For Marie, I am not complaining about my son reading... I want him to read. My issure is this.... he is not getting the time in school to read that his goal is based on... so that means for him to reach his goal, it requires more reading time at home... that extra reading time at home along with the other homework is causing him to hate reading. It appears to me that that is not what we ( my wife and I and the school) wants to happen. I am looking for ways to help the situation.. I am just asking for input from people more educated and experienced than I. I felt I had legit concerns and from the tone I took from some replies, I felt attacked and made to feel like an incompetent parent, which I feel I am not. I may not be as familiar with all of the inner workings as some of you guys, thats why I'm here. I have not complained about AR at all... What I have asked is why this or why that, as pure questions and trying to understand what is happening and why and if this is the best way to get kids to read. I felt I got labeled as a parent that hates AR ( which I do not)and am just here to stir the pot. Deb, I did not say I hate you!! Where in any of my post is that word used???? I think part of the problem here is the offense you apparently taken to my questioning how things work and why things work the way they do. I took some of your replys as "with attitude" like "I have 3000 to be exact", and "Maybe you need to spend more time modeling reading to your son instead of complaining on a chatboard. Take him to the library or a book store and read!". That is where I took things as unprofessional and condesending. If I mistook them for that, I apologize to you.
Again, the whole carrot/whip thing..... I was under the impression that AR was supposed to get kids to want to read (carrot) and not MAKE (whip)kids read. This is what is happening due to the parameters the school has set the goals with but then doesnt give them the time the parameters were set upon. Thats my issue... not the AR as a whole.
...See MoreKids are assigned WAY too much reading WAY too early.
My experience is that most of them already hate reading by the time they reach high school, maybe sooner.
The overload on reading leads to dishonesty in reporting, too, so we compromise the kids' integrity, their time, and their appreciation for education as an entity.
It's a shame.
On 1/08/10, Fireman Dad wrote: > Deb, on your last post, you stated I did not post what the > specifics were on my issue with AR. Please read my first > post and I believe I stated exactly the reading parameters > clearly, at least to me. The only thing I did not include > was that my son was in elementry school. > I have sopken to the teachers and librarian and principal > about our issues. That is still in the works of handling > the issues. I DO NOT hate AR nor am I tring to bash it. I > feel I have legimiate questions and I was here looking for > answers or other like issues. > > For Marie, I am not complaining about my son reading... I > want him to read. My issure is this.... he is not getting > the time in school to read that his goal is based on... so > that means for him to reach his goal, it requires more > reading time at home... that extra reading time at home > along with the other homework is causing him to hate > reading. It appears to me that that is not what we ( my > wife and I and the school) wants to happen. I am looking > for ways to help the situation.. I am just asking for input > from people more educated and experienced than I. I felt I > had legit concerns and from the tone I took from some > replies, I felt attacked and made to feel like an > incompetent parent, which I feel I am not. I may not be as > familiar with all of the inner workings as some of you > guys, thats why I'm here. I have not complained about AR > at all... What I have asked is why this or why that, as > pure questions and trying to understand what is happening > and why and if this is the best way to get kids to read. I > felt I got labeled as a parent that hates AR ( which I do > not)and am just here to stir the pot. > Deb, I did not say I hate you!! Where in any of my post is > that word used???? I think part of the problem here is the > offense you apparently taken to my questioning how things > work and why things work the way they do. I took some of > your replys as "with attitude" like "I have 3000 to be > exact", and "Maybe you need to spend more time modeling > reading to your son instead of complaining on a chatboard. > Take him to the library or a book store and read!". That > is where I took things as unprofessional and condesending. > If I mistook them for that, I apologize to you. > > Again, the whole carrot/whip thing..... I was under the > impression that AR was supposed to get kids to want to read > (carrot) and not MAKE (whip)kids read. This is what is > happening due to the parameters the school has set the > goals with but then doesnt give them the time the > parameters were set upon. Thats my issue... not the AR as > a whole.
However, this is a board to be used by people who want to learn more about the AR program and how to use it properly.
I really don't care when people show up with complaints, but be willing to work to correct it.
Don't argue with the people who know how to run the program. Deb ms/IA and Ima Teacher both have years of experience with the program and the proper training to help it work. They have both been willing to give FREE training tips. And Ima Teacher is even a certified trainer, and she gets PAID to go to schools and train staff.
Both know their stuff, and all they get here is grief. Arguing about how the program is supposed to be run with the people who know how to run it just makes you look ignorant. If your school paid for you to go to a training by Renaissance Learning, would you argue with their presenters, too? Would you rant and rave and call names and tell them that they don't know what they are talking about? I certainly hope you wouldn't. Why is this any different?
If you don't like AR, I'm willing to bet it's because it's not being run properly. There, I said it. GET TRAINIG!! I said it again! Ima Teacher said it and she was run off the board on a rail. Deb says it, and people are trying their best to run her off as well.
Now instead of people being able to learn on the board, they get nothing. The people who have legitimate questions and want to learn can't get any information because they get run off by all the bitching and moaning from the people who are unwilling to accept that they just might be the ones that are wrong.
So, I hope that those of you who hate AR and will have it no other way are happy that you have ruined the board. And since so many are unwilling to take the time to learn the proper way to run the program, then it serves you right if your program crashes and burns.
On 1/08/10, AR Fan wrote: > If it looks like a whip, sounds like a whip, feels like a whip, > then..... it's a whip. > > > On 1/08/10, Fireman Dad wrote: >> >> Ok, I now feel like innocent bystander is talking to me.
On 1/08/10, Fireman Dad wrote: > On 1/08/10, Marie wrote: >> You are obviously a great dad who is concerned about his kids and >> active in their education, but it did sound like you were >> complaining that your son has to read at home. > > My only complaint about reading at home is that we are expected to > read our regular 15 minutes at home plus any balance from school. > I felt I was keeping my end of the bargan but the school was not > and my son was paying the price with extra work at home. > > The teacher has to >> use some of the AR time to let the kids take the tests. They only >> take 5-10 minutes and no one takes one every day so most of the >> time is still for reading. > > My son takes an AR test almost everyday. His goal is 14 points > every 6 weeks. He reads a .5 book and tests almost everyday. 28 > days out of 30 for a .5 book to meet his goal. He has tried the > 1.0 books but looking at them, its easier for him to read two .5 > books than one 1.0 book, so he is testing almost everyday. This is > where it has become the whip. I am not one to say just go for the > easy way out, but at some point, something has to give. His > reading has just become a means to an end, and the journey to get > to the end is not as important as just getting to the end. > > They also need to find a book to read >> unless you do that with your son yourself by taking him to the >> library or bookstore. As teachers, we are so frustrated when kids >> have time to do everything else but read. If they even spent half >> the amount of time reading that they do playing video games and >> all the other things mentioned previously, there would be no >> problem. > > The problem is they are still kids and need to be let to do kid > things besides reading and school work. I'm not advocating letting > my sons play video games for hours every evening but that is some > fun for them and that is what kids like to do also. I try and have > them play outside as much as possible weather permitting but after > their school day, then home for a snack and on to homework for over > an hour and then supper, its almost to late for them to even go > outside and play like 6-8 year olds should be doing. I feel that > the physical exercise of playing outside is important as well. > > If it doesn't count for a grade, I guarantee many, if not >> most, kids would blow it off. Some kids read no matter what, but >> many need motivation in the form of a grade. Besides, why >> shouldn't the ones who reach their goals get the better grade they >> deserve? Again, this is a small portion of their grade, not all >> of it. Maybe your son's goal is set too high for him too. That >> would need to be discussed with his teacher and he may possibly be >> wasting the time he is given at school to read. Still as a >> teacher, I'd rather have involved caring parents who ask questions >> (even if I disagree with them) than ones who did not even care at > all. >> >> On 1/08/10, Fireman Dad wrote: >>> >>> Ok, I now feel like innocent bystander is talking to me. If >>> so, fine, here is my reply… >>> First, I have never said I hate Ar, I have never said I have >>> a complaint with AR, or a gripe with AR… >>> I said I have some issues with the way it is in my school. I >>> know it is an issue with the time allowed to read in school. >>> I am addressing these issues with the school now. I am >>> asking if anyone else has these same issues. >>> I also asked why the need to use the AR quizzes as a test >>> grade. From what I have read, it clearly states they do not >>> recommend doing that. It goes on to state that they know it >>> will be done and then gives guidelines to do it. All I am >>> asking is WHY… I am not saying it’s necessarily wrong to do >>> it, just why. >>> I have stated that my son is starting to resent reading >>> because of the reading time at home has grown due to the time >>> in school is not always provided. This in turn has changed >>> how my son looks at the AR reading… it has turned from the >>> carrot to the whip… that’s how it is in my home…. DO NOT tell >>> me that that is not the case. You may tell me that it is not >>> intended to be that way. You may tell me that is not how any >>> of your students or children view it, but do not tell me how >>> it is being perceived in my home. We have always read to our >>> 2 sons. We have worn out numerous books from reading so much >>> and because they brought us books to them to read even before >>> they could read. We have went through several Goodnight Moon >>> books, Cat in the Hat books etc. >>> I believe there were assumptions made by some on this board >>> that were wrong. It is also possible that my posts were >>> misunderstood. That may have caused some certain responses >>> by some to me that was taken wrong by me. If that is the >>> case, I have apologized for that. I am not trying to run >>> anyone off of this site. I came on because I thought this >>> was a great place to get some feedback on my issues and to >>> see if it was an isolated thing or if others have run into >>> similar issues and how to address them. >>> It is very apparent that there may be several sides to this >>> issue. I firmly believe that all sides have different stakes >>> and viewpoints. I believe that people that take the time to >>> post or reply are very passionate about their views. I am >>> frustrated by some replies because I feel I am misunderstood, >>> and quite possibly due to my lack of clarification of either >>> my issues or my views about the program. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/08/10, innocent bystander wrote: >>>> If you have a gripe with AR, that's fine and dandy. Gripe >>>> away. >>>> >>>> However, this is a board to be used by people who want to >>>> learn more about the AR program and how to use it properly. >>>> >>>> I really don't care when people show up with complaints, >>>> but be willing to work to correct it. >>>> >>>> Don't argue with the people who know how to run the >>>> program. Deb ms/IA and Ima Teacher both have years of >>>> experience with the program and the proper training to help >>>> it work. They have both been willing to give FREE training >>>> tips. And Ima Teacher is even a certified trainer, and she >>>> gets PAID to go to schools and train staff. >>>> >>>> Both know their stuff, and all they get here is grief. >>>> Arguing about how the program is supposed to be run with >>>> the people who know how to run it just makes you look >>>> ignorant. If your school paid for you to go to a training >>>> by Renaissance Learning, would you argue with their >>>> presenters, too? Would you rant and rave and call names >>>> and tell them that they don't know what they are talking >>>> about? I certainly hope you wouldn't. Why is this any >>>> different? >>>> >>>> If you don't like AR, I'm willing to bet it's because it's >>>> not being run properly. There, I said it. GET TRAINIG!! >>>> I said it again! Ima Teacher said it and she was run off >>>> the board on a rail. Deb says it, and people are trying >>>> their best to run her off as well. >>>> >>>> Now instead of people being able to learn on the board, >>>> they get nothing. The people who have legitimate questions >>>> and want to learn can't get any information because they >>>> get run off by all the bitching and moaning from the people >>>> who are unwilling to accept that they just might be the >>>> ones that are wrong. >>>> >>>> So, I hope that those of you who hate AR and will have it >>>> no other way are happy that you have ruined the board. And >>>> since so many are unwilling to take the time to learn the >>>> proper way to run the program, then it serves you right if >>>> your program crashes and burns.
Fireman DadOn 1/12/10, Melissa wrote: > Fireman Dad, I must say that I agree with you 100%. My son > is an above level reader who is now not wanting to read at > all because of AR. They have set these kids up for failure. > The point goals they set are too high to reach when > considering all the other work they have to do. Studying > spelli...See MoreOn 1/12/10, Melissa wrote: > Fireman Dad, I must say that I agree with you 100%. My son > is an above level reader who is now not wanting to read at > all because of AR. They have set these kids up for failure. > The point goals they set are too high to reach when > considering all the other work they have to do. Studying > spelling every night, reading there story every night, > math, spelling packs, practicing math facts......it is > ridiculous. They are just kids and they have alot of > reading ahead of them to do over the next years of school > and they are getting burned out on it during their > elementary years. And then to count it as a grade, for > which it was never intended and then to punish the kids who > have not made their goal by making them sit in a room and > read while the others have a party!!!! I think AR could be > a good program when used as intended. I think kids should > read but I also think kids should be allowed to be kids. > They want to know why graduation rates have gone > down......its because they burn kids out to early!!!
Thank you Melissa for your post. I too understand that this is a teachers site, however I thought this would be the perfect place to get some answers and or opinions on the issues I was having. It seems like the teachers love AR by the posts and replys, and are not very receptive to my and now our issues. I understand that it can be a great program to supplement reading instruction, but it seems to me that it is not being used as intended. All I am looking for is why use it for a grade, and why the time parameters used for setting the goal are not being adhered to by the school. I understand that is a school issue and again I am tring to rectify that, but I was looking more for info about that being an issue with anyone else.
MelissaOn 1/12/10, Fireman Dad wrote: > On 1/12/10, Melissa wrote: >> Fireman Dad, I must say that I agree with you 100%. My son >> is an above level reader who is now not wanting to read at >> all because of AR. They have set these kids up for failure. >> The point goals they set are too high to reach when >> considering ...See MoreOn 1/12/10, Fireman Dad wrote: > On 1/12/10, Melissa wrote: >> Fireman Dad, I must say that I agree with you 100%. My son >> is an above level reader who is now not wanting to read at >> all because of AR. They have set these kids up for failure. >> The point goals they set are too high to reach when >> considering all the other work they have to do. Studying >> spelling every night, reading there story every night, >> math, spelling packs, practicing math facts......it is >> ridiculous. They are just kids and they have alot of >> reading ahead of them to do over the next years of school >> and they are getting burned out on it during their >> elementary years. And then to count it as a grade, for >> which it was never intended and then to punish the kids who >> have not made their goal by making them sit in a room and >> read while the others have a party!!!! I think AR could be >> a good program when used as intended. I think kids should >> read but I also think kids should be allowed to be kids. >> They want to know why graduation rates have gone >> down......its because they burn kids out to early!!! > > Thank you Melissa for your post. I too understand that this > is a teachers site, however I thought this would be the > perfect place to get some answers and or opinions on the > issues I was having. It seems like the teachers love AR by > the posts and replys, and are not very receptive to my and > now our issues. I understand that it can be a great program > to supplement reading instruction, but it seems to me that it > is not being used as intended. All I am looking for is why > use it for a grade, and why the time parameters used for > setting the goal are not being adhered to by the school. I > understand that is a school issue and again I am tring to > rectify that, but I was looking more for info about that > being an issue with anyone else.
Yes, time and grade and punishment for not meeting their specific requirements is my concern too. I am not only seeing this from a parent standpoint but also as a person who works in the school system with elementary students. If they could make the program a little more motivation to ALL students, such as giving prizes at different levels and not making it count as a grade. My feel is that not only is it hurting children who are good readers by discouraging them and "forcing" them to read a specific type of book in a specific time frame, it is also hurting the children who may not be very good readers and try really hard but just can't make the high goal set before them. And with these tests, in order to get the full points, you must make 100%. This hurts the kids struggling to read and comprehend because it makes it even harder for them to reach the goal. I believe children need expectations and standards to reach, but when then expectations and standards are too high...it just sets them up for failure. And that is where this program has gone way off track. It was created to help reluctant readers become more motivated and in turn it is turning children away from reading. I think each school need to review this program and see how it is being used within the school and revamp it to be motivational for readers....not discouraging. Melissa
I'm a parent... one that notices what is happening in my home. I have never said that it happens everywhere, but it is happening in MY home. My son is starting to hate to read. This issue has only came about this year since the AR has really been pushed. He now sees reading as a means to an end. There are those who say as long as he is reading.. ok to a point. I feel that as this AR thing progresses, the motivation used to make him read will ultimately make him hate reading.
> > Don't bother to answer that, by the way, as I'm not wasting any > more of my time here. Enjoy your bitch and moan board. > > I know that my school chooses to run the program properly and get > the training that is required by the company. The rest of you can > take your lack of training and unwillingness to learn and continue > on the fast track to nowhere.
And you can take your unwillingness to listen and reevaluate a program that may be flawed and actually counterproductive to reading and go on the fast track to nowhere along with my sons reading attitude.
> "Why do some people believe that teachers and schools blindly choose > programs to use and implement them for years, without reevaluating along > the way? Just because some teachers don't agree with you doesn't mean > that they aren't evaluating programs . . ."
Because, two years after my husband and I first raised questions about AR and its misuse, our school department here just presented its E/LA curriculum review to the school board, and it turns out they they plan to keep misusing AR the same way: as a crude means of enforcing at-home reading requirements, and by plugging in individual quiz scores directly as part of students' E/LA grades. No support, no in-class AR reading time. It's clearly wrong, as "Ima teacher" wrote earlier today.
Thank you so much, "Ima teacher," for your response. We may not agree on everything (such as your interpretation of whether Renaissance acknowledges some schools "need" to grade AR, or if they actually state they they know some schools "will" use it for grades--please recheck), but your comments here are very enlightening and helpful.
"Ima," what do you suggest a parent do next, when they know the E/LA teachers are using AR wrong and that it is hurting their child's motivation to read, but the school takes no action to correct things, and in fact makes it clear in their curriculum review that it plans to continue using it wrong?
We've written to the school board and are awaiting a response, but we're really at a loss because our daughter is affected right now. It's difficult to know where to turn, so we really appreciate your help.
At least Fireman Dad's school is being responsive to his concerns.
Take a typical month at work. How many things do you, during the course of that month, have to do that you really don't want to do? And of those things that you hate doing, which of those would you NOT do if you didn't have some kind of "whip" making you do them?
Sometimes you've just got to suck it up and do it . . . like it or not.
fireman's daughter-I was the one who suggested the "exemption" from AR simply because I know that in my school, we do not have unlimited access to tests. We pay (OUT OF THE TEACHER"S POCKET!!) for every test. They are $3.95 per test, must be sent to the school on a disc or via the internet, and there is a $50.00 minimum order. My new principal (two years now) has not...See MoreI was the one who suggested the "exemption" from AR simply because I know that in my school, we do not have unlimited access to tests. We pay (OUT OF THE TEACHER"S POCKET!!) for every test. They are $3.95 per test, must be sent to the school on a disc or via the internet, and there is a $50.00 minimum order. My new principal (two years now) has not invested a dime into the AR program or into new books. Each year, our school library loses approximately 300 books, and has another 100 or so damaged so badly that they are not able to be read. Another teacher and I bought $65.00 in tests EACH last May. Our school library does NOT have the books- but the kids can get them from the public library- titles such as Diary of a Wimpy Kid, the entire Twilight Series, the House of Night series, and some Scobre press books to name a few. We bought the tests for the upper grades because their titles were SO outdated- (Hitty, Johnny Tremain, Pippi Longstocking) The upper level book selection is EXTREMELY limited. I know that my girls were reading Twilight, so I bought all the tests for them. I also heard that AR tests change as soon as a movie comes out, so that kids can't simply watch the movie. In my school, the tests do not change. Once we order them, they get installed, and they never update. Yes, we need to spend more money on updating our library books and AR tests. Will it happen? Probably NOT in my lifetime, and I am NOT about to tackle the double-edged sword. Our principal is the type who jumps to write-up an individual for THINKING that something could be improved at our school. We are not allowed to question anything. Ever. Otherwise, "you're on the list..." and that's not such a pleasant place to be. So, I'd understand if a parent had a problem with AR .Our books, in particular, are old, outdated, and uninteresting. I totally agree that parents are the best judge of their child's personality, and if Fireman Dad notices that his son is losing the "spark" to read, and AR may be the culprit, I say, let him keep reading, but let him choose the material- AR or not. Who are we to tell him that he is wrong for noticing a change in HIS child? This is a concerned parent, and I think that we as teachers tend to dismiss parents as "problems" without REALLY listening. It should not have any impact on honor roll, either. AR is not supposed to be graded, or have an impact on a child's reading GRADE. It is to make them practice reading so their grade goes up as a RESULT of reading. I know you're in a tough spot, Fireman Dad. I hope it can be worked out, and I hope your son continues to read for pleasure throughout his life. On 1/15/10, fyi wrote: > Some schools have to pay for AR tests one book at a time so > they are very limited to the tests their students can take. > Our school subscribes to a on-line site where every book > written practically has an AR test so there is no problem > finding a book to take a test on. > > On 1/15/10, Fireman Dad wrote: >> On 1/14/10, to Fireman Dad wrote: >>> Again, I repeat, you are not here for help or advice >>> because you have come >>> back with some defense for every single point made. >> >> Just the ones that keep repeating the same ole song and >> dance of "well, if they are reading now, thats our only >> concern, no matter of the effects that it may cause later >> in life, such has hating reading because of the illogical >> motivation for the short term." >> >> You >>> are here to get someone to agree with you and you found >>> someone. You are not taking any advice offered though >>> even from that person. Have you thought yet about not >>> having your son take a .5 test every single day as was >>> suggested by someone? >> >> Yes I have gotten him some higher point books. Here is >> somewhat of a catch 22 in the system that I see. It may >> take him 4 times as long to read the 2.0 book over a .5, >> so the 4 days later when he takes his fact recall quiz, it >> stands to reason his fact recall on the first days reading >> may not be as sharp, thus lowering his GRADE which he gets >> which in turn cause him to have to read more books to make >> up the balance of the points not earned. >> >> That is not what he needs to help >>> his love of reading when he is pressured every single >>> day to take and pass a test. Why not enjoy a longer >>> book for a week and only take a test once a week? Also >>> to the teacher who told you to see if your son could be >>> exempt, I don't know what kind of outdated AR program >>> you have at your school, but ours is all on-line so >>> there is rarely a book without an AR test available. >> >> I dont understand the correlation between the teacher who >> suggested the exemption and the AR program. Could you >> explain that a little clearer please? >> >> >>> Even new books have a test out within a week or less >>> and kids have endless possibilities of books to read. >>> Maybe your school needs to invest some money into their >>> AR program. >> >> >> Possibly, or try using it as recommended. >> >> >> On 1/14/10, Fireman Dad wrote: >>>> On 1/14/10, innocent bystander wrote: >>>>> Even in our properly-run, graded program there are >>>>> students who are EXEMPT from AR. There are students >>>>> who read books that aren't AR books. >>>>> >>>>> The program has flexibility. >>>>> >>>>> However, "you're making my chld hate to >>>>> read" doesn't hold water as a way to get out >>>>> of it. >>>> >>>> As long as the kids pass the standardized tests, >>>> thats the main goal here so the schools can still get >>>> the funding. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And, one more thing, the program is NOT supposed to >>>>> make kids like reading. >>>> >>>> It doing its job then. >>>> >>>> It's supposed to make them better at it. And nobody can >>>>> deny that good independent reading ability is a >>>>> necessary skill. >>>>>
On 1/15/10, fireman's daughter- wrote: > I was the one who suggested the "exemption" from AR simply because > I know that in my school, we do not have unlimited access to > tests. We pay (OUT OF THE TEACHER"S POCKET!!) for every test. They > are $3.95 per test, must be sent to the school on a disc or via > the internet, and there is a $50.00 minimum order. My new principal > (two years now) has not invested a dime into the AR program or > into new books. Each year, our school library loses approximately > 300 books, and has another 100 or so damaged so badly that they > are not able to be read. Another teacher and I bought $65.00 in > tests EACH last May. Our school library does NOT have the books- > but the kids can get them from the public library- titles such as > Diary of a Wimpy Kid, the entire Twilight Series, the House of > Night series, and some Scobre press books to name a few. We bought > the tests for the upper grades because their titles were SO > outdated- (Hitty, Johnny Tremain, Pippi Longstocking) The upper > level book selection is EXTREMELY limited. I know that my girls > were reading Twilight, so I bought all the tests for them. I also > heard that AR tests change as soon as a movie comes out, so that > kids can't simply watch the movie. In my school, the tests do not > change. Once we order them, they get installed, and they never > update. Yes, we need to spend more money on updating our library > books and AR tests. Will it happen? Probably NOT in my lifetime, > and I am NOT about to tackle the double-edged sword. Our principal > is the type who jumps to write-up an individual for THINKING that > something could be improved at our school. We are not allowed to > question anything. Ever. Otherwise, "you're on the list..." and > that's not such a pleasant place to be. So, I'd understand if a > parent had a problem with AR .Our books, in particular, are old, > outdated, and uninteresting. I totally agree that parents are the > best judge of their child's personality, and if Fireman Dad > notices that his son is losing the "spark" to read, and AR may be > the culprit, I say, let him keep reading, but let him choose the > material- AR or not. Who are we to tell him that he is wrong for > noticing a change in HIS child? This is a concerned parent, and I > think that we as teachers tend to dismiss parents as "problems" > without REALLY listening. It should not have any impact on honor > roll, either. AR is not supposed to be graded, or have an impact > on a child's reading GRADE. It is to make them practice reading so > their grade goes up as a RESULT of reading. I know you're in a > tough spot, Fireman Dad. I hope it can be worked out, and I hope > your son continues to read for pleasure throughout his life. On > 1/15/10, fyi wrote: >> Some schools have to pay for AR tests one book at a time so >> they are very limited to the tests their students can take. >> Our school subscribes to a on-line site where every book >> written practically has an AR test so there is no problem >> finding a book to take a test on. >> >> On 1/15/10, Fireman Dad wrote: >>> On 1/14/10, to Fireman Dad wrote: >>>> Again, I repeat, you are not here for help or advice >>>> because you have come >>>> back with some defense for every single point made. >>> >>> Just the ones that keep repeating the same ole song and >>> dance of "well, if they are reading now, thats our only >>> concern, no matter of the effects that it may cause later >>> in life, such has hating reading because of the illogical >>> motivation for the short term." >>> >>> You >>>> are here to get someone to agree with you and you found >>>> someone. You are not taking any advice offered though >>>> even from that person. Have you thought yet about not >>>> having your son take a .5 test every single day as was >>>> suggested by someone? >>> >>> Yes I have gotten him some higher point books. Here is >>> somewhat of a catch 22 in the system that I see. It may >>> take him 4 times as long to read the 2.0 book over a .5, >>> so the 4 days later when he takes his fact recall quiz, it >>> stands to reason his fact recall on the first days reading >>> may not be as sharp, thus lowering his GRADE which he gets >>> which in turn cause him to have to read more books to make >>> up the balance of the points not earned. >>> >>> That is not what he needs to help >>>> his love of reading when he is pressured every single >>>> day to take and pass a test. Why not enjoy a longer >>>> book for a week and only take a test once a week? Also >>>> to the teacher who told you to see if your son could be >>>> exempt, I don't know what kind of outdated AR program >>>> you have at your school, but ours is all on-line so >>>> there is rarely a book without an AR test available. >>> >>> I dont understand the correlation between the teacher who >>> suggested the exemption and the AR program. Could you >>> explain that a little clearer please? >>> >>> >>>> Even new books have a test out within a week or less >>>> and kids have endless possibilities of books to read. >>>> Maybe your school needs to invest some money into their >>>> AR program. >>> >>> >>> Possibly, or try using it as recommended. >>> >>> >>> On 1/14/10, Fireman Dad wrote: >>>>> On 1/14/10, innocent bystander wrote: >>>>>> Even in our properly-run, graded program there are >>>>>> students who are EXEMPT from AR. There are students >>>>>> who read books that aren't AR books. >>>>>> >>>>>> The program has flexibility. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, "you're making my chld hate to >>>>>> read" doesn't hold water as a way to get out >>>>>> of it. >>>>> >>>>> As long as the kids pass the standardized tests, >>>>> thats the main goal here so the schools can still get >>>>> the funding. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And, one more thing, the program is NOT supposed to >>>>>> make kids like reading. >>>>> >>>>> It doing its job then. >>>>> >>>>> It's supposed to make them better at it. And nobody can >>>>>> deny that good independent reading ability is a >>>>>> necessary skill. >>>>>> >
Many important di...See Morelease consider for a moment that parents, who seek information and arrive at this board after Googling "accelerated reader," may be sincere when they are moved to post, "I think AR, or at least the way AR is implemented in my child's school, is creating a problem where one never existed before. Does anyone else see this?"
Many important distinctions were lost in the previous post (by "to middle school mom"), which stands as a classic example of a chilling "teach them so they can go to work" approach to education. (Huh? It's okay to write off some students, really just force them to read for now, because they could become financial planners who don't care to read when they leave school? Is this what we aspire to?)
Lost in the discussion are crucial differences between in- class reading instruction and in-class reading practice, between in-school reading and at-home reading, between students who love to pick up a book (and already read a lot) and students who need extra encouragement, between actual reading and the AR quiz database (designed by a company, not educators) and more.
There seems to be an attitude among some teachers that "anything that gets 'em to read" is okay. With all due respect to the noble profession of teaching -- um, no, it's actually not okay to use any means necessary, applied any way a school sees fit.
I can't in good conscience apply the "whip" of our school's graded AR reading parameters to my child in my own home when they already frequently pick up books voluntarily and freely, with no interference from me.
Please indulge an analogy. Say my child has come to love eating vegetables through years of careful, loving parental encouragement. Now a school or some other entity says, "Families, this year students need to keep track of their vegetable consumption at home. Make sure you base your choices on the nutritional value as determined by the corporate database we buy rights to with your tax dollars. Hand in your vegetable reports four times a quarter. This will be part of your grade."
Yes reading is important, no one is saying it isn't. But isn't "managing reading" this way really about feeding the "accountability" beast, not what is best for our children in the long run?
On 1/15/10, middle school mom wrote: > Please consi...See MoreJust think of all the kids who never had vegetables before who will now be trying some at school because their parents don't lovingly feed any vegetables to them at home. All they get it junk food. Or where they once only ate carrots, now they are trying spinich, brussel sprouts etc.?
On 1/15/10, middle school mom wrote: > Please consider for a moment that parents, who seek > information and arrive at this board after > Googling "accelerated reader," may be sincere when they are > moved to post, "I think AR, or at least the way AR is > implemented in my child's school, is creating a problem > where one never existed before. Does anyone else see this?" > > Many important distinctions were lost in the previous post > (by "to middle school mom"), which stands as a classic > example of a chilling "teach them so they can go to work" > approach to education. (Huh? It's okay to write off some > students, really just force them to read for now, because > they could become financial planners who don't care to read > when they leave school? Is this what we aspire to?) > > Lost in the discussion are crucial differences between in- > class reading instruction and in-class reading practice, > between in-school reading and at-home reading, between > students who love to pick up a book (and already read a > lot) and students who need extra encouragement, between > actual reading and the AR quiz database (designed by a > company, not educators) and more. > > There seems to be an attitude among some teachers > that "anything that gets 'em to read" is okay. With all > due respect to the noble profession of teaching -- um, no, > it's actually not okay to use any means necessary, applied > any way a school sees fit. > > I can't in good conscience apply the "whip" of our school's > graded AR reading parameters to my child in my own home > when they already frequently pick up books voluntarily and > freely, with no interference from me. > > Please indulge an analogy. Say my child has come to love > eating vegetables through years of careful, loving parental > encouragement. Now a school or some other entity > says, "Families, this year students need to keep track of > their vegetable consumption at home. Make sure you base > your choices on the nutritional value as determined by the > corporate database we buy rights to with your tax dollars. > Hand in your vegetable reports four times a quarter. This > will be part of your grade." > > Yes reading is important, no one is saying it isn't. But > isn't "managing reading" this way really about feeding > the "accountability" beast, not what is best for our > children in the long run? >
Please read my post again, I think you misunderstood the analogy, especially the difference between reading at home and reading in school.
Our family's main concern is that our middle school forces our children, who already love reading, to prove to their teachers that they read on their own time at home by requiring them to take simplistic AR fact recall quizzes developed by a company, not by educators. The school then factors each raw score into students' English/language arts grades, no matter how long it's been since our kids finished a book. Sounds simple, but there are unintended, negative consequences.
From what I have gleaned here, our school is using AR wrong. Unfortunately, no one at the school seems to care, and the school will not let our children opt out, so we have had to research AR/Renaissance Learning and bring our concerns about the soundness of this approach to the local school board. This is where it stands now.
Please entice, cajole, coax reluctant students to read in your classroom. Draw them into a world of books. Of course that is your job. The more readers in our world the better.
But please don't make the mistake of thinking that forcing an AR program on all students is harmless. My kids read are reading here at home, as I write this, precisely because they are not nagged to do it. There is a body of professional literacy research out there that says: provide books and time to read, model reading, share your enthusiasm and you will see results. Don't buy into simple fixes hoping to save students from non- reading households. Bribes (trinkets and pizza parties) and threats (do it our way or your grades will suffer) are short- term solutions that can cause long-term damage.
On 1/15/10, veggie lover wrote: > Just think of all the kids who never had vegetables before > who will now be trying some at school because their parents > don't lovingly feed any vegetables to them at home. All they > get it junk food. Or where they once only ate carrots, now > they are trying spinich, brussel sprouts etc.? > > > On 1/15/10, middle school mom wrote: >> Please consider for a moment that parents, who seek >> information and arrive at this board after >> Googling "accelerated reader," may be sincere when they are >> moved to post, "I think AR, or at least the way AR is >> implemented in my child's school, is creating a problem >> where one never existed before. Does anyone else see this?" >> >> Many important distinctions were lost in the previous post >> (by "to middle school mom"), which stands as a classic >> example of a chilling "teach them so they can go to work" >> approach to education. (Huh? It's okay to write off some >> students, really just force them to read for now, because >> they could become financial planners who don't care to read >> when they leave school? Is this what we aspire to?) >> >> Lost in the discussion are crucial differences between in- >> class reading instruction and in-class reading practice, >> between in-school reading and at-home reading, between >> students who love to pick up a book (and already read a >> lot) and students who need extra encouragement, between >> actual reading and the AR quiz database (designed by a >> company, not educators) and more. >> >> There seems to be an attitude among some teachers >> that "anything that gets 'em to read" is okay. With all >> due respect to the noble profession of teaching -- um, no, >> it's actually not okay to use any means necessary, applied >> any way a school sees fit. >> >> I can't in good conscience apply the "whip" of our school's >> graded AR reading parameters to my child in my own home >> when they already frequently pick up books voluntarily and >> freely, with no interference from me. >> >> Please indulge an analogy. Say my child has come to love >> eating vegetables through years of careful, loving parental >> encouragement. Now a school or some other entity >> says, "Families, this year students need to keep track of >> their vegetable consumption at home. Make sure you base >> your choices on the nutritional value as determined by the >> corporate database we buy rights to with your tax dollars. >> Hand in your vegetable reports four times a quarter. This >> will be part of your grade." >> >> Yes reading is important, no one is saying it isn't. But >> isn't "managing reading" this way really about feeding >> the "accountability" beast, not what is best for our >> children in the long run? >>
Parents, please go to a parenting page and do all your whining and complaining there. Enough is enough. We are teachers who take our own time to come to this site to try to improve our skills and ask other teachers what works for them. Go start your own chatroom where you can all whine an complain with each other about the teachers your kids have who could not care less about their students, have no idea what they are doing, and are generally just rotten human beings.
The guidelines are on the same page where they discuss that they do not recommend using it as a grade, HOWEVER, they realize the need to do this in some situations, and then they give the guidelines, which are using percent of point goal earned as one grade and quiz average as another grade. These are the only two grades that would be common for all students, no matter the reading level.
Mine is printed on the opposite side of the goal setting chart. It explains the goal-setting chart and then has the chart on it, and it has information about certification levels on the back with the part about grading practices.
I removed that page from my materials and put it in my take- home materials since I use the AR goal chart regularly. That may not be something available to the general public via their website. It may only be found in the training materials, I don't know.
KellyOn 1/16/10, to all the parents invading this chatroom wrote: > This forum is dedicated to teachers utilizing accelerated > reading programs in the classroom. > > Parents, please go to a parenting page and do all your > whining and complaining there. Enough is enough. We are > teachers who take our own time to come to this site to ...See MoreOn 1/16/10, to all the parents invading this chatroom wrote: > This forum is dedicated to teachers utilizing accelerated > reading programs in the classroom. > > Parents, please go to a parenting page and do all your > whining and complaining there. Enough is enough. We are > teachers who take our own time to come to this site to try > to improve our skills and ask other teachers what works for > them. Go start your own chatroom where you can all whine an > complain with each other about the teachers your kids have > who could not care less about their students, have no idea > what they are doing, and are generally just rotten human > beings. Shame on you. Parents are the best resource teachers have and they shoul feel welcomed to express thier opinion. We do not require our students to participate in the AR Program but we make it so fun that we had a 94% participation rate last year. We have AR parties and the students get a small prize every time they take a test. As our students move on to higher grades they continue to be readers and participate in the program. Our students are eligible to participate in AR from K-5-12th grade.
You've managed to run off Ima Teacher, Deb ms/IA, and innocent bystander.
They were three people who knew how to use the program properly and offered advice on how to use it to those who were having trouble.
And, come to think of it, AR Fan hasn't been around either. Although those posts were a little snarky at times, he/she did seem to be very familiar with the program.
There used to be people years ago who posted regularly before Ima & Deb took over as the site gurus, but they were run off the boards, too.
Keep it up! You've almost run off all the people who disagree with you. Way to go!
I don't know much about this "AR" specifically, but it sounds like it has its strengths and its drawbacks like most things in life.
What I do know is that kids have too much homework.
Period.
On 1/17/10, That's a pretty dorky thing to say. wrote: > Run them off? Really? > > When we teach the kids about fact and opinion, it seems like > we typically include a line or two of discussion about how if > one has an opinion, they need to be able to support it. This > then tends to lead to a discussion of how we are all entitled > to an opinion. Let's call it the "Let's Play Nicely Talk". > Just because there are teachers here (not just parents) who > disagree with practice of using AR doesn't mean we are > "running people off". And in my opinion, if these people are > unable to handle a discussion that doesn't match their own, > then they should leave the discussion. The purpose of a chat > board isn't necessarily always to provide the cold facts but > to bring together a sharing of different experiences with a > topic. > > > > > > > On 1/17/10, How many more to go? wrote: >> Great job everyone! >> >> You've managed to run off Ima Teacher, Deb ms/IA, and >> innocent bystander. >> >> They were three people who knew how to use the program >> properly and offered advice on how to use it to those who >> were having trouble. >> >> And, come to think of it, AR Fan hasn't been around >> either. Although those posts were a little snarky at >> times, he/she did seem to be very familiar with the >> program. >> >> There used to be people years ago who posted regularly >> before Ima & Deb took over as the site gurus, but they were >> run off the boards, too. >> >> Keep it up! You've almost run off all the people who >> disagree with you. Way to go!
If you take a drive through the woods in a scenic national park and drive at 50 mph, you are likely to see a lot of things. You will remember some overlooks, a cabin, a waterfall, a babbling little brook and maybe see a deer cross the road in front of you. If you drive at 25mph, it stands to reason you will notice things you missed driving at 50mph. Maybe a bear and her cub, the other 5 deer that you missed the first time, a picnic area that you didnt see, and another road that takes you to a historical site. The drive won't seem as rushed and its easier to focus on what you are seeing, thus understandably a more enjoyable ride. The more enjoyable the ride, the more likely you are to do it again. If you drive at 50 mph, it was more like you were just trying to get to the end and accumulate miles on your car instead of enjoying the ride. When people ask you about the ride, instead of saying we saw a deer, a waterfall and rode 50 miles, you could tell them about the ride instead of how far you went and several things you remember seeing.
Instead of focusing on each others argument and formulating a counterargument, lets focus on the children and their reading habits and attitude. I dont believe that anyone is trying to degrade teachers by questioning AR. There are 2 sides to this beast, no doubt. The teachers want respect for their opinions, and rightfully so, but when they make posts like the "enough is enough" by "I'll say it" and "to all the parents invading this chatroom" that are dripping with sarcasm, it tends to be self defeating. If you are truly the professional teachers that you claim, then listen to some of the parents here. I understand you may not have the same views about it, but in the end, what we are asking for is for someone to address our issues with the respect that you seem to want. Perception is reality and what we are telling you about our children is reality. Do you think we are making this up just to run Deb, Ima and others off the chatboard? I believe every parent and teacher wants the kids to read well and often. I believe the goal is the same but we are having differences with the means. I feel the teachers here are not willing to see the forest for the trees because of an "I have training and you dont" attitude. Please dont take the issues personal and give an honest look at the whole. The old saying you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar comes to mind here. I feel the kids are having AR forced down their throats so hard and fast that it is choking them. I feel they will resent it for years to come, and as soon as the points and quizzes stop at what ever grade, they will be so relieved, that they will not read because of it.
Sounds Right to MeOn 1/18/10, Fireman Dad wrote: > Ok, here is kinda how I see it... > > If you take a drive through the woods in a scenic national > park and drive at 50 mph, you are likely to see a lot of > things. You will remember some overlooks, a cabin, a > waterfall, a babbling little brook and maybe see a deer > cross the road in front o...See MoreOn 1/18/10, Fireman Dad wrote: > Ok, here is kinda how I see it... > > If you take a drive through the woods in a scenic national > park and drive at 50 mph, you are likely to see a lot of > things. You will remember some overlooks, a cabin, a > waterfall, a babbling little brook and maybe see a deer > cross the road in front of you. > If you drive at 25mph, it stands to reason you will notice > things you missed driving at 50mph. Maybe a bear and her > cub, the other 5 deer that you missed the first time, a > picnic area that you didnt see, and another road that takes > you to a historical site. The drive won't seem as rushed > and its easier to focus on what you are seeing, thus > understandably a more enjoyable ride. > The more enjoyable the ride, the more likely you are to do > it again. If you drive at 50 mph, it was more like you > were just trying to get to the end and accumulate miles on > your car instead of enjoying the ride. > When people ask you about the ride, instead of saying we > saw a deer, a waterfall and rode 50 miles, you could tell > them about the ride instead of how far you went and several > things you remember seeing. > > > > Instead of focusing on each others argument and formulating > a counterargument, lets focus on the children and their > reading habits and attitude. > I dont believe that anyone is trying to degrade teachers by > questioning AR. There are 2 sides to this beast, no > doubt. > The teachers want respect for their opinions, and > rightfully so, but when they make posts like the "enough is > enough" by "I'll say it" and "to all the parents invading > this chatroom" that are dripping with sarcasm, it tends to > be self defeating. > If you are truly the professional teachers that you claim, > then listen to some of the parents here. I understand you > may not have the same views about it, but in the end, what > we are asking for is for someone to address our issues with > the respect that you seem to want. > Perception is reality and what we are telling you about our > children is reality. Do you think we are making this up > just to run Deb, Ima and others off the chatboard? > I believe every parent and teacher wants the kids to read > well and often. I believe the goal is the same but we are > having differences with the means. I feel the teachers > here are not willing to see the forest for the trees > because of an "I have training and you dont" attitude. > Please dont take the issues personal and give an honest > look at the whole. > The old saying you catch more flies with honey than with > vinegar comes to mind here. I feel the kids are having AR > forced down their throats so hard and fast that it is > choking them. I feel they will resent it for years to come, > and as soon as the points and quizzes stop at what ever > grade, they will be so relieved, that they will not read > because of it.
Sure, not everyone reads instructio...See More"Percentage correct isn't intended to be a reading grade, but to show whether the student read and comprehended the book." You can find that here [link removed]
or follow the web pages from [link removed].
When quiz scores are used as grades, and the whole ZPD thing goes out the window.
Sure, not everyone reads instructions for everything they buy. But I know you'll understand that parents grow a tad concerned when they see their child's teacher doesn't follow directions for a product they are using on their kid.
yes, I am a teacherIt really sounds like you are not happy with the AR program at YOUR students' school. You are frustrated because you haven't been able to adjust the classroom to what you want for your child, please do not take it out on the teachers who come to this board to share ideas and to get suggestions from others using the program.
Who is talking about "adjusting the classroom" or "taking it out on the teachers"?
"Ima Teacher" and other teachers recently acknowledged here, in a fairly civil manner in response to parent concerns, that AR is widely misused at many schools. My children's school is one of them, and it's hurting kids. It's demotivating readers. Parents are asking questions, asking if anyone else sees the problems with AR implementation that we see.
My experience is that most of them already hate reading by the time they reach high school, maybe sooner.
The overload on reading leads to dishonesty in reporting, too, so we compromise the kids' integrity, their time, and their appreciation for education as an entity.
...See More