It is perfectly acceptable to be used as a part of the grade. The AR company has guidelines for that. It's especially used in middle & high schools as a grade. It's more commonly used as a rewards-based program in elementary schools.
You are misinformed of the purpose of the program. If the school is really using it that way, then they lack training in the proper use.
Our students benefit greatly from AR when it is used properly. The problem is that it should not just be for extra credit. Students should receive a grade for their % of goal and their total % correct. Most students on a 3rd grade reading level or higher should read at least 9 books per 9 weeks (less if they're reading longer/ higher point level books). It is fair to say that the higher their STAR reader results for grade equivalency, the higher level books they should be required to read, so they may only read 3 books during the 9 weeks. I had one girl reading Les Miserables in 7th grade and she took the whole quarter, but it was 100 pt book, perfect for her 13+ reading level. AR gives a prime opportunity differentiation. The key is in understanding a few concepts: "scaffolding" (some of my students need reading packets to support their journey through a book...I get mine from Edhelper.com, whereas others are good with a reading log that gives room for text interaction on a multiple times per day basis). "guided independant reading" (the teacher has to keep his/her finger on the pulse by monitoring closely what each student is reading, how long it takes, whether or not the reading log or packet is being completed in a timely manner, and use the awesome reports that AR gives each teacher access to. I check my students numbers weekly). I encourage students to read in 12 minute bursts unless they really get into it & can't put it down. To that end they have a 12 minute warmup of AR time. During that time I conference with students on a rotating schedule so I can regularly check their progress, ask questions, conduct fluency checks. My students range from a 2.3 reading level to 13+ in the 7th grade. Without AR, many would either be bored or lost. AR validates all of them where they are and they can apply the literary skills I teach and model via whole class 7th grade level instruction, with their own independent reading. It's like going to the gym and working with a trainer. The trainer shows you how to do it, then one on one helps you do it at your level. Then you do it on your own at your level and when you do it again with the trainer, you're a little bit closer to doing it as good as the trainer. Slowly but surely they make it. My numbers speak for themselves. Without AR it was like playing Russian Roulette as to what my scores on end of the year tests would be like. With AR, I grew along with my students, in my understanding of what it mean to scaffold, guide, & direct. Principles want to see direct instruction, yet "best practices" tell us "guided practice" is better, and "differentiation" is best. AR gave me a solid framework with which to do all of that and my students have ranged from 4.1% - 11.7% gains in 1 9 weeks. I can't wait to see where we'll be by the end of the year. For the first time ever, I feel confident that ALL of my students will pass their end of grade tests. Why? Because I have an accurate monitoring device. Before doctors had the tools they now have to monitor patients, it was a matter of educated guessing until the patient either recovered or died. Likewise, teachers without accurate monitoring devices are left to make educated guesses until their students' reading ability either miraculously improves or their desire to improve dies. AR is part of a balanced literacy program, just like an EKG is part of balanced healthcare. Some patients don't need an EKG, and some kids don't need AR, but it doesn't hurt. As in healthcare, better to be safe than sorry. I have been teaching for 9 years and was a skeptic of AR for 3 of the 4 years that I have had the opportunity to use it. This year, due to a push for PLCs (Professional Learning Communities) in our district and to a graduate level research project, I have taken this topic on as a personal interest study and I am now a firm believer in its value. My only regret is that I didn't buy into it sooner. Google Renaissance Learning and download free copies of their guides for parents and teachers. That was my first step and it made a huge difference. There is also a discussion board on facebook where you can get lots of great tips and ideas. I'll be posting a link to my research article there when it is finished in March.
This sounds like a teacher based requirement. My students only read the book 1 time and we try to let them test as soon as possible to the completion of the book. What grade level is your daughter in? Perhaps the teacher believes students are not full comprehending the books the read or something? Best bet is to ask the Teacher about this since the last thing the teacher should want is for a student to avoid certain books because of the software. I do find it odd that the teacher would only require this for AR books and not for all books. Seems kind of questionable.
There are certainly situations where makes sense to re-read a passage, story, or chapter multiple times, and it would make sense in some specific circumstances to ask a student to re-read the same BOOK a second or even third time, it's completely inappropriate for "every independent reading book."
I wonder if the teacher has been discussing or modeling some specific reading strategies? For example, I assume that this first-grader is reading picture books, not even chapter books, and so the teacher might have been helping students to practice different strategies (viewing the pictures and making predictions about what the story is, then reading the book at a normal pace, and then re-reading to gather specific information (character names, difficult words).
If the teacher's policy is actually that students must read ANY independent reading book three times before taking the AR test, it almost sounds like a punishment or penalty, and the most immediate and significant result I'd expect would be less reading enjoyment. I'd certainly expect that that students would more frequently skim or skip sections, which might reduce reading comprehension. I'd expect students to become "sloppier first readers," which would almost certainly "spread" to content-area reading (once they formed the habit of "skimming and skipping," they'd likely need to re-read textbook passages and other written materials distributed in any class before achieving the level of comprehension that other students can achieve from a single reading.
At a previous school we used AR/Reading Renaissance to promote and reinforce reading and comprehension with the AR program/points. It is not available at my school now. Can anyone recommend viable alternatives?
On 1/30/11, Krista wrote: > At a previous school we used AR/Reading Renaissance to > promote and reinforce reading and comprehension with the AR > program/points. It is not available at my school now. Can > anyone recommend viable alternatives?
Ima TeacherYes, I know who you ask to get admission, but the group owner hasn't allowed people to be admitted in several years. The sister sites that have middle level and upper levels still does, but the lower level site has closed admissions.
You can email me, and I'll send you the information. You can try, but don't hold your breath.
I have made them myself. I have made a test for each of the stories in our reading book. I also had a very advanced student and she would read the books in my classroom and write tests for me. I would add them to the site. I would look up the reading level on-line. Our school has used them for several years. This year our server crashed and had to be re- built over the summer. Our AR is not working so I don't know if they will be saved once we have AR installed again.
I was hoping to find an answer to my question by browsing through some of the postings on AR, but the chatboard won't load. Grr... So, here is my delima. I'm on the sitebased committe at my school and we are about to start planning for next year. One of the topics we are throwing around is about our AR goals. We used to really go over the top for A...See MoreI was hoping to find an answer to my question by browsing through some of the postings on AR, but the chatboard won't load. Grr... So, here is my delima. I'm on the sitebased committe at my school and we are about to start planning for next year. One of the topics we are throwing around is about our AR goals. We used to really go over the top for AR rewards, but decided to tone it down this year. So this year we have a reward at the end of each 6 weeks for students who met their goal. We have been calling it a "goal party" even though it's usually something like a 45 minute extra recess at the end of a Friday. Or on occasion it's been a movie and popcorn. The principle is not wanting to do movie/popcorn anymore and doesn't want to do anything that will cost much since we are on a tighter budget for next year. The kids are bored with the extra recess thing, the younger kids are expecting it to be a real "party" with balloons and cake and such since that is the verbage we use. We need some fresh new ideas to reward our kids for reaching their goals, and need to call it something different that AR goal "party". Yes, I realize that reading is expected, and some will argue that they shouldn't need to be rewarded. However, that has been our practice and it will continue... so I would really appreciate any feedback.
On 5/09/11, Christi Chism wrote: > Reddick-Collier Elem in Reddick, Fl has an awesome reward > system. They offer a couple of different functions after each > quarter. The goal is generally over 85% and they have met their > point goal. They have had a dance, desert table and special > activities. It really motivates the students, especially when > half of the class if leaving for a fun event. At the end of the > school year. The top girl and top boy are awarded bikes. It has > changed my daughters idea of reading. She is very competitive, > so she has exceeded our goals for the year trying to win the > bike. Yeah for Reddick Collier!!
I hope they have lots of drinks. That "desert" table sounds very dry.
On 11/12/11, Love it!! wrote: > Great ideas!! :) > > On 5/09/11, Christi Chism wrote: >> Reddick-Collier Elem in Reddick, Fl has an awesome reward >> system. They offer a couple of different functions after each >> quarter. The goal is generally over 85% and they have met their >> point goal. They have had a dance, desert table and special >> activities. It really motivates the students, especially when >> half of the class if leaving for a fun event. At the end of the >> school year. The top girl and top boy are awarded bikes. It has >> changed my daughters idea of reading. She is very competitive, >> so she has exceeded our goals for the year trying to win the >> bike. Yeah for Reddick Collier!!
Just read your post. First grade, in my granddaughter's class, is available for all students. The grade level has typed the questions for each book. Then the first graders take the test via paper and pencil. They also don't start AR until January. Hope that helps.
Hi Suz. I taught 1st grade last school year and used AR after many of the students were reading. If you are fortunate enough to have AR Online, many of the tests have recorded questions. I always used this option. If the questions were not recorded, I simply read the questions to the student. Good Luck!!
On 6/03/11, Shully wrote: > On 5/31/11, fjj wrote: >> AR won't allow students to retake tests they have already taken. > > > Right, AR will not allow a quiz to be retaken if the student checked > off that they read it independently. That is not what I am > referring to. > > Suppose a teacher read a book with the class (for a class > assignment, not AR) during the 3rd quarter of the year. The > students completed the book in that quarter, and took whatever > teacher-made assessment was provided. Then, during 4th quarter the > school starts an AR rewards program to encourage reading. The > teacher learned that the book she covered already is an AR book and > encouraged her students to take the quiz on the book they covered > the previous quarter. I hope my question is more clear now....Is > that cheating, in your opinion
On 6/09/11, LaurieA wrote: > If they comprehend well enough to earn points I think it's fine. > > On 6/03/11, Shully wrote: >> On 5/31/11, fjj wrote: >>> AR won't allow students to retake tests they have already taken. >> >> >> Right, AR will not allow a quiz to be retaken if the student checked >> off that they read it independently. That is not what I am >> referring to. >> >> Suppose a teacher read a book with the class (for a class >> assignment, not AR) during the 3rd quarter of the year. The >> students completed the book in that quarter, and took whatever >> teacher-made assessment was provided. Then, during 4th quarter the >> school starts an AR rewards program to encourage reading. The >> teacher learned that the book she covered already is an AR book and >> encouraged her students to take the quiz on the book they covered >> the previous quarter. I hope my question is more clear now....Is >> that cheating, in your opinion
It is perfectly acceptable to be used as a part of the grade. The AR company has guidelines for that. It's especially used in middle & high schools as a grade. It's ...See More