Do you find the Star Test to be helpful when determining student problems and reading levels? We only have the old Star program and I would like to know if the newest Star program is any better or the same. Thank, Jillian
JoyJillian, I'm sorry that I'm just seeing this. Yes, the new STAR and it's new reports are extremely helpful. Our teachers are using the data with confidence.
We are trying to decide if it is better to encourage the students to do a maximum word count for accelerated reader or if they should read a number of books. Our concern is non- fiction books have less words, yet we want to encourage more non-fiction reading.
My school is new to AR and we...See MoreWould someone take the time to explain to me how your school runs the AR program? STAR test already given... 1. When do students take the AR test? 2. Where do students take the AR test? 3. Does one person, like the librarian, give time to take the test OR does each classroom teacher give time to take the test?
My school is new to AR and we want to set it up correctly. We have a difference of opinion.
On 8/30/12, Lisa wrote: > Would someone take the time to explain to me how your > school runs the AR program? STAR test already given... > 1. When do students take the AR test? > 2. Where do students take the AR test? > 3. Does one person, like the librarian, give time to take > the test OR does each classroom teacher give time to take > the test? > > My school is new to AR and we want to set it up correctly. > We have a difference of opinion. > > Thanks for any/all help!
For those who won't read the whole story, just know that it up until...See MoreI know that this website is named teachers.net and that implies that it would be only teachers posting on here. However, thanks to the nature of the internet, I don't have to be a teacher to do so. So let me tell you my story, a student's story, about Accelerated Reader.
For those who won't read the whole story, just know that it up until this point and probably for quite some time into the future, destroyed any hope of me reading for enjoyment. Ever.
Also, my elementary school used this as the primary form of teaching reading skills.
The first time I took the test for this program was in third grade, so I was 9 years old. I maxed the test out to grade "13" or a college freshman. No one else had done that at my school before, so they didn't know what to do. So, what they did do was exactly the same as how they treated everyone else. I couldn't go any more than 3 grades below my minimum reading level, or a "13." I also couldn't go more than 3 grades above, but there was no literature in that range. This happened until I moved onto middle school through 6th grade. I had eventually been forced to read practically every book at that range, and most of those books involved large amounts of symbolism and complex structure. I understood the structure, but, at the time, it was so beyond boring to me, starting as a 9 year old reading what someone twice my age would.
This led to two things, one I already said. I did not read one fictional book (I devour non-fiction) in elementary, middle, or the first two years of high school for enjoyment. By my junior year (current year) I have only read THREE books for my personal enjoyment, all in the same series. I directly blame this upon AR.
The second thing this caused was I refused to accept symbols in literature. Often, the first thing we learn sticks in our mind and takes much, much assailing to change. I learned that in advanced literature, due to the nature of the AR tests, that the symbols are so very limited.
And that is all I have to say. If this sounded angry, it is. I loved those three books. I don't know if I will be picking up any more books soon for the same reasons, but I know I regret having the desire to read out of pleasure beaten out of me.
On 8/30/12, John Doe wrote: > I know that ...See MoreA problem that I see with what you are saying is that in my 16 years of teaching I have seen a lot of elementary age students score at the 13th grade level each year. So I find your story to not be all surprising and find it more difficult to believe that they didn't know what to do about you.
On 8/30/12, John Doe wrote: > I know that this website is named teachers.net and that > implies that it would be only teachers posting on > However, thanks to the nature of the internet, I don't have > to be a teacher to do so. So let me tell you my story, a > student's story, about Accelerated Reader. > > For those who won't read the whole story, just know that it > up until this point and probably for quite some time into > the future, destroyed any hope of me reading for enjoyment. > Ever. > > Also, my elementary school used this as the primary form of > teaching reading skills. > > The first time I took the test for this program was in > third grade, so I was 9 years old. I maxed the test out to > grade "13" or a college freshman. No one else had done that > at my school before, so they didn't know what to do. So, > what they did do was exactly the same as how they treated > everyone else. I couldn't go any more than 3 grades below > my minimum reading level, or a "13." I also couldn't go > more than 3 grades above, but there was no literature in > that range. This happened until I moved onto middle school > through 6th grade. I had eventually been forced to read > practically every book at that range, and most of those > books involved large amounts of symbolism and complex > structure. I understood the structure, but, at the time, it > was so beyond boring to me, starting as a 9 year old > reading what someone twice my age would. > > This led to two things, one I already said. I did not read > one fictional book (I devour non-fiction) in elementary, > middle, or the first two years of high school for > enjoyment. By my junior year (current year) I have only > read THREE books for my personal enjoyment, all in the same > series. I directly blame this upon AR. > > The second thing this caused was I refused to accept > symbols in literature. Often, the first thing we learn > sticks in our mind and takes much, much assailing to > change. I learned that in advanced literature, due to the > nature of the AR tests, that the symbols are so very > limited. > > And that is all I have to say. If this sounded angry, it > is. I loved those three books. I don't know if I will be > picking up any more books soon for the same reasons, but I > know I regret having the desire to read out of pleasure > beaten out of me. > > --A High School Junior.
As with any program or idea it should be implemented correctly to get good results. Students will be motivated if teachers are positive, if student have a say-so in their goal, and know that practicing reading with make them better readers and that they need to be able to read well to be successful in life.
Reading should NOT be about AR, it should be about enjoying reading. Both my school's librarian and I agree that AR is detrimental to a child's desire to build a lifelong love of reading. We would like to see it discontinued at our school.
It's a shame schools use it as a way to reward children with little trinkets and such. At our school, it's the opportunity to dress down for a day. It's certainly not motivating children to read more!
On 9/07/12, Kate wrote: > Yes! I am struggling with the same thing. My son has been > assigned to earn 10 AR points each trimester. He was also told > he is not allowed to read ANYTHING not in his assigned range > until he has met his 10 point target. He was in tears about > this. He loves to read, but is only allowed to read 1 book at > a time (according to his teacher) and it must be an approved > book in his range. Right now he is into the "Magic Tree House" > series, which admittedly is very easy for him, but it is fun. > Accelerated Reader is making him hate to read, since he can't > read what he wants. What do I do? I emailed the teacher > asking if these were her rules and I was flabbergasted to find > out they are.
On 11/17/12, Students should set their own goals wrote: > Well isn't that just a wonderful way to get kids to hate reading? > This is why I am so opposed to mandating AR points. I let my kids > choose their own points each quarter. Solid readers usually choose > high, slow readers usually choose mid range, and reluctant readers > usually choose less than 20 pts per quarter. I don't fight it, or > demand anything else. If I didn't have to use it to grade the > "reads independently" standard, I wouldn't have my kids take AR > tests at all. > > Reading should NOT be about AR, it should be about enjoying > reading. Both my school's librarian and I agree that AR is > detrimental to a child's desire to build a lifelong love of > reading. We would like to see it discontinued at our school. > > It's a shame schools use it as a way to reward children with > little trinkets and such. At our school, it's the opportunity to > dress down for a day. It's certainly not motivating children to > read more! > > > > On 9/07/12, Kate wrote: >> Yes! I am struggling with the same thing. My son has been >> assigned to earn 10 AR points each trimester. He was also told >> he is not allowed to read ANYTHING not in his assigned range >> until he has met his 10 point target. He was in tears about >> this. He loves to read, but is only allowed to read 1 book at >> a time (according to his teacher) and it must be an approved >> book in his range. Right now he is into the "Magic Tree House" >> series, which admittedly is very easy for him, but it is fun. >> Accelerated Reader is making him hate to read, since he can't >> read what he wants. What do I do? I emailed the teacher >> asking if these were her rules and I was flabbergasted to find >> out they are.
We have to turn in an AR Plan. I have never used it. I know how it works. I am new to 3rd grade. What is a reasonible plan. Thank you for your time. Does anyone have a link that would help.
Next year, we will be incorporating ELA common core standards, and of course these standards include a totally new approach to how students should be comprehending reading. I've already begun a dialogue with the district's standards person, who asked for feedback on the proposed changes. I stated that AR would become obsolete with these new changes - as the AR tests do not delve into the depths of a book. Plus, the new standards require a 50/50 split between non-fiction and fiction reading. AR contains mostly fictional books.
I'm hoping this will be the end of AR at our school, as it serves no purpose for anything other than letting kids dress down for a day. Even reluctant readers won't make the effort.