teacherDistricts have huge piles of applications and there is no way that they could interview everyone. In my area, principals chose their teachers, not the district , and they can't hire someone they don't know. Is there really an opening at the school you are interested in? Then send your resume to the principal and request an interview. But if they tr...See MoreDistricts have huge piles of applications and there is no way that they could interview everyone. In my area, principals chose their teachers, not the district , and they can't hire someone they don't know. Is there really an opening at the school you are interested in? Then send your resume to the principal and request an interview. But if they truly need a bilingual teacher, that is legit. I don't believe in bilingual education, but it is legal and mandatory- to the point that some districts have to go out of the country to hire. Attitude counts for a lot in an interview, so be sure to project your most positive self and don't even mention the hispanic thing ever - they will think you are prejudiced. You might want to have someone proof read your application and letters also. There ARE only two reasons. Contact those principals and good luck! On 3/31/09, Adele wrote: > I'm trying to get a teacher's aide or Clerk at this TX > elementary school and I didn't even get an interview. I > turned my application in at the business office about 2 > months ago. There is only 2 reasons that I didn't get an > interview: The people didn't even turn it in or I don't > speak Spanish. I have a Bachelor's degree and I have > experience in teaching. I know the TX law is that you must > have 2 years of college to be an aide and I know that the > schools around my area have aides that don't have that. > And they are all Hispanic. I know the schools will deny > that the reason that were hired is because they were > Hispanic. In a previous school I applied at I have a > friend that does not have any college experience and they > hired her as an aide. I'm sorry I'm so frustrated at this > school!!
ZodeaOur local school district has you fill out an application then send a separate letter of interest for each specific job opening you want to apply for. Did you apply for that specific job or just give them a resume?
What materials in the subject areas of social studies and science are you using to meet the needs of those in tier 2 for content and comprehension practice?
I was wondering what people were using to test fluency? Our district has used this for the last two years - but doing it in fourth grade is just a waste of time for all!! There must be something out there that does this, but gives the teacher some information to drive instruction. Any suggestions?
T.CherryOn 7/09/09, Marie/IN wrote: > We use STEEPS to test fluency in grades 2-5. It is > administered by our school psych. Hello, This is my first time chatting, a little confused> I am a student at East Carolina University, in NC. I am suppose to chat with someone concerning the lates issues in Elementary Eduaction. Is anyone there?
Fontus an...See MoreLooking for suggestions of programs to use at the fourth grade level to determine reading levels. My district so far has tried:
DRA2 - seemed to be more of a writing test, but not the same type as required on our state test, time consuming when doing a whole class, and had a huge jump in expectations from third to fourth
Fontus and Pinnel (spelling? sorry) - seems to easy to have the outcome differ from teacher to teacher with all of the listening of the comprehension, by fourth grade the students need to be writing at least some since that is what is on the state test
So what are some programs you have used that you feel does a good job at the 4-6 grade levels?
I haven't been in school for 5 years. How do I study for the test? I bought the cliff notes and am now looking at the standards. What does test 3 cover on the actual cset? Should I focus more on art or p.e or child development?
by in Philly on May 16 this weekend , NYC in June, and many other cities around rhe country teachers ha
May 14, 2009
Don't miss a chance to help rewrite NCLB. This weekend in Philly, in June in NYC and many other cities this year. Stop chatting and get your thoughts and advice on paper as part of a historical document that will change the world of education. Details are at [link removed].
At the top of the pile sre the gifted students, the students with the most potential and the students who have the best chance of being our movers and shakers in this upcoming generation. All research shows that gifted students need smaller classes where they receive continual motivation, encouragement, correction, refocusing, and original thinking time. In my state, Georgia, the class limit for gifted used to be 21 students. In practice this worked very well, giving the teacher the flexibility to work individually with students in an environment conducive to the learning potential of the students. Georgia, due to the financial crisis we all face, increased the minimum class size for gifted students to 23. My school district took an even more dramatic approach. They eliminated the minimum size for gifted classes. Some schools have chosen to follow this standard, some have chosen 28 as a minimum, and my school has decided upon 25 students. All of the situations seriously impact gifted education and, in the process, have reduced the level of service to gifted students by their teachers. There is less time and potential for individual extensions and remediation to enhance the learning of highly intelligent students who will potentially be our future business and political leaders, our engineers, our scientists, our doctors and nurses, and our artists. Why? All because of the emphasis NCLB places on the bottom of the pile. One school in my district has even eliminated gifted science completely, while the current administration's priority in teaching is science and math. How can that be justified by this school?
Gifted education is in serious peril as long as NCLB exists, and regular ed students suffer even more as all the emphasis is on testing, testing, and more testing. In addition, the lock-step policies of schools to ensure that specific information is taught at a specific time to match the timing of the abhorent tests takes away all teacher flexibility and innovation. NCLB must be eliminated and the education community needs to come to its senses.
You're lucky that it's just "seriously impacted" the gifted program. In Illinois, most of those programs are long gone. You can still find some sputtering gifted programs in the wealthiest districts that chose to fund them on their own, but state funding went away for those programs several years ago.
All the emphasis in NCLB is on the bottom of > the pile. All the smaller classes are focused on the > bottom of the pile.
It depends on where you are. I'm a Special Ed administrator. While state and federal law requires a certain level of service. However, most of my kids are written off by High School because they are not going to pass the ACT/PSAE, which is our state AYP test. It's a college acceptance test and we're giving to to kids who read at the 4th grade level. Yeah, more than 90% of our kids with IEPs don't meet standards every year.
> The middle learners, the majority of > the students we teach are packed into the largest classes, > receive much less intervention and extension in the > classroom and suffer under NCLB.
Now my experience has been that any discretionary spending has been spent on them. The lower end students, both sped and non-sped have been written off. The higher end students are going to meet or exceed state standards anyway, so they don't get much, but the middle kids are the ones you can impact. So, it's drill-baby-drill to do well on the test... and not much else. It doesn't matter if the kids don't know there was a World War II, as long as they have the vocab and reading skills to pass the test.
In any event, I think we can agree that NCLB is terrible. It's an attempt by non-education people to quantify something unquantifiable like education. The Bush Administration was very business minded. They wanted to look at education like a business and quantify learning into something concrete, like percentages. So, School A is fine because X% are meeting/exceeding AYP standards, and School B is doing poorly because Y% are not meeting standards. Easy, simple.... but wrong.
Also, NCLB was an attempt to subvert money to private, RELIGIOUS schools, which the Right-wingers who wrote the bill love. Ultimately, they'd love to send their wealthy, Christian, mostly-white children to a Christian school with other white Christians and have it paid for with a government voucher. Then public schools can become the "Medicaid" or County Hospitals of education. A place for poor, mostly-brown people to learn how to operate a cash register or lawn mower and receive basic, sub-par education. This is the ultimate goal of NCLB.
The quality of middle > learner education has seriously eroded as the time goes by > with us strapped by NCLB. > > At the top of the pile sre the gifted students, the > students with the most potential and the students who have > the best chance of being our movers and shakers in this > upcoming generation. All research shows that gifted > students need smaller classes where they receive continual > motivation, encouragement, correction, refocusing, and > original thinking time. In my state, Georgia, the class > limit for gifted used to be 21 students. In practice this > worked very well, giving the teacher the flexibility to > work individually with students in an environment conducive > to the learning potential of the students. Georgia, due to > the financial crisis we all face, increased the minimum > class size for gifted students to 23. My school district > took an even more dramatic approach. They eliminated the > minimum size for gifted classes. Some schools have chosen > to follow this standard, some have chosen 28 as a minimum, > and my school has decided upon 25 students. All of the > situations seriously impact gifted education and, in the > process, have reduced the level of service to gifted > students by their teachers. There is less time and > potential for individual extensions and remediation to > enhance the learning of highly intelligent students who > will potentially be our future business and political > leaders, our engineers, our scientists, our doctors and > nurses, and our artists. Why? All because of the emphasis > NCLB places on the bottom of the pile. One school in my > district has even eliminated gifted science completely, > while the current administration's priority in teaching is > science and math. How can that be justified by this school? > > Gifted education is in serious peril as long as NCLB > exists, and regular ed students suffer even more as all the > emphasis is on testing, testing, and more testing. In > addition, the lock-step policies of schools to ensure that > specific information is taught at a specific time to match > the timing of the abhorent tests takes away all teacher > flexibility and innovation. NCLB must be eliminated and > the education community needs to come to its senses.
Sadly, the direction education continues to take is quite dismal. Outs...See MoreThe Obama administration's 'Race to the Top' has taken a bad thing- No Child Left Behind- and has made it a great deal worse. Interestingly, what the left is pushing, in terms of education, is the same rhetoric that the right used -blame teachers and teach to the test.
Sadly, the direction education continues to take is quite dismal. Outsiders - politicians and business people who know nothing about children and learning - are the ones setting educational policy. Public schools are rapidly becoming Kaplan test prep centers.
MarinaOn 6/15/09, MS BROWN wrote: > I TRULY BELIEVE THAT NCLB IS A DIS-SERVICE TO THE EDUCATION > COMMUNITY. PARTICULARLY THOSE IN SPECIAL EDUCATION. I > BELIEVE THAT CHILDREN W/ DISABILITIES ARE ALREADY > STRUGGLING WITH LIMITATIONS AND BOUNDARIES THAT ARE > INTERNAL AND TO BE BOMBARDED WITH EXPECTATIONS THAT SEEM TO > BE SET UP FOR TH...See MoreOn 6/15/09, MS BROWN wrote: > I TRULY BELIEVE THAT NCLB IS A DIS-SERVICE TO THE EDUCATION > COMMUNITY. PARTICULARLY THOSE IN SPECIAL EDUCATION. I > BELIEVE THAT CHILDREN W/ DISABILITIES ARE ALREADY > STRUGGLING WITH LIMITATIONS AND BOUNDARIES THAT ARE > INTERNAL AND TO BE BOMBARDED WITH EXPECTATIONS THAT SEEM TO > BE SET UP FOR THEIR FAILURE IS SO DISCOURAGING FOR THEM. I > KNOW ALL CHILDREN MUST LEARN AND ALL CHILDREN LEARN > DIFFERENTLY. I ALSO KNOW THAT DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IS > HELPFUL. HOWEVER, WHEN THESE LEARNING DISABLED STUDENTS AND > IN SOME CASES VISUALLY IMPAIRED AS WELL AS MULTIPLELY > DISABLED STUDENTS ARE EXPECTED TO LEARN AND PRODUCE THE > SAME CONTENT AS "REGULAR" STUDENTS; IT IS TRULY A PROBLEM. > NOT ONLY A PROBLEM FOR STUDENTS, BUT FOR THE TEACHERS AND > ADMINISTRATORS IN DISTRICTS THAT SUFFER FOR THE LACK OF > PROFICIENCY IN THESE CLASSROOMS. > I COULD GO ON AND SAY MUCH MORE; HOWEVER, IT IS MY HOPE > THAT AMERICA WILL FIND A WAY TO ENRICH THE LIVES OF ALL > LEARNERS SO THAT CREATIVITY IS FOSTERED AND LEARNING IS AN > ART OF LOVING.
I agree. Our school, and many others in my district, didn't make AYP because of the disabled children. Well, I can only imagine the pressure that will be put on the poor ESE teachers and ESE children next year. Who exactly decided what they "should" know, anyhow? NCLB should be based on the improvement students make, not on reaching a magic number on a test.