I have been looking at what the best countries do in the world in the areas of math, reading and science literacy. Finland is at the top of any list when it comes to literacy in all areas. The one thing that struck me more than anything else was the lack of annual testing and measures that is so characteristic of our country. Years ago United State...See MoreI have been looking at what the best countries do in the world in the areas of math, reading and science literacy. Finland is at the top of any list when it comes to literacy in all areas. The one thing that struck me more than anything else was the lack of annual testing and measures that is so characteristic of our country. Years ago United States was at the top of the heap when literacy rates were spoken of. Then with the introduction of annual testing and other measures of success we started to drop. Now depending on what list you look at we are either 11th or 15th depending on the day of the week. NCLB practices are in direct opposition to the practices of the best school systems in the world. I spend two weeks at the beginning of the year with benchmark tests and two weeks at the end of the year with benchmark tests again. We can't teach because we are constantly measuring progress. We teach to a narrowly defined measure of what intelligence is. We don't realize that not everyone learns at the same rate nor that is everyone really destined to go to college. We try to send unsuitable candidates to colleges. These students take out huge student loans and then are unable to pay the loans back when they drop out after not being able to keep up with the demands of a college education. NCLB is a horrible failure and the legacy will be a horribe mess.
JoOn 4/10/11, ja wrote: > I have been looking at what the best countries do in the > world in the areas of math, reading and science literacy. > Finland is at the top of any list when it comes to literacy > in all areas. The one thing that struck me more than > anything else was the lack of annual testing and measures > that is so c...See MoreOn 4/10/11, ja wrote: > I have been looking at what the best countries do in the > world in the areas of math, reading and science literacy. > Finland is at the top of any list when it comes to literacy > in all areas. The one thing that struck me more than > anything else was the lack of annual testing and measures > that is so characteristic of our country. Years ago United > States was at the top of the heap when literacy rates were > spoken of. Then with the introduction of annual testing > and other measures of success we started to drop. Now > depending on what list you look at we are either 11th or > 15th depending on the day of the week. NCLB practices are > in direct opposition to the practices of the best school > systems in the world. I spend two weeks at the beginning > of the year with benchmark tests and two weeks at the end > of the year with benchmark tests again. We can't teach > because we are constantly measuring progress. We teach to > a narrowly defined measure of what intelligence is. We > don't realize that not everyone learns at the same rate nor > that is everyone really destined to go to college. We try > to send unsuitable candidates to colleges. These students > take out huge student loans and then are unable to pay the > loans back when they drop out after not being able to keep > up with the demands of a college education. NCLB is a > horrible failure and the legacy will be a horribe mess.
I watched what our local schools did with the introduction of state test which were prior to NCLB. At first the schools did nothing. The test was blamed for poor results. The test was tweaked and the results were still poor. Then came NCLB. The school still did exactly the same thing for a few years and blamed the test. THEN when it looked like accountablity was coming down the pipeline, instead of improving instruction and how the students were taught information they worked on ways to game the tests, not teach the material for better understanding.
Part of the failure for NCLB is that the student's instruction didn't become better, but worse because instead of coming up with ways to teach better, they gamed the tests.
On 4/14/11, tp wrote: > I find it ironic that people who founded NCLB probably > didn't even attend kinderagarten, didn't have all the > standardized tests, limited accountability yet are making a > huge salary, got educated, learned to read and write just > fine and there was wonderful amount of funding for > schools. HMMMMM funny isn't how now we think we have to > have all these rules and regulations to help kids learn. > What a joke. Where is common cents. I also love it when > our Governors give themselves raises but cut education. No > money for you, who cares that you are the foundation of our > country. It all starts with education but we don't believe > in funding it. I am so sick and tired of political BS. > Give money so we can help kids, give us nurses, counselors > and more staff back so we can take care of these kids.
I now believe that all this testing leads to only one things. High stakes cheating. My state had their annual tests today. I have two students who have extended time for testing. They had their writing test today but have to have the test complete by the end of the day. The students cannot leave the campus for the duration of the testing. One stude...See MoreI now believe that all this testing leads to only one things. High stakes cheating. My state had their annual tests today. I have two students who have extended time for testing. They had their writing test today but have to have the test complete by the end of the day. The students cannot leave the campus for the duration of the testing. One student left at lunchtime with his mom and I am quite sure that the mother coached him on what to say. When the student came back I told him that "sorry" you knew the rules but left. Test is done. Principal stepped in and said let him finish in my office. I went along but filed an incident report with the test coordinator. The second child did not finish his test on Monday. Went home and told mom that after he thought about test realized he left details out. She called principal and I was told that the child could finish the test today. Principal has not been on property this week. This time I did not let the child redo the test. I stood my ground and refused to proceed. I also filed another incident report. We stand up before these kids everyday and preach about what is doing right yet we deliberately let the kids cheat. I am disgusted and ready to leave this profession. I am in a state where morals and values are extremely rare to begin with. Totally defeated and disgusted at this point. Thanks for letting me vent.What have we come to? Does this teach anything? This is only the tip I am quite sure of what has gone on in this building.
jwOn 4/15/11, sped teacher wrote: > I now believe that all this testing leads to only one > things. High stakes cheating. My state had their annual > tests today. I have two students who have extended time > for testing. They had their writing test today but have to > have the test complete by the end of the day. The students > cann...See MoreOn 4/15/11, sped teacher wrote: > I now believe that all this testing leads to only one > things. High stakes cheating. My state had their annual > tests today. I have two students who have extended time > for testing. They had their writing test today but have to > have the test complete by the end of the day. The students > cannot leave the campus for the duration of the testing. > One student left at lunchtime with his mom and I am quite > sure that the mother coached him on what to say. When the > student came back I told him that "sorry" you knew the > rules but left. Test is done. Principal stepped in and > said let him finish in my office. I went along but filed > an incident report with the test coordinator. The second > child did not finish his test on Monday. Went home and > told mom that after he thought about test realized he left > details out. She called principal and I was told that the > child could finish the test today. Principal has not been > on property this week. This time I did not let the child > redo the test. I stood my ground and refused to proceed. > I also filed another incident report. We stand up before > these kids everyday and preach about what is doing right > yet we deliberately let the kids cheat. I am disgusted and > ready to leave this profession. I am in a state where > morals and values are extremely rare to begin with. > Totally defeated and disgusted at this point. Thanks for > letting me vent.What have we come to? Does this teach > anything? This is only the tip I am quite sure of what has > gone on in this building.
Our students take the MAP test 3 times/year. We just finished #3 this week and some teachers are having kids take it over because they don't feel their kids "put forth their best effort." Is anyone else seeing this? Should the ethics of it be questioned?
This alarms me! Yes, the ethics of it s...See MoreOn 5/11/11, Jo wrote: > Our students take the MAP test 3 times/year. We just > finished #3 this week and some teachers are having kids > take it over because they don't feel their kids "put forth > their best effort." Is anyone else seeing this? Should the > ethics of it be questioned?
This alarms me! Yes, the ethics of it should be questioned!!! At my school, the tests are kept locked up until it is time to take the test in April. Teachers never see the test and strict rules are used as provided in our training. Each teacher has a proctor to make sure no cheating is done!
On 5/30/11, Julie wrote: > On 5/11/11, Jo wrote: >> Our students take the MAP test 3 times/year. We just >> finished #3 this week and some teachers are having kids >> take it over because they don't feel their kids "put forth >> their best effort." Is anyone else seeing this? Should the >> ethics of it be questioned? > > This alarms me! Yes, the ethics of it should be questioned!!! > At my school, the tests are kept locked up until it is time to > take the test in April. Teachers never see the test and > strict rules are used as provided in our training. Each > teacher has a proctor to make sure no cheating is done!
Clip to ScrapBook #1 I am in a group taking a college course entitled Making Learning Meaningful, Every Student Can Succeed. It is based on the beliefs and books of Dr. William Glasser. He believes in Choice Theory and the concept of the only person you can control is yourself. He believes that in education that schools should eliminate C, D, and F grades. Students should only be given credit for competent and quality work (B, A, A+). He believes almost all students are capable of performing at this level. The alternative to giving these lower grades of C, D, and F, is to keep giving back work to be student corrected until they reach a competent level. In order to complete this assignment, we need teacher input on how they think this would or does work in their classroom and school.
What grading system do you use now?
Do you think eliminating C, D, and F grades is feasible in your school?
Yeah, ok, so I give the kid a second, third, or thirteenth chance to redo the work he or she should have buckled down, paid attention, and done his best on the FIRST time.
Meanwhile, all the students who did what they were supposed to do, and got good grades the FIRST time, have all gotten their corrected papers back.
So what's to stop the slacker/procrastinator/chronic disruptor from annoying the other students with, "Hey, you got your paper back? Let me see it!" and copying the whole thing? (Copying is pretty chronic at out school. LOL...when I see kids in English class copying math or history homework, I always let the math or history teacher know about it, too. That way, the students realize pretty quickly that they need to be doing English work in English class, because it's not a safe place to be copying work for their other classes! But I can't control what they do once they leave the room.)
And btw, if we're giving the problem students all these "second chances," what message does it send to the quiet, studious kids who do pay attention and do get their work in on time? What's the payoff for them in meeting their school deadlines if the deadlines ultimately mean nothing?
Finally, I'm not into staying up until a million o'clock the night before report cards are due so I can grade a WHOLE six weeks of make-up/fake-up work to "save" the kids who have probably jerked around and made a lot of noise and interrupted the class for six weeks and made it more difficult for the serious students to learn.
The "No D's, no F's" plan is wrong on so many levels it's almost funny. Damned if I'd ever take a job in a place with such a fouled up policy.
One student wrote a negative comment about the class on an exam and a class clown wrote "I don't like the class. I don't understand anything. I just want a 20." on my end of the year evaluations. Beyond that, I was a rock star and literally nicknamed "rock star". Was I perfect? NO! NO! NO! My title did in fact come about because I was too nice and my classroom management skills were/still are not 100% there.
But I gave bad grades and I was still well loved.
Bonus: One good student said my class was the English class she'd understood the best and so she'd been able to make her first 20/20 ever in English.
Even kids with 15/16 grades knew they'd worked to get the grade and my 18-20 kids were really really excited to get a good grade in a hard class.
Kids that failed my class learned something. I had one who just didn't do anything at all and got 8/20, but others left my class having learned something.
Requiring teachers to push all students to a B is insane.
One of my worst college memories is a class where I spent half of fall break doing the presentation that was the bulk of the grade and then yes getting 100 BUT seeing students who admitted they threw their presentation together in the car on the way to class--while driving :)-- get 100, too. Most education teachers slap 100% on all work so I stopped giving a sh*t about the assignments and just did them as fast as possible.
On 7/27/11, VetTeach wrote: > This might work if you have one key element- TIME. You have to > permit the student time to re-do until it is at the level you > seek. No one has that time - we are under the gun of a calendar > and a course of study. So, the theory is good but it will not > work until educrats want it to happen.
On 6/15/11, Chelsea Wilson wrote: > Hello, > If anyone has the time to take a survey for my graduate > project, I would greatly appreciate it! > Part 1 survey - > > [link removed];
Recently I have noticed an upswing of alternative licensed teachers in classrooms. To me this goes against the times as instead of a teacher shortage we are experiencing a teaching job shortage for those that decided on the traditional route.. What are your thoughts and opinions of alternative routes?
O...See MoreToday’s work force changes career paths more than ever. A teacher has every right to switch careers to become a nurse, so a business person has every right to become a teacher. I think alternative certification is great, as long as the hiring is ethical and a good teacher isn’t passed up for a football coach who needs a teaching job.
On 7/15/12, Chris wrote: > Recently I have noticed an upswing of alternative licensed > teachers in classrooms. To me this goes against the times > as instead of a teacher shortage we are experiencing a > teaching job shortage for those that decided on the > traditional route.. What are your thoughts and opinions of > alternative routes?
By employing the strategies described below, reading will become something that students do willingly, even eagerly, and the adults in their lives will not have to resort to trickery, bribery, manipulation, or any other tactic that will, at best, lead to temporary compliance. After all, we’re striving to make reading a joyous lifelong habit.