Dear Fellow Teachers: Last winter I spent hours getting my first web site up and working. Web site design was all new to me, but I could no longer sit back while one teacher after another was put- down and called names by students, on popular web sites.
I began to look very closely at patterns at the school I work at and found some things very disturbing. Most female teachers, over 50, consistently received poor rating and also received the worst comments. Single female teachers were told repeatedly, "to get a life." Male teachers much more often than female teachers were told by students, "I love you, Mr...," and students were more likely to identify themselves,usually using initials. Several other things became obvious over time, as well.
My goal, with my site, was to have a place for teachers to unite, contact their union reps. and legislatures. I, unlike most, did not view this new trend as a Free Speech issue, but as a huge insult to a female-dominated profession. Name me one web site where men, in a male- dominated profession, are insulted and humiliated as women are over and over on these sites?
Then, we have at the head of the NEA, a male, and the attorney for the NEA, another male; men who apparently don't think our reputations and careers are worth anything. Even the head of the U.S. Dept. of Education is a male, of course, and once again we are subject to more gender- biassing.
I suppose taking this horrible injustice to court would take 10 years and be very costly, something I'm sure these men do not want. Why would they bother? My feeling is, even if each teacher contributed $1.00, maybe we could get one attorney in the U.S. to get such sites better regulated. Teachers, take pride in yourselves and in our profession. We have so much to be proud of and do so much good. I am appalled by the apathy--have we reached bottom yet? Forget about the dollar, just contact Washington, or the union you belong to, whether it be the AFT (which has, at least, supported teachers a little, or the NEA.
My other problems are, and I will elaborate more, later. Children are being used and exploited by these webmasters. Yes, these people are probably getting rich off these sites, and I know that's life, but what bothers me is that the owners of these sites seem to be damaging the unique student/teacher relationship. I feel that this relationship has become strained and more adversaial, since these web sites started. Certainly, a student's paradise. More later.
Oh yes, one more thing, my site is costing me about $20.00 monthly. When I check my position on the Internet, I am so far out in cyberspace, that I'll probably never be heard from again. But, ironically, there are literally thousands of magazine and newspaper articles, including the NEA magazine, that have helped these web sites grow. Shame on them, how about equal time, here! Sorry this is so long. first-rate teacher
On 3/21/11, teacher1 wrote: > There should be a warning such as: > WARNING: ratemyteacher.com is not moderated by adults. Everything said by > contributors is anonymous, may have no valid base, cannot be verified; the > contributors are not representative of the student communities. There is no > verification that contributors are students or children. Consequently, Mr. > Michael Hussey,the owner, assumes full responsibility for any hurtful > consequences of the postings on ratemyteacher.com. > > On 3/21/11, sue ratemyteacher's Michael Hussey wrote: >> I believe that Mr Michael Hussey is afraid of having to appear in court. >> I say that because I noticed that the ratemyteacher postings strangely >> disappear when a teacher is in some kind of trouble. Save the postings >> earlier, so Mr Michael Hussey's responsibility can be examined by the court. >> >> On 3/21/11, sue ratemyteacher's Michael Hussey wrote: >>> - Mr. Michael Hussey should be sued for using children (for greed), >>> knowing that it may destroy teachers' careers and reputations. >>> - Isn't ratemyteacher some kind of child abuse? >>> - Is is different from encouraging children to write similar >>> anonymous graffiti on a teacher's garage door. This is electronic >>> graffiti with slanderous anonymous messages; this is not freedom of >>> speech. >>> >>> >>> On 3/21/11, stop ratemyteacher.com wrote: >>>> Keep a copy of postings(*)that could hurt a teacher's career or >>>> health.If something bad happens to the teacher in question that may >>>> be due to the postings, take Mr. Michael Hussey to court. >>>> Example: Someone(e.g. an adult)who does not like you as a teacher >>>> in your town(because of race, age, gender,religion, etc.)can >>>> anonymously discredit you for any other reason, as long as the >>>> wording is not vulgar. >>>> (*) use[FUNCT-PRCSC] key to copy the screen, then paste into a Word >>>> document; copy also the whole web address. >>>>
MarionOn 5/14/11, good idea wrote: > My guess is that Mr Michael Hussey (ratemyteacher's > owner) has a personal > problem with teachers and with education. He found a > way to rally others of the same kind to take revenge > and damage teachers careers. > > On 3/21/11, teacher1 wrote: >> There should be a warning such as: >&...See MoreOn 5/14/11, good idea wrote: > My guess is that Mr Michael Hussey (ratemyteacher's > owner) has a personal > problem with teachers and with education. He found a > way to rally others of the same kind to take revenge > and damage teachers careers. > > On 3/21/11, teacher1 wrote: >> There should be a warning such as: >>> WARNING: ratemyteacher.com is not moderated >>> by adults. Everything said by >> contributors is anonymous, may have no valid base, >> cannot be verified; the contributors are not >> representative of the student communities. There is >> no verification that contributors are students or >> children. Consequently, Mr. Michael Hussey,the owner, >> assumes full responsibility for any hurtful >>> consequences of the postings on ratemyteacher.com. >>> >> >> On 3/21/11, sue ratemyteacher's Michael Hussey wrote: >>> I believe that Mr Michael Hussey is afraid of >>> having to appear in court. I say that because I >>> noticed that the ratemyteacher postings strangely >>> disappear when a teacher is in some kind of >>> trouble. Save the postings earlier, so Mr Michael >>> Hussey's responsibility can be examined by the >>> court. >>> >>> On 3/21/11, sue ratemyteacher's Michael Hussey wrote: >>>> - Mr. Michael Hussey should be sued for using >>>> children (for greed), knowing that it may destroy >>>> teachers' careers and reputations. - Isn't >>>> ratemyteacher some kind of child abuse? - Is is >>>> different from encouraging children to write >>>> similar anonymous graffiti on a teacher's garage >>>> door. This is electronic graffiti with slanderous >>>> anonymous messages; this is not freedom of >>>> speech. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/21/11, stop ratemyteacher.com wrote: >>>>> Keep a copy of postings(*)that could hurt a >>>>> teacher's career or health.If something bad >>>>> happens to the teacher in question that may be >>>>> due to the postings, take Mr. Michael Hussey to >>>>> court. Example: Someone(e.g. an adult)who does >>>>> not like you as a teacher in your town(because >>>>> of race, age, gender,religion, etc.)can >>>>> anonymously discredit you for any other reason, >>>>> as long as the wording is not vulgar. (*) >>>>> use[FUNCT-PRCSC] key to copy the screen, then >>>>> paste into a Word document; copy also the whole >>>>> web address. >>>>>
I am disgusted with the encore program this year in my area. these teachers do not have any patients when it comes to children. what good is being a teacher when you say you can not handle the emotional children? this program is federally funded by grants to all children, and no child shall be left out, but now they are leaving children out with emotional problems. how right is that? children are suppose to be special and without children to teach and to help, then teachers would not be needed.
My apologies for clicking before proofing! It had been a long day! I guess I should be worried about putting my name, too, but everything I wrote is true and it helped to be able to voice that truth for the first time!
On 12/14/04, original source wrote: > Thank you both for your passion and thoughts on this...the point, as I see it, of a > Supt. gathering all of his employees in a Public school system to verbally, out loud > profess ONE faith, (not Catholic... in this case) is that he should make sure > he "represents" in good faith......if he is sleeping with a .....woman of political > power.... while his wife is alone at home.....he is living a lie.......and I believe > forcing his personal beliefs upon any other denomination in the audience...is > wrong...Jose - PA has many school districts where news reports run like this.....the > Supt. and the Asst. Supt. (his wife)......they are so small....???many have most of > the teachers going to the same church!!!!!...???? now how would a professional act > in such a situation......we are here to teach (sometimes what we are not certified > to teach) and it is hard enouogh to deal with parents, the sometimes 'wild child', > and many principals who should retire....Supts. too........many of us would love to > leave except for the pension system and responsibilities of family and > property....so we must stay .....and stand silent in the back row......with our > painted smiles on
I once had a supt. stand up and ask us to say the pledge and he made the point to say that in our school system we still say "under God." He didn't mention whether or not he was a Catholic or any other faith. Too often people relate faith and belief in God to a denomination. Prayer has nothing to do with the political aspects of the different denominations. You may not like the supt. or what he does in his life, but that doesn't make the prayer less meaningful or change the intent of the prayer. The Catholic church has had a bunch of priests mess up, but that doesn't change my faith or belief in God. I have also been several denominations, but I still prayed to the same God. God is the constant and He is sometimes lost in all the political aspects of faith. The bottom line is that prayer is harmless and should not threaten anyone. I would hope that a professional would reach out as a brother or sister of God and try to help the supt.
I teach in North Carolina and have found the same thing. Coming from a northern state, it is very strange.
On 12/09/04, Amy wrote: > My first teaching position was in a rural area in Georgia and we had a > prayer before any district (or for that matter school-wide) faculty > event. We weren't 'forced' to pray but it definitely was encouraged. > The mention of Jesus was frequent and it was certainly not a non- > denominational 'wish' for the health of the faculty and the education > of the students. I felt extremely uncomfortable in this situation.
a) A friend of mine teaches middle school and says that a lot oh you don't like No Child Left Behind. Why is this? Isn't it good to have a gauge by which to measure your effectiveness as a teacher?
b) He also told me that, at least at the school where he works, you have to join the teacher's union or you can't work there. Isn't this a little weird, considering that he is essentially being forced to join what is at best a political lobby group?
Thanks. I wanted to hear from some other teachers about this stuff.
Pardon Me, You said it all simply and succinctly, and may I add, perfectly with your statement: "The most serious problem with testing based educational reform is its singularity of voice, its insistence that education be evaluated and improved in a single way." Run for President, and I'll vote for you! Peggy
On 11/08/04, pardon me wrote: > On 11/06/04, Nick wrote: >> Hello all: two questions. >> >> a) A friend of mine teaches middle school and says that a >> lot oh you don't like No Child Left Behind. Why is this? >> Isn't it good to have a gauge by which to measure your >> effectiveness as a teacher? > > it is good to have a gauge to measure effectiveness as a > teacher; however, nclb doesn't provide that gauge. > Rewarding and punishing by test results was discredited in > the late 1800s. Current uses of high- stakes, state mandated > tests in all but Iowa violate professional standards for > test development and use. > > For example, high stakes testing programs (those with > serious consequences for students, teachers, schools, > districts) use a fallible single standard and measure of > student achievement, a practice specifically condemned by > the professional code of test developers, test publishers, > and educational researchers. Also, states have been and now > will be more compelled to prepare and use tests without > adequate time and attention to proper and justifiable test > development. More bad practices will be heaped on already > widespread bad practices in evaluating student achievement > and schools. > > The research over the past two decades indicates test based > educational reforms do not lead to better educational > policies and practices. Indeed, such testing often leads to > educationally unjust consequences and unsound practices. > These include increased drop out rates, teacher and > administrator de-professionalization, loss of curricular > integrity, increased cultural insensitivity, and > disproportionate allocation of educational resources into > testing programs, not into hiring qualified teachers and > providing enriching educational programs. so while in > theory nclb sounds good in practice and application it is > more than flawed and should be done away with. > > The winners, with the passage of this bill, are advocates of > standardized teaching and learning, and the few large > corporations that sell tests and test based curricula, not > children. The most serious problem with testing based > educational reform is its singularity of voice, its > insistence that education be evaluated and improved in a > single way. >> >> b) He also told me that, at least at the school where he >> works, you have to join the teacher's union or you can't >> work there. Isn't this a little weird, considering that > he >> is essentially being forced to join what is at best a >> political lobby group? > > my school district doesn't have such a policy, so i can't > speak to this issue. there are definite flaws in the > teacher's orgs as well and should be used to call for more > excellence among the profession in addition to advocating > for the rights and opportunities of the members it holds. > >> >> Thanks. I wanted to hear from some other teachers about >> this stuff. > > hope this lends some insight.
Dear K. Wheeler-- You must not be an educator. You can't water down curriculum and expect to pass these tests. You can't be promoted if you don't pass. In Texas, at least. You can, however, be forced to teach to the test to the exclusion of many important things the children should be learning otherwise. For a good website with eye-opening info., go to [link removed]
On 10/06/05, Ken Wheeler wrote: > On 11/06/04, Nick wrote: >> Hello all: two questions. >> >> a) A friend of mine teaches middle school and says that a >> lot oh you don't like No Child Left Behind. Why is this? >> Isn't it good to have a gauge by which to measure your >> effectiveness as a teacher? >> >> b) He also told me that, at least at the school where he >> works, you have to join the teacher's union or you can't >> work there. Isn't this a little weird, considering that he >> is essentially being forced to join what is at best a >> political lobby group? >> >> Thanks. I wanted to hear from some other teachers about >> this stuff. > The problem with No Child Left Behind is that schools now do > not want to look bad so they are watering down the curriculum > to make sure they have good scores from the state. Some > schools have went as far as to tell their teachers that they > can not fail anyone. The bottom line is that students are > being short changed in this ball of red tape we call No Child > Left Behind.
Our teaching staff and office staff have undergone a significant turnaround since a new principal was hired. Her policies have had a delitorious effect on staff morale and we are seeking a way to address areas of concern. We would like to use a survey instrument to evaluate her effectiveness as a leader, and deliver her a report card of our findings. If you have such a document or suggestions on how to implement a staff 's communication with their principal regarding the principal's performance please advise.
We are living in a time when the Bush administration has had success in the "trickling down effect" of draining educational resources by sending young U.S. citizens to war. The effect on the classrooms is that you have regimented methods of teaching students which are only meant to maintain control of behavior, but little co- operative teamwork is observed in these classrooms. The outcome is that the minute you turn your head, students are back to some form of aggressive behavior, either they throw papers at each other, throw something at the teacher and try to fool around with strange noises and disruptive behavior. This is the symptom of an environment of few resources. You have large classroom of up to 30 students with no teacher assistant to help you to do better your job and provide more quality education for students. You can have more than five students with learning disabilities, as well as numerous students with behaviorally disruptive behavior. Then, when you make disciplinary referrals for unsafe in-classroom disruptive behavior you are said to have "ineffective practices for excessive disciplinary referrals" But in the beginning of the year when you try to do things on your own without asking for help then you receive "wonderful evaluations of your performance as a teacher"... Then you are told that the discipline issue has to do with your seating arrangement, the lack of busy work for students and you are pressured to control their behavior by a row arrangement with a strong control system established by "busy non-sensical worksheet/drill work"... the students never learn co-operative behavior, neither are they given the opportunity to receive quality education. You have no in-classroom support except for maybe a substitute teacher that will be sent "temporarily into your room" to give you tips on how to control better your classroom.After the principal and the "sent substitute" came into my room admonishing me to uphold more strictly to the bathroom policy (only 3minutes between classes and no students allowed out of classroom to bathroom, unless extreme case of emergency) my disciplinary referrals increase in that students (some with medical/psychological conditions) now find the opportunity to challenge the teachers rigid policies. And when they exceed their demands, then the counselor will come with the fear that a parent can complain and with the reprimand that "the student has the right to go to the bathroom"... then you have a student that constantly talks and disregards general rules of being quiet during instruction or testing time. This student tells you when you try to maintain quiet "I have been advised to walk out of the room if you call my attention".... little did I know that they kept her out of my room for a few days since they knew that I would not return after vacation!... I did not even know. But I did think it was strange when I walked through the corridors and I saw her looking at me, talking to another student and making an expression of mocking laughter towards me. Then I have a group of entitled students who do not want to receive a minimum detention or warning for a minor/major disciplinary issue in the classroom. I have students who take this issue to the house office who then presents false information to parents about the fairness of my testing system and comments about my unprofessionality in sharing confidential info. of one student's family to another. I am treated with disrespect by one office when I am asked to discuss disciplinary issue about student, basically they do not believe my version since several students present a different version of what happened. These parents of the entitled group tend to have ingrained some mentality in their children that they can "fire teachers whom they don't like because their children never do anything wrong and their children will not accept much discipline from teachers"... What happens to the parents of special education students who feel that alternative teaching methods (visual/auditory creative methods) are best able to reach their children's needs but they are not as vocal at the hour of trying to secure services for their children! Are we supposed to be subject to the whim of students who do not want to be disciplined and who become the victims of false information they impart and supported by parents and administrators in detriment of the reputation of minority teachers. (No minority administrators and only two minority teachers)... How can one do advocacy for these groups of children of special education in these kind of environments?
I am surprised that all the concerns go towards having prayer or not in the school system. It could be that this concern has to do with the deep spiritual need there is in this country....what is concerning is that this deep need is being pushed onto others as is the current state of politics in which we try to arrogantly push our political views and ideas about God onto others who are different from us. I believe that in this effort many people are disappointed and trampled on in the name of the view of a few about how the majority of us should conduct our business. I believe that each person who is a true believer of a higher power, name Him or Her as you wish should close their door and in the privacy of their home make a true effort to dialogue with this spiritual force. An in true, kindness and commitment for the well-being of one's neighbor should practice true tolerance and love for the ideology, religion and practices of our diverse populations. No person should be excluded in the United states due to their color, their language or the religion for which they stand for.... Just remember that there are political prisoners around the world who are praying to the God of their own faith just because they want to be people who are allowed to "think freely" in an atmosphere of political control. This is the best gift we can give to ourselves and to our children, the respect towards other human beings to be able to publically express diversity of opinion and social/ political/religious backgrounds and still not be obliged to practice a form of prayer that does not come out from their beliefs or personal practices. We have the freedom to practice prayer in the quiet of the night, even at open daylight. We do not need to sit in a prayerful position for God to hear us. He/She is with us in every moment and when we are working, talking and teaching His/Her presence is with us... Please remember the experience of Manuel Vazquez Portal who is languishing in a prison of Cuba with only his bible and children/wife to comfort him. All because he is an "independent free thinking journalist"... Lets not create jails in our schools by obliging those who are different from us to engage in what Christ would consider, the sacred sanctuaries of our private souls and the discourse we can have are just a similar as those who name God in different ways, Mohammed, Jahveh, the God within each one of us and each of the elements of the universe. This would be a show of democracy rather than an effort to force others to adopt a false attitude towards prayer which only serves to disenfrachise those who are different from us. Think about this when all your efforts go towards this cause. Prayer needs action.... we need to create space for all the diverse populations of the United States and give a true show of democracy!...
On 3/21/11, teacher1 wrote: > There should be a warning such as: > WARNING: ratemyteacher.com is not moderated by adults. Ever...See More