > I purchased your updated book and I am using the Learning > Communities Organizer. Could you explain the organizer in > more detail? I understand what you're asking for in the > purpose, but unsure what the other terms mean. Thank you so > much for the book and your response. Also, do we only write > about one professional need? My goal was to get some of > Component 4 completed over Christmas Break, but I am still > grappling with understanding the directions!! >
Country WomanOn 1/02/17, What Works wrote: > Sure! (And BTW...thanks for the vote of confidence!) > > The organizer is meant to help candidates outline > information about the various professional groups or > learning communities in which they participate. So each > heading: > > NAME OF GROUP: Report Card Task Force; Student > Study T...See MoreOn 1/02/17, What Works wrote: > Sure! (And BTW...thanks for the vote of confidence!) > > The organizer is meant to help candidates outline > information about the various professional groups or > learning communities in which they participate. So each > heading: > > NAME OF GROUP: Report Card Task Force; Student > Study Team, Technology Team etc. > > PURPOSE: Review present report card and present > possible modifications; Assist teachers to find solutions > to academic/behavior issues that impede learning; > Research software to address student math deficiencies > etc. > > STRUCTURE: District committee; School grade level > representatives, psychologist, principal, parent rep.; > Grade-level/Subject matter PLC; Teacher/School - > Community partnership > > DATA SOURCES: District benchmark test scores, parent > surveys, teacher testimonials, referral sheet, standardized > assessment data, etc. > > BENEFITS TO TEACHER/STUDENTS: This will be highly > individual. You want to explain how this impacted > student learning, your teaching practice etc. What > improved? What changed? Be as specific as possible > with numerical data, specific examples etc. Include > rationales if appropriate. > > These are just EXAMPLES...there are many, many more > possibilities. > > The information for each heading should give you the raw > material you need to construct responses to the prompts. > > Hope this helps! > > > > > > > > > On 1/01/17, Country Woman wrote: >> What Works, >> I purchased your updated book and I am using the > Learning >> Communities Organizer. Could you explain the > organizer in >> more detail? I understand what you're asking for in the >> purpose, but unsure what the other terms mean. Thank > you so >> much for the book and your response. Also, do we only > write >> about one professional need? My goal was to get some > of >> Component 4 completed over Christmas Break, but I > am still >> grappling with understanding the directions!! >>
The National Board Certification process is not like university classes. It's more like an independent study project and they do put the burden and responsibility of figuring things out on the candidate. I agree this can be frustrating. I know I would have loved to have had some models to look at when I was a candidate. However, there are some very good reasons why the NB doesn't furnish them.
Believe it or not, humans are copy-cats - and teachers are humans. If we see a "model" then we think our work should look like that. But the problem is that there are approximately 10,000 candidates per year which means there are 10,000 individual teaching situations. No model could possibly be comprehensive enough to represent the variety of teaching contexts that exist. Trying to imitate a model can become very inauthentic. The prompts are written to elicit from EACH candidate, what is true for THEM.
That said, the NB provides some resources you may not have discovered. One important resource is the GENERAL PORTFOLIO INSTRUCTIONS. This document covers a myriad of topics - including some writing samples. From pages 16-39 are some writing samples along with explanations of the 3 types of writing one uses to respond to the prompts: descriptive, analytical, and reflective. Each of the samples showcase ONE of the types of writing. The underlined sentences represent the type of writing THAT sample shows. The samples aren't full or real writing examples, but they are of an Instructional Context, Planning, and Reflection similar to Component 2.
If you read them and do some analyzing of your own, you'll start to get a feel for how to write to address the prompts clearly, consistently, and convincingly. There is no way to know how they would score, if they were real, but I think one can assume that the NB has used appropriate quality writing for their samples.
There are also books on Amazon that give support to candidates and include writing tips such as sentence stems and other information to help candidates write well. Look in "Books" for National Board Certification and be sure to look for the NEW books that cover Components 1,2,3, and 4. There are older books available, but they focus on the old process, not the new one.
From time to time, I post messages with writing tips...I'll try to do that soon.
I hope you'll find some of the resources helpful.
On 1/01/17, NBC Hazing Experience wrote: > I will probably finish writing my component 2 entry in a few > days. My frustration is that I have never seen examples of > component 2 entries. When I went to university, I almost > always had examples of good writing for projects similar to > this. > > Does anyone know where I can find models of good writing for > component 2? The NBCT looks unprofessional by not providing > examples of good writing.
KellyOn 12/12/16, Meghan wrote: > On 12/12/16, I.Strat. wrote: >> I am looking for a study guide of any kind for comp. 1 >> Middle Child Generalist...any ideas? > > There isn't one... I bought the flash cards on eBay for this cert area. Mometrix I believe is the company.
I hope Kelly finds the flash cards helpful. I don't recom...See MoreActually there is one, but it isn't just for MCGens; it's for all certificate areas. It's called What Works! Successful Strategies for Pursuing National Board Certification; Version 3.0, Components 1 and 2. There is also a sequel for Components 3 and 4. Both are available on Amazon.
I hope Kelly finds the flash cards helpful. I don't recommend them to my candidates. I've seen them and don't feel they address the content of the assessment - and they are expensive. My opinion.
Good Luck!
On 12/31/16, Kelly wrote: > On 12/12/16, Meghan wrote: >> On 12/12/16, I.Strat. wrote: >>> I am looking for a study guide of any kind for comp. 1 >>> Middle Child Generalist...any ideas? >> >> There isn't one... > I bought the flash cards on eBay for this cert area. Mometrix > I believe is the company.
After taking a few months off and having gotten my scores for Comps 1, 2, & 3, I am now very motivated to push through the last component towards certification! I'm in the beginning stages and, so far, I have read through the comp instructions, the submission guide, have chosen my student population, and have started doing the basic research for the group that I chose - but I can't really figure out what the problem that I should address is and how I can relate that to my community, the science content and the PD that I have done for the last year or so... My idea was to address deficiencies in students to analyze data and to design 3 formative assessment and then test for growth by analyzing their summative assessment for that same unit, but how would I identify that particular deficiency with school records, or councilors, or through a parent survey? Essentially, I'm fishing for ideas and wondering what "needs" other physical science teachers out there are addressing for this component and how to connect the narrative thread to school data or parents. Any input would be super duper appreciated!
I'm overwhelmed with the instructions for component 4. I read it several times but I think I need someone to really help me understand what I really need to do.
What is the difference between the Professional Need Form and the Student Need Form? In the old NBCT most of the candidates utilized after- school tutoring program. Do you think this is needed for Component 4 or whatever you're doing in the classroom is enough? Do you have any ideas and tips on how to include other community members that will have an impact on students' learning? Thank you so much!
On 11/16/16, emc19 wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I'm overwhelmed with the instructions for component > 4. I read it several times but I think I need someone to > really help me understand what I really need to do. > > What is the difference between the Professional Need > Form and the Student Need Form? > In the old NBCT most of the candidates utilized after- > school tutoring program. Do you think this is needed > for Component 4 or whatever you're doing in the > classroom is enough? Do you have any ideas and tips > on how to include other community members that will > have an impact on students' learning? > Thank you so much!
On 11/17/16, ...See MoreI am in complete agreement. Have you had any "Aha" moments since this post? I am also emc literacy, and I am not sure what to make of this component right now. I am also currently undertaking component 3 which has me wondering if I should wait and tackle 4 next year? Advice on that (if you have already completed 3?)
On 11/17/16, Biophysteach wrote: > Completely different subject area, but I agree! Component 2 > and 3 kind of had one main goal you were working towards, this > component seems like so many disconnected parts that you have > to throw in to one written commentary...no idea where to start. > > On 11/16/16, emc19 wrote: >> Hello everyone! >> >> I'm overwhelmed with the instructions for component >> 4. I read it several times but I think I need someone to >> really help me understand what I really need to do. >> >> What is the difference between the Professional Need >> Form and the Student Need Form? >> In the old NBCT most of the candidates utilized after- >> school tutoring program. Do you think this is needed >> for Component 4 or whatever you're doing in the >> classroom is enough? Do you have any ideas and tips >> on how to include other community members that will >> have an impact on students' learning? >> Thank you so much!
As Rebecca says, flow isn't the point. The prompts are designed to elicit info that will let the assessors see if your teaching incorporates the Architecture of Accomplished Teaching - the NB version of an accomplished lesson plan. It's the red helix graphic found in e GENERAL Portfolio Instructions. Here is an acronym for the steps SSTARS:
S = Students S = Set goals T= Teach A= Assess R= Reflect S = Start over ( set new goals)
It isn't rocket science, but it is a different way of writing than we're used to. GOOD LUCK!
On 12/29/16, La'Toya wrote: > On 12/28/16, Rhonda wrote: >> On 12/25/16, La'Toya wrote: >>> I am having a really hard time beginning my component 2. >>> Any suggestions on how to begin with the writing? >> >> I just got my scores back for Component 2 and I scored 4.0. >> Find the list of questions and just answer them. The paper >> will not "flow" as you answer them and some of the >> information will be repeated BUT just answer the questions >> in the order they are listed! They are grading it based on > how >> you answer the questions so make it easy for them to follow >> the question format so they don't have to skip around to > find >> the answers. Also, restate the question in your answer > (i.e. >> "What student did you choose?" would be "The student I >> chose is Rebecca.") I hope this helps! > Thank you so much Rhonda. That helps.
On 12/28/16, Curious wrote: > On 12/14/16, s wrote: >> On 12/13/16, Ohsque wrote: >>> My Comp 1 scores are: >>> ex1- 3.0 >>> ex2- 1.0 >>> ex3- 3.0 >>> SRI- 2.975 >>> >>> average- 2.494 >>> >>> I am assuming I have met the 1.75 requirement- but >>> am I in okay standing as I begin the other >>> components? >> >> Thought I would add that I have already ordered to >> retake exercise 2, to pull that score up.... :) >> > What was the charge to just re-do Exercise 2?
More so, confusion in the later part of the sente...See MoreI am reading over component 4 and I am confused in the overview section on page 1 where it says, "Provide evidence of contact with: counselors, families, caregivers, the community, teachers and of my contributions to learning communities to advance students’ leaning and growth."
More so, confusion in the later part of the sentence and how that ties into my assessment as a whole.
I sent out an end-of-semester "check in" survey to both students and parents to gather any feedback/information that had for me moving forward that I plan to use. Also, emails between parents/myself and special ed/myself throughout first semester and from here on out I will use.
allieOn 12/15/16, Paige wrote: > On 12/15/16, Dahnya Chop wrote: >> On 12/14/16, Allie wrote: >>> I am reading over component 4 and I am confused in the >>> overview section on page 1 where it says, "Provide > evidence >>> of contact with: counselors, families, caregivers, the >>> community, teachers ...See MoreOn 12/15/16, Paige wrote: > On 12/15/16, Dahnya Chop wrote: >> On 12/14/16, Allie wrote: >>> I am reading over component 4 and I am confused in the >>> overview section on page 1 where it says, "Provide > evidence >>> of contact with: counselors, families, caregivers, the >>> community, teachers and of my contributions to learning >>> communities to advance students’ leaning and growth." >>> >>> More so, confusion in the later part of the sentence and >>> how that ties into my assessment as a whole. >> >> I had students set up a conference time with their parents > in >> which they shared work from first semester, disussed their >> accomplishments and goals for second semester. In the class >> that I am using for component 4 there are students with > IEPs and >> 504s, so I can work with those teachers as well. > > > I sent out an end-of-semester "check in" survey to both > students and parents to gather any feedback/information that > had for me moving forward that I plan to use. Also, emails > between parents/myself and special ed/myself throughout first > semester and from here on out I will use.
**wonderful!** I still need to dive in further to the details of the directions, but do we need to show proof of the emails between parents and parent meetings, or will proof like that just be described.
Hopefully one of those ideas will work or someone else will come to your rescue with an idea that worked for them. GOOD LUCK!
On 12/25/16, Holly wrote: > Hi! I am getting ready to begin collecting writing samples > for component 2. I have a question about the samples > and 1 page max. I teach Kindergarten, and the students > use the picture/writing paper with the large handwriting > lines. Usually their writing flows over to 2 pages for a > complete sample. What kind of paper do you use that is > appropriate for their level (aka handwriting lines), but fits > into the 1 page max limitations? I don't want to submit > half of a sample bc of a page limit. Thank you!
The organizer is meant to help candidates outline information about the various professional groups or learning communities in which they participate. So each heading:
NAME OF GROUP: Report Card Task Force; Student Study Team, Technology Team etc.
PURPOSE: Review presen...See More